MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | Oct 15, 2020 16:07 | #13441 |
FarmerTed1971 fondling the 5D4 More info | Looks nice... but no weather sealing or second card slot makes it a no go for me. I do like the larger grip. Makes me wonder what the X-H2 will look like. Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FarmerTed1971 fondling the 5D4 More info | Oct 15, 2020 16:34 | #13443 MalVeauX wrote in post #19138813 I've not thought about upgrading in a while, still happy with my X-T1 and X100S. But, I'm thinking that X-T3 (used for me) would be quite the step up in features like AF and all that. Thanks for pointing this out. That's a lot of great stuff packed into this little body. $999 is just an incredible price for that camera. Not sure you're going to find used ones much cheaper than that... the 1 year warranty alone is worth it. Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX "Looks rough and well used" More info | Oct 15, 2020 16:57 | #13444 FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #19138826 $999 is just an incredible price for that camera. Not sure you're going to find used ones much cheaper than that... the 1 year warranty alone is worth it. Do it, you will not be disappointed. The AF alone will make it a HUGE jump for you. Out of all the great things I'm looking forward to a little one like the locking diopter just is tops for me. That and the touch screen. I have to get an AF capable Fuji lens first of course, or with it. I literally use 100% all Samyang fast primes with my X-T1. But I'm starting to finally warm up to the idea of getting an AF capable Fuji lens with it. I've used my X100S for all the AF moment needs up to this point. I'm thinking for a Fuji AF lens, I don't want more primes, I have lots of primes and they're all fast (F1.2 and F1.4), so I'm looking at an used Fuji 16-55 F2.8. I was excited at first for the 16-80 because of the range, constant F4, sealing, etc. But ultimately I know I don't care about the long range end as much as simply having F2.8. So I think my AF lens will be 16-55 F2.8 and I'll watch for a used X-T3. KEH often has good deals on these with warranties, I nearly never buy new.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FarmerTed1971 fondling the 5D4 More info | Don't pass up the 18-55... it's really good. IS and small and light in weight as well. That set up is $1,399 right now, new. Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX "Looks rough and well used" More info | Oct 15, 2020 20:03 | #13446 FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #19138882 Don't pass up the 18-55... it's really good. IS and small and light in weight as well. That set up is $1,399 right now, new. Since the 16-80 came out there may be a bunch of the 18-55's on the used market. Worth a look. When I got the X-t2 way back when I bought it as the kit with the 18-55 thinking that I'd upgrade to the 16-55 at some point. I bought the 23, 35 and 50 f'2s instead. I do prefer primes. I buy quite a bit used as well... well lenses anyways. My X-Pro2 was used and shortly after I purchased it I had to send it in for repairs and it ran me another $700 so I had a used camera for the NEW price. I don't think I'll ever purchase another used body WITHOUT a warranty. Lesson learned. That's true, I will check into it as well. I'm not hung up on variable aperture. The main thing for me is just speed for low light and weather sealing. I prefer primes as well, just for the speed and I enjoy manual glass with long focus throw. But, for simplicity, I'd like at least one AF lens and it just makes sense to get a wider standard zoom (though I favor ultrawides, I have no real reason to get an AF ultrawide zoom like the 10-24 when I already have a 12mm F2 and don't need AF anyways). So the 16-55 or 18-55 or any flavor like that will likely do the job.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 3 years ago by EverydayGetaway. (3 edits in all) | Oct 15, 2020 22:49 | #13447 Apricane wrote in post #19138818 After my failed experiment with the X-T200 earlier this year, I wasn't at all sure I would try Fuji again, though the X-S10 that was announced today might very well change that (wondering why it wasn't called the X-T40? Because of the new grip design?). Never had been very much enthused by the X-T3 or X-T30 myself. Probably will wait until 2021 to make my move though, and certainly not before some rigorous reviews are out. Fuji does a good job of segmenting their lineup to support a wide range of users. The XT-00 line will continue to use analog dials and have that "retro" feel and look, the X-S10 seems to be aimed at those who are more a fan of DSLRs and the usual PASM dial interface. I think most Fuji "fanboys" or whatever you'd like to call us, largely like Fuji because they don't do it how everyone else does it... if they started making most of their lineup have DSLR style controls I think many of us would be disheartened, I know I would. I vastly prefer having a physical and marked dial for shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation and to a lesser degree, ISO. FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #19138825 Looks nice... but no weather sealing or second card slot makes it a no go for me. I do like the larger grip. Makes me wonder what the X-H2 will look like. Yeah, I was surprised at all the rumors that the X-H line wouldn't continue, I think it will eventually. I'm thinking the X-S10 is their aim at attracting more non-Fuji interface fans into the system possibly as a second system option, then they'll release the X-H2 to give them a clear upgrade path. MalVeauX wrote in post #19138834 I have to get an AF capable Fuji lens first of course, or with it. I literally use 100% all Samyang fast primes with my X-T1. But I'm starting to finally warm up to the idea of getting an AF capable Fuji lens with it. I've used my X100S for all the AF moment needs up to this point. I'm thinking for a Fuji AF lens, I don't want more primes, I have lots of primes and they're all fast (F1.2 and F1.4), so I'm looking at an used Fuji 16-55 F2.8. I was excited at first for the 16-80 because of the range, constant F4, sealing, etc. But ultimately I know I don't care about the long range end as much as simply having F2.8. So I think my AF lens will be 16-55 F2.8 and I'll watch for a used X-T3. KEH often has good deals on these with warranties, I nearly never buy new. Very best, I'm just going to throw a second vote in for the 18-55mm. You can find them under $300 easily any day of the week. It's a lens I've never regretted putting in the bag and I'm not typically a zoom guy. I'll be really surprised if the 16-80mm ends up replacing it for me, but we'll see. Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | Oct 15, 2020 23:32 | #13448 |
FarmerTed1971 fondling the 5D4 More info | Oct 15, 2020 23:37 | #13449 Just posted my X-T2 with grip and L-brackets in the classifieds if anyone is looking... Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewK Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 16, 2020 05:48 | #13450 FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #19138697 Fujifilm X-T3 will get an update (end of October... -7 EV low light AF faster Autofocus intelligent Face/Eye detection AF I think I may be picking up an X-T3 now. Yessssss.... my gamble to forgo the X-T4 in favor of the X-T3 has paid off
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 16, 2020 07:13 | #13451 I have always noticed that Fuji has a magical combination of optics and software to produce images. Even my compact cameras perform well
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info Post edited over 3 years ago by bobbyz. (2 edits in all) | Oct 16, 2020 08:29 | #13452 18-55 gets high marks but to me after using almost most Fuji primes, I would say it is the weakest of all of them. When I needed wide, 14mm f2.8 performed much better. When I needed 23/35mm range, both 23m f1.2 and 35mm f1.4 were way better. Same when I needed 55mm, 56mm f1.2 was no match. I don't shoot f8 etc, so in that case, it would have been less of a difference. 18-55 did have the connivence factor and for the $250-$300 used is a good buy. But I would spend $400 on that old 35mm f1.4 and stick with it. Slow focus, what ever it was an awesome lens, when I had it. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 16, 2020 08:40 | #13453 bobbyz wrote in post #19139085 18-55 gets high marks but to me after using almost most Fuji primes, I would say it is the weakest of all of them. When I needed wide, 14mm f2.8 performed much better. When I needed 23/35mm range, both 23m f1.2 and 35mm f1.4 were way better. Same when I needed 55mm, 56mm f1.2 was no match. I don't shoot f8 etc, so in that case, it would have been less of a difference. 18-55 did have the connivence factor and for the $250-$300 used is a good buy. But I would spend $400 on that old 35mm f1.4 and stick with it. Slow focus, what ever it was an awesome lens, when I had it. I mean, it's hardly a revelation to say primes are sharper than zooms... Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 16, 2020 08:47 | #13454 In Dublin City for more shoulder work Image hosted by forum (1068267) © Two Hot Shoes [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Fujifilm cameras and lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 16, 2020 09:37 | #13455 Glad I held off on the 10-24..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2476 guests, 95 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||