let me know what you guys think of these low key portraits. thanks!
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
wasabean Senior Member 388 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Southern California - Los Angeles More info | Jan 09, 2013 19:20 | #1 let me know what you guys think of these low key portraits. thanks! Image hosted by forum (632142) © wasabean [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (632143) © wasabean [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stickman513 Senior Member 588 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2011 More info | Jan 09, 2013 19:24 | #2 They both look nice. the lighting and focus look good esp #1. Doug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wasabean THREAD STARTER Senior Member 388 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Southern California - Los Angeles More info | Jan 09, 2013 19:32 | #3 yes, i did apply some skin smoothing on #1, do you think it's too much?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
russ71satellite Goldmember More info | Jan 09, 2013 21:33 | #4 Both are nice, but pic 1 is the best, imo. Doesn't appear overdone at all. Nice tight crop and a beautiful girl. Is she wearing contacts in pic 1? There seems to be a glaze of some sort over her pupils... Canon EOS 5D, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, Yongnuo YN560II, Dynaphos strobe, 16 inch beauty dish, Vagabond mini.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wasabean THREAD STARTER Senior Member 388 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Southern California - Los Angeles More info | Jan 09, 2013 21:53 | #5 hi russ, thank you for the feedback. yes she is wearing contacts.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 09, 2013 22:30 | #6 Yeah I like #1 too. I dont think skin was overdone either Laurence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 09, 2013 22:52 | #7 #1 is very nice. #2 looks like the focus is slightly off. Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dhanso312 Member 56 posts Joined Jan 2013 Location: Sacramento, CA, USA More info | Jan 10, 2013 11:56 | #8 I agree with swjim, the first photo is very nice. The second is slightly out of focus, if it were to be in focus I think that it would be great also. Canon 5D Mark II gripped| Canon 7D gripped SOLD | 50 mm f/1.4 |70-200mm f/2.8L |24-105mm f/4L (FS) | 16-35mm f/2.8L |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fidelfs Member 77 posts Joined Nov 2003 More info | Jan 10, 2013 12:30 | #9 Great pictures!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DennyG Goldmember 1,870 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: On the border - US/Mexico More info | I like both shots but the contacts have got to go.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gazmorton2000 Senior Member 416 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Can't add anything more than has already been said above. The first is very nice and also IMO, not overdone. The second would have been with it had it been in focus.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wasabean THREAD STARTER Senior Member 388 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Southern California - Los Angeles More info | Jan 11, 2013 10:42 | #12 @fidelfs
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stickman513 Senior Member 588 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2011 More info | Jan 11, 2013 16:40 | #13 I agree the skin smoothing was not overdone as well, just curious as i could just make out a little texture still. Nicely done and thank you for sharing. Doug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1055 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||