Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 Jan 2013 (Thursday) 16:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 2.8 IS mk ii - Large pictures in this thread!

 
Johnny010
Senior Member
520 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 106
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Yorkshire
     
Jan 10, 2013 16:21 |  #1

So it finally arrived...and I am so happy with the quality. It was dark when i got back from work so havnt been able to take it out. I only have a 60D at the moment but still taken back by the quality.

But what I did do was stick a filter on it and tested it wit and without a 77mm Hoya filter and also grab a picture of the dog.

The images are in my dropbox https://www.dropbox.co​m/sh/bwrei5bhb3ud5zw/S​PDya4e1mx (external link) (including full sized jpgs). No sharpening done.

Filter:

2048
x
1365
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://img28.imageshac​k.us …2818/filtertest​2048s1.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.


No-Filter:
2048
x
1365
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://img203.imagesha​ck.us …/131/filtertest​2048s2.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.

‪#‎jcovellphoto‬
@jcovellphoto
Instagram: http://instagram.com/j​covellphoto (external link)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/jc​ovellphoto (external link)
flickr: https://flic.kr/ps/2dK​VG9 (external link)
Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com​/blog/jcovellphoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 10, 2013 16:31 |  #2

Did you try it without the filter? I had a bad experience with a UV filter ruining IQ on a 70-200 a while back, and have never used another UV filter since.

Also, the max image size allowed on the forum in any dimension is 1024px. If you just wanted to share photos from your lens, this is probably a more appropriate place.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=838247

Glad you're enjoying it! :)


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rivas8409
Goldmember
Avatar
2,500 posts
Likes: 586
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Lemoore, California
     
Jan 10, 2013 16:35 |  #3

Your sample photos are HUGE! You may want to make them smaller for this forum.


Body: Canon 5DmkII│Canon M50
Glass: Tamron 35mm f/1.4│Canon 85mm f/1.8│Canon 24-105mm f/4L│Canon 135mm f/2L│Canon EF-M 22mm f/2.0
Lights: Flashpoint XPLOR 400PRO│Flashpoint Streaklight 360│Flashpoint Zoom Li-on│AB800
Results: WEBSITE (external link)FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Johnny010
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
520 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 106
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Yorkshire
     
Jan 10, 2013 16:56 |  #4

Ah sorry...they are 2048s. Ill edit it now.


‪#‎jcovellphoto‬
@jcovellphoto
Instagram: http://instagram.com/j​covellphoto (external link)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/jc​ovellphoto (external link)
flickr: https://flic.kr/ps/2dK​VG9 (external link)
Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com​/blog/jcovellphoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Johnny010
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
520 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 106
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Yorkshire
     
Jan 10, 2013 16:57 |  #5

BrandonSi wrote in post #15471978 (external link)
Did you try it without the filter? I had a bad experience with a UV filter ruining IQ on a 70-200 a while back, and have never used another UV filter since.

Also, the max image size allowed on the forum in any dimension is 1024px. If you just wanted to share photos from your lens, this is probably a more appropriate place.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=838247

Glad you're enjoying it! :)

One is with and one without...the IQ has hardly been effected at all. Even at a 100% crop it was debatable. The non-filter version (#2) is actually worse probably from the action of unscrewing it. I should have re-focused but I think the difference is so minute unless you pixel peek!


‪#‎jcovellphoto‬
@jcovellphoto
Instagram: http://instagram.com/j​covellphoto (external link)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/jc​ovellphoto (external link)
flickr: https://flic.kr/ps/2dK​VG9 (external link)
Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com​/blog/jcovellphoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
promod
Senior Member
Avatar
504 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2006
Location: baystate
     
Jan 10, 2013 17:03 as a reply to  @ rivas8409's post |  #6

"ditto" on filters .. years ago I hung around with a photographer (before I was into it) who told me a filter is like takeing a picture from inside ur car ... all through another piece of glass .. since then I only use a filter to protect the element .. it comes off with the cap .... oh , and by the way, just go out and "enjoy ur new GLASS" ............


"if you are tired of starting over , then don't QUIT "

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,279 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
70-200 2.8 IS mk ii - Large pictures in this thread!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1043 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.