Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 15 Jan 2013 (Tuesday) 04:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Green cast when uploading

 
matttoofif
Member
Avatar
65 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Reading, UK
     
Jan 15, 2013 04:49 |  #1

Hi All,

A quick question on pp and uploading to my website. Pictures that I edit and then upload to facebook maintain the colours that they were intended to have when I edited them, however if I upload them to flickr or to my website they seem to have a green cast on them. Could anybody possibly help me rectify?

Matt


Matt Boisclair, Reading, England
www.matthewbphotograph​y.com (external link)
www.flickr.com/mattboi​sclair/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/MatthewBPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 15, 2013 06:37 |  #2

Post links?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
matttoofif
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
65 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Reading, UK
     
Jan 15, 2013 06:51 |  #3

tonylong wrote in post #15490783 (external link)
Post links?

Here is a link to one that has come out slightly green

http://matthewbphotogr​aphy.com …7.html#photos_i​d=10713977 (external link)

This is how it was intended:

http://www.facebook.co​m …4024010521&type​=1&theater (external link)


Matt Boisclair, Reading, England
www.matthewbphotograph​y.com (external link)
www.flickr.com/mattboi​sclair/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/MatthewBPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Jan 15, 2013 07:05 |  #4

I see no difference between them using Chrome on Vista. The Facebook one looks as if it may be just a fraction brighter, but I think that is mostly down to the difference between the black and white backgrounds more than anything else. The Facebook one is bigger as well which also may be having an effect.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
matttoofif
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
65 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Reading, UK
     
Jan 15, 2013 07:34 |  #5

BigAl007 wrote in post #15490847 (external link)
I see no difference between them using Chrome on Vista. The Facebook one looks as if it may be just a fraction brighter, but I think that is mostly down to the difference between the black and white backgrounds more than anything else. The Facebook one is bigger as well which also may be having an effect.

Alan

Hi Alan- thanks for this. Its really weird but I have just had a look in Chrome and you are right, the view looks exactly the same in both pictures, however when using Internet Explorer it does cast a green haze over the image outside of Facebook.

I have also printed portraity pictures off in the past that look far greener on paper than on my computer. Very strange!


Matt Boisclair, Reading, England
www.matthewbphotograph​y.com (external link)
www.flickr.com/mattboi​sclair/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/MatthewBPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R1200GS
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 688
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
     
Jan 15, 2013 07:47 |  #6

They look the same in FireFox also


"No matter where you go, there you are" Buckaroo Banzai

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Jan 15, 2013 10:10 |  #7

matttoofif wrote in post #15490902 (external link)
I have also printed portraity pictures off in the past that look far greener on paper than on my computer. Very strange!

Printing is a black art! I have just received an order for a framed image I know will need a load of weird printer settings. I know they will work because I paid a printer genius to help me sort it out but even he admitted after we had figured it out that it made no sense.

You might expect an image that looks right on screen to print like that using "normal" settings, but thats far from the case in this case. Its the same with all the images from the same dawn session, but no others.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redcrown
Senior Member
351 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Dec 2008
     
Jan 15, 2013 10:52 |  #8

One of them has an embedded profile of ProPhoto, the other has a profile called "C2". I have no idea what C2 is, never heard of it.

But images for web posting need to be in sRGB colorspace. Otherwise, all bets are off on color matching because it depends on whether the viewing program is "color managed" and how accurate that program's color management is.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,740 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 202
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Jan 15, 2013 22:10 |  #9

Color management with IE is pretty poor. I think you'd be better off using FF, Safari or Chrome. Firefox has the edge for me since they have a way to switch a "hidden setting" so that untagged images are handled properly. I don't believe Chrome or Safari have this feature yet.

Also, any images that you upload to the web should be sRGB, not ProPhoto or aRGB.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
matttoofif
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
65 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Reading, UK
     
Jan 16, 2013 04:21 |  #10

Bob_A wrote in post #15494287 (external link)
Color management with IE is pretty poor. I think you'd be better off using FF, Safari or Chrome. Firefox has the edge for me since they have a way to switch a "hidden setting" so that untagged images are handled properly. I don't believe Chrome or Safari have this feature yet.

Also, any images that you upload to the web should be sRGB, not ProPhoto or aRGB.

Thanks for this- is SRGB a setting that should be applied when saying from TIFF to JPEG in Photoshop?


Matt Boisclair, Reading, England
www.matthewbphotograph​y.com (external link)
www.flickr.com/mattboi​sclair/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/MatthewBPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Jan 16, 2013 05:32 |  #11

matttoofif wrote in post #15495003 (external link)
Thanks for this- is SRGB a setting that should be applied when saying from TIFF to JPEG in Photoshop?

It applies to any image you upload to the web. So you do not need to save the image as sRGB unless you wish to use it generally. Doing it when you convert the image to jpeg when preparing the image for uploading is certainly OK.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 16, 2013 07:52 |  #12

matttoofif wrote in post #15495003 (external link)
Thanks for this- is SRGB a setting that should be applied when saying from TIFF to JPEG in Photoshop?

I'm not sure what your workflow with your specific software is, but in general you want to Convert to a specific color space for a specific purpose. But since you are new to this stuff, I'd just set your software to sRGB for general purposes. You can start by setting your camera to shoot in sRGB, and then if you go through a Raw processor such as DPP, Lightroom, or Camera Raw, set it/them to work in/output sRGB. If using a Photoshop/Elements app, you can go to Edit/Color Settings to set up your working color space options.

For images you already have you may need to go to Edit/Convert to Profile to change it into the sRGB color space, although in Photoshop I believe Save to Web also gives you that option.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jan 16, 2013 14:32 |  #13

First image has ProPhotoRGB embedded, the one on FB has Facebooks "Tiny sRGB".
Use sRGB for web.

http://www.getcolorman​aged.com/color-management/saveforweb/ (external link)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
matttoofif
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
65 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Reading, UK
     
Jan 20, 2013 14:10 |  #14

René Damkot wrote in post #15496909 (external link)
First image has ProPhotoRGB embedded, the one on FB has Facebooks "Tiny sRGB".
Use sRGB for web.

http://www.getcolorman​aged.com/color-management/saveforweb/ (external link)

Thanks for this. Just been trying to save some pictures as SRGB (using PS-CS2) and am going to edit>convert to profile then select e-SRGB but then the pictures show up very transparent. Obvioiusly Im doing something wrong and in the process I am getting very frustrated with myself. Is there a good place to go on the web to find some comprehensive steps on how to do it- the link above shows some steps from a later version of PS :)


Matt Boisclair, Reading, England
www.matthewbphotograph​y.com (external link)
www.flickr.com/mattboi​sclair/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/MatthewBPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 20, 2013 14:34 |  #15

I'm not sure what "e-sRGB" does but what you want is the sRGB shown here:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/01/3/LQ_633640.jpg
Image hosted by forum (633640) © tonylong [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,834 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Green cast when uploading
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1444 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.