Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 15 Jan 2013 (Tuesday) 21:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

second attempt with Rogue speedlight grid/gel kit

 
coeng
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: NJ
     
Jan 15, 2013 21:42 |  #1

This evening I tried changing things up a bit in an attempt to achieve more coverage with the Rogue grid & gel kit.

(See this thread to see where I left off with my first attempt.)

Tonight I decided to take play with the grid and bezel, and distance from background.

Below are six photos. All were shot at 1/200, f/5.0, ISO200, 1/2 power manual flash, and 20mm flash zoom.

I just can't seem to produce anything pleasing without overdoing it and getting a lot of background spill. Is it the color of my background?
Seems like the only decent results I got were when the grid was removed.

It would be nice if Expo Imaging had product videos of these gels in actual use.


1) 4 feet from black background, 45 degree grid, no gel.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



2) 4 feet from black background, no grid, no bezel, no gel...only the snoot-shaped holder that the bezel normally fits into.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



3) 4 feet from black background, no grid. Follies Pink gel in bezel without grid.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


4) Same shot as #3, except 6 feet away instead of 4 feet

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


5) 4 feet from white background, 45 degree grid & Follies Pink gel.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



6) Same as #5 except no grid.


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dustman
Senior Member
Avatar
885 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Mar 2010
Location: New Jersey
     
Jan 15, 2013 23:30 |  #2

You say you have your flash set to 20mm zoom?? (So I assume you are using a 600ex-rt?).............I am not sure if that is the problem, or if this will help. But try zooming it to 200mm and see what kind of difference that makes.

Just a thought, don't hold me to anything


www.DustinLevine.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coeng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: NJ
     
Jan 16, 2013 08:46 |  #3

Dustman wrote in post #15494558 (external link)
You say you have your flash set to 20mm zoom?? (So I assume you are using a 600ex-rt?).............I am not sure if that is the problem, or if this will help. But try zooming it to 200mm and see what kind of difference that makes.

Just a thought, don't hold me to anything

I'm not trying to make a snoot effect. All I really want is to be able to nicely fill in a background, as uniformly as possible. A slight halo effect is okay, but not more than that. If I zoom my flash to 200mm that would be the opposite of what I want.

The problem I am experiencing is that in order to produce a background to my liking, I have to crank the power up to at least half on a speedlight and remove the grid as I did in the photos below.

I am really considering abandoning this endeavor and getting a barndoor and gel kit for one of my Genesis 200 lights instead.


5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 16, 2013 12:13 as a reply to  @ coeng's post |  #4

I have the bare speedlight set from them for this kind of thing:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_Lighting_Filte​r_Kit.html (external link)

If you want to control the spill a little and still use the speedlite, there is the Interfit strobies barndoor, but I have never used it:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …R105_Strobies_4​_Leaf.html (external link)


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hot ­ Bob
Goldmember
1,045 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sanger, Texas
     
Jan 16, 2013 12:49 |  #5

coeng wrote in post #15495466 (external link)
If I zoom my flash to 200mm that would be the opposite of what I want.

I disagree with this. You are using the grid and holder to control the spread of the light. Zooming to 200 will up the intensity of the light but, it will still fall in the same pattern. To create an even spread, you will need to work more with the position of the light. Backing it further from the background will decrease noticable falloff as will raising it.

Bob


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigCarbs
Member
156 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 16, 2013 13:34 |  #6

coeng wrote in post #15495466 (external link)
I'm not trying to make a snoot effect. All I really want is to be able to nicely fill in a background, as uniformly as possible. A slight halo effect is okay, but not more than that. If I zoom my flash to 200mm that would be the opposite of what I want.

The problem I am experiencing is that in order to produce a background to my liking, I have to crank the power up to at least half on a speedlight and remove the grid as I did in the photos below.

I am really considering abandoning this endeavor and getting a barndoor and gel kit for one of my Genesis 200 lights instead.

How is this a problem? Are you trying to keep the light off of the couch? Are you framing the final picture with all the furniture in it or just getting the background?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coeng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: NJ
     
Jan 16, 2013 13:38 |  #7

BigCarbs wrote in post #15496637 (external link)
How is this a problem?

I was hoping to use 1/8 or 1/4 power so that I wouldn't go through batteries so quickly. I didn't know any better since I am very new to gels. There just isn't enought information available online for a newbie to succeed at gelling without spending money on modifiers, kits, and other items, and not getting the results you expect.


5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigCarbs
Member
156 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 16, 2013 13:57 |  #8

coeng wrote in post #15496656 (external link)
I was hoping to use 1/8 or 1/4 power so that I wouldn't go through batteries so quickly. I didn't know any better since I am very new to gels. There just isn't enought information available online for a newbie to succeed at gelling without spending money on modifiers, kits, and other items, and not getting the results you expect.

LOL get rechargable batteries. or get plug in strobe for home.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Jan 16, 2013 17:07 |  #9

First, zooming has a similar result to using the grid. The zoom feature on a speedlite reduces the diameter of the cone to coincide with the angle of view of a lens. There is also fall off from the brighter center to a dimmer edge. While 200mm may be too much, there is likely some setting between 20 and 200 that will work. The side benefit is that zooming increases the light efficiency of the speedlite while attaching a grid diminishes it.

Using gels impacts the power of the light source. That's a given. How much depends on the gel density.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whortleberry
Goldmember
Avatar
1,719 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
     
Jan 17, 2013 04:44 |  #10

Unless I totally miscontrue what you are saying, it seems as though you are working under a total misconception.

IF what you are trying to achieve is a wash of even colour at even intensity over the whole background as visible in your finished image then you simply do not need the grid at all. Like the zoom head on your flash, a grid is designed to restrict the spread of light and not to even it out. Evening out is a function of the flash reflector (built-in) and varies according to both distance and zoom setting. There will inevitably be some spill, which is only problematic if it's then reflected off another coloured surface adjacent to the background (you'd get a graduated colour cast from the direction of the reflecting surface).

You will probably find that juggling a grid and the zoom setting can actually give you a blotchy light where the pattern of the grid is projected onto the background (obscured on a draped background to a great degree). So if what you want is an even wash, a grid is not the way to achieve it. If you consider the three images here (external link) and extrapolate, you should understand the concept of light coning a little better. What you seem to be seeking is to exclude the penumbra from your background lighting, something which can only be achieved by

  • NOT coning the light down, with either a grid or the zoom reflector. Notice how the proportion of the annular penumbra to fully-lit area is far greater on the 16° image than on even the 25° one.
  • Greater distance between background flash unit and the background itself.
The cost of the latter, particularly, is having to increase the power setting of the background flash and, as posted elsewhere, this imples heavier use of batteries so buy some rechargeable cells and/or an external power pack. If you also use a black background to maximise colour intensity, this too will require additional power. Add a (typically) 2 f/stop gel filter factor and you need even more power. Three contributing factors to power demand!

BTW, I like your draped dark background - is it actually softly draped cloth or simply a trompe l'oeil?

Phil ǁ Kershaw Soho Reflex: 4¼" Ross Xpres, 6½" Aldis, Super XX/ABC Pyro in 24 DDS, HP3/Meritol Metol in RFH, Johnson 'Scales' brand flash powder. Kodak Duo Six-20/Verichrome Pan. Other odd bits over the decades, simply to get the job done - not merely to polish and brag about cos I'm too mean to buy the polish!
FlickR (external link) ◄► "The Other Yongnuo User Guide v4.12" by Clive Bolton (external link) ◄► UK Railway Photographs 1906-79 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coeng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: NJ
     
Jan 17, 2013 08:49 |  #11

Whortleberry wrote in post #15499486 (external link)
IF what you are trying to achieve is a wash of even colour at even intensity over the whole background as visible in your finished image .....

Not necessarily. All I am really looking for is the ability to consistently make a pleasing background color (using different gels) spread out enough so that I can have multiple subjects (children in my case) in the shot, but not to the point where spill becomes an issue. I thought I would be able to accomplish this with a speedlite but as you pointed out, I had at least three factors working against me.

In a change of direction last night I gave up on the speedlite approach. I decided to mount one of my monolights from the joists above my drop ceiling using a magic arm. The light was just behind the subject, overhead, angled down towards the background. I used a 40 degree grid and a pink gel (actually a transparent lid to a disposable tupperware container) gaffered to the reflector. Turns out the DIY gel worked out quite well whilst I wait for my larger gels to arrive in the mail.

I will post pics later today of my latest shots. I think I'm going to have to stop down my aperture a bit. Shooting at f5.6 causes my background to be out of focus. This would be okay for seamless paper, but not a cloth backdrop.

BTW, since you asked the backdrops I use are wrinkle-free Boss backdrops. Someone on this site once recommended them to me. I have black, white, brown, and two patterned ones as well. My grey one is on order...that is the one I plan to use for gelling.


5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 17, 2013 10:18 as a reply to  @ coeng's post |  #12

Is this them?

http://www.bossbackdro​ps.com/ (external link)


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coeng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: NJ
     
Jan 17, 2013 10:31 |  #13

FEChariot wrote in post #15500269 (external link)
Is this them?

http://www.bossbackdro​ps.com/ (external link)

Yes.


5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hyogen
Goldmember
Avatar
2,047 posts
Likes: 119
Joined May 2012
Location: Portland, OR
     
Mar 01, 2013 01:45 |  #14

do you find the light from the grids are soft enough? I want to do spotlight as key light sometimes...but worried that it might be too harsh. I Just got the Rogue Grids today. I found that the normal Rogue gels work just fine as well :D I just put it on the flash as I normally would and then put the grid snoot/bezel/grid.

I'm sure I probably can't avoid shadows when using grid, but hopefully don't have to worry about hot-spots..

thanks


justinleeportland (external link)
facebook (external link)
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
EOS R6, RF 16mm 2.8 / 45mm TS-E / RF 35mm 1.8 / RF 28-70 2.0 / EF 16-35 2.8 ii / EF 70-200 2.8 ii / Zhiyun Weebill S / Moza Slypod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,663 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
second attempt with Rogue speedlight grid/gel kit
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1757 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.