Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 09 Jan 2013 (Wednesday) 11:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

27" or second 22"

 
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jan 09, 2013 11:32 |  #1

I want a monitor upgrade. I have a 22" 16:10. Trying to decide if I get more by going with a second similar sized monitor or going huge. I know I get more screen real estate with the second LCD, but that also takes up a lot more desktop space.

Also, assuming I can't get exactly the same monitor (it's 3-4 years old, so unlikely) is it annoying to have mismatched dual monitors? Colors and brightness slightly different, mismatched bezel sizes, etc?


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peeaanuut
Goldmember
Avatar
3,560 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 708
Joined Feb 2011
     
Jan 09, 2013 16:32 |  #2

the physical mismatching never really bothered me, its the color profiles that get annoying when they are different. I dont think you will ever get it right unless you get 2 of the same panel.

As far as size, thats up to you, for continuity on the desktop I always liked matching sized monitors.


Stuff
http://joetakesphotos.​com/ (external link) : | : https://www.facebook.c​om/JKlingPhotos (external link) : | : https://twitter.com/jk​lingphotos (external link)
airbutchie - Joe was definitely right about adding contrast...
:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davtackett
Senior Member
Avatar
975 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Likes: 1028
Joined Jul 2010
Location: sterling Il
     
Jan 09, 2013 17:59 |  #3

I have a 22 and a 19", the 19 is much more vibrant but its so bright it hurts my eyes so my main is the 22. I have a 27" TV sitting on my desk also. I think a monitor that size would be too big.


Canon R5, RF 100-500, R5 with RF 24-105 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobDawg
Senior Member
261 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota, Eh!
     
Jan 09, 2013 22:19 as a reply to  @ davtackett's post |  #4

I have miss-matched sized monitors and it doesn't bother me and I partially would rather have it that way. I check out a friend of mine who had dual 24" next to each other and just seemed like too much looking around even though you have more 'work space'. Both of my monitors are Dell Ultrasharps and are near the same 'age'. There is some difference but nothing too drastic.

As as far as them taking up room on your actual desk, I highly recommend getting LCD arms. It's worth the investment!


Canon 60D, Canon 10-22mm, Sigma 30mm 1.4, Tamron 17-50mm, YN-560 IV Flash (2)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
convergent
Goldmember
Avatar
2,243 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 52
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Emerald Isle, NC
     
Jan 11, 2013 09:03 |  #5

I went through this over the years. I had two 20" displays that I ran in portrait mode side by side for years. Then I moved to a 30" and was happy with the change. Raw real estate was better with dual, but Sometimes you want to just have one big one and that was impossible. I also tried a 30 + 20 beside it... portait mode it was the same height. Did that for a while and finally pitched it because it was just too distracting to have that much space, and filled my desk. Now I have a 27" Thunderbolt Display on MacBook Air and love it... its just the right size and I use my iPad sometimes to do some things if I need addiional "space", and just use apps on it like for browsing, email, etc. Sometimes more space isn't necessarily better.


Mike
R6 II - RF 100-500L f/4.5-7.1 IS - EF 17-40L f/4 - 24-70L f/2.8 II - 70-200L f/2.8 IS II -
135L f/2 - 100 f/2.8 Macro - Siggy 15 f/2.8 Fisheye - RF TC1.4 - EF TC1.4 II - TC2 III - (2) 600EX-RT - ST-E3-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kronie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,183 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jan 11, 2013 09:20 |  #6

I have a 27" imac and its plenty big. I think it would bug me not to have matching monitors. I DO prefer 16:10 though. I am going to try and take my old 22" monitor and place it vertically to the left of the imac and see about using it for PS brushes....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pbelarge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Westchester County, NY
     
Jan 11, 2013 09:32 as a reply to  @ Kronie's post |  #7

Strictly my opinion, I am just saying...

2 monitors trumps one large monitor every time, even if the monitors do not have the same color rendition. (I currently have 2-24" monitors)

1. process on the better monitor
2. the 2nd monitor is not bad either, as one gets to see what others without calibrated monitors are seeing when viewing their images.
3. The second monitor can be used for so many of the process parts and opening other programs, or it can be off, not effecting the processing if it bothers you.

Mine is off now as I am surfing. There are times I have about 20 windows open between the 2 monitors, as I have learned how to use the setup to the best of my ability.

4. If you need additional desk space, get a file cabinet with wheels and place it under the desk, wheeling it out when necessary. I did this about 10 years ago (before I got into photography), and it rarely gets wheeled under my desk space anymore.


just a few of my thoughts...
Pierre

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
convergent
Goldmember
Avatar
2,243 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 52
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Emerald Isle, NC
     
Jan 11, 2013 09:43 |  #8

pbelarge wrote in post #15474681 (external link)
Strictly my opinion, I am just saying...

2 monitors trumps one large monitor every time...

This is key. Everyone is going to have a different opinion and the only way to know what you like best is to try both unfortunately. I tried dual and absolutely prefer the one big one. So neither trumps the other really... its purely personal preference. You'll see some people that swear by 3 monitors all 27-30".


Mike
R6 II - RF 100-500L f/4.5-7.1 IS - EF 17-40L f/4 - 24-70L f/2.8 II - 70-200L f/2.8 IS II -
135L f/2 - 100 f/2.8 Macro - Siggy 15 f/2.8 Fisheye - RF TC1.4 - EF TC1.4 II - TC2 III - (2) 600EX-RT - ST-E3-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John
Goldmember
Avatar
1,405 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2006
     
Jan 11, 2013 09:51 |  #9

Why can't you use a 27" as a second monitor?

Within the past year, I went from having dual 19" wide monitors to 24" and 27" monitors.

It might take some work to get the color calibrated but the 1920x1200 and 2560x1440 desktops are worth it, imo.


john | gear | web hosting deal for POTN members!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mzelmom
Member
Avatar
46 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Elk Grove, CA
     
Jan 16, 2013 18:10 |  #10

I recently purchased a dell 24" and was thinking the same thing, should I also use the 22" LG alongside. When the 24" arrived, I hooked it up alongside the 22" and it hasn't moved. I love having both. I can play with photos on the Dell and look up tutorials on the LG. Works for me.


-Matt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 19, 2013 03:51 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

peeaanuut wrote in post #15467545 (external link)
the physical mismatching never really bothered me, its the color profiles that get annoying when they are different. I dont think you will ever get it right unless you get 2 of the same panel.

As far as size, thats up to you, for continuity on the desktop I always liked matching sized monitors.


Got to agree on all points, another note, just make sure they are the same actual monitors




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,147 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
27" or second 22"
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1613 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.