Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Jan 2006 (Saturday) 16:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

RAW - JPEG Image Discrepancy

 
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 07, 2006 16:30 |  #1

When I shot RAW+JPEG using my 20D with 24-70L lens, the difference between the pre-processed images looked about the same. Then yesterday, I shot RAW+JPEG using my 70-200L f/2.8 lens for the first time, and the pre-processed images were drastically different. The pre-processed RAW images, when I viewed using my Photoshop Elements 3.0, just came out looking good enough without having to go through any post-processing, whereas all JPEG images came out overexposed. I went out today for more shooting with the same lens and, again, all JPEGs came out highly overexposed. Why the discrepancy? I didn't touch the camera set up at all -- just default WB with both lenses. Then I was hit with the "Error" messages every few shots that drove me nuts. Don't know whether this has anything to do with the images coming out overexposed....

Any insights would be very much appreciated....



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 07, 2006 17:39 |  #2

Does ACR in PSE3 have the "auto adjustment" boxes ticked? If so it's compensating for your overexposure automatically. Turn off the "auto" boxes to see it as it was shot. Not 100% sure of this because I use CS2 not PSE.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 07, 2006 18:19 |  #3

Thanks for the response, Tim, but there doesn't seem to be any boxes to set the auto adjustment in PSE3. Besides, I just double-checked to see whether the exact same problem occurs when using my 24-70, and the result is that the images shot with the 24-70 are perfectly normal -- JPEGs came out pretty much the same as the RAW images. So I'm befuddled as to why the drastic overexposure when using the 70-200? Since it only happens when using the 70-200 lens, it cannot be the PSE3.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 07, 2006 18:40 |  #4

I don't know any reason RAW/JPG should be significantly different. The lens you use should be irrelevant too. Are you using a flash, just out of interest?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Jan 07, 2006 19:02 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #5

tim wrote:
I don't know any reason RAW/JPG should be significantly different. The lens you use should be irrelevant too. Are you using a flash, just out of interest?

No flash. Yesterday and today were both shot outdoors in sunny conditions. I'm getting kinda worried now since I had a bunch of "Error" messages while using the 70-200 today... like every 3rd shot...



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 07, 2006 19:05 |  #6

You need to send your 70-200 in for repair, IMHO, and it might help to send the body too if you can spare it. Suck when that happens, once of my bodies is away right now.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,447 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
RAW - JPEG Image Discrepancy
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2228 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.