Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 08 Jan 2006 (Sunday) 02:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Palomar Observatory

 
Steve ­ Parr
should have taken his own advice
Avatar
6,593 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Jan 08, 2006 02:22 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

I was at the Palomar Observatory this morning. For those who don't know, it's about an hour and a half (or so) north-east of San Diego.

Anyway, I was a bit disappointed, as the Observatory website left the impression that a self-tour would, at least, get me to a point where I could get a good shot of their 200 inch telescope (which, at one time, was the largest in the world). As it turned out, though, no such luck.

I did, however, get this shot with the new 20D and 70-200mm f/2.8. The sun was in the worst possible location, but I did what I could:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



If you're happy getting only exterior shots, this would be a good place to visit. Don't go thinking you'll get a cool shot of the telescope, though...

Steve

Steve

Canon Bodies, Canon Lenses, Sigma Lenses, Various "Stuff"...

OnStage Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alanuk
Member
129 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Jan 08, 2006 03:15 |  #2

Did they not allow shots inside or was it just impossible to get anything worthwhile? I know that authorities get very nervous of people taking photographs these days!


Alan
http://www.alanrolfe.n​et/portal/gallery2/mai​n.php (external link)
http://www.alanrolfe.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tdragone
Goldmember
Avatar
2,190 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, California
     
Jan 08, 2006 04:06 as a reply to  @ alanuk's post |  #3

:) The self guided tour consists of walking up stairs to a small room with 5-10 b/w pictures and 2 interactive kiosks. Along 1 wall is poorly cleaned (Scratched) plexiglass and beyond that is the dimly lit main telescope. You're not supposed to use a flash; so the only option is to bring a tripod and try for a long exposure.

Been there; tried that. :|


-Tom Dragonetti
Spyder Holster + R5 with EF->RF adapter, 1Dmk IV, 50D, G11
10-22, 16-35 2.8Lii, , 24-70 2.8Lii, 50mm 1.4,
70-200 2.8Lii IS, 100-400L IS
1.4x TC, 580EX ii, ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Parr
THREAD ­ STARTER
should have taken his own advice
Avatar
6,593 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Jan 08, 2006 13:08 as a reply to  @ Tdragone's post |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Tdragone wrote:
:) The self guided tour consists of walking up stairs to a small room with 5-10 b/w pictures and 2 interactive kiosks. Along 1 wall is poorly cleaned (Scratched) plexiglass and beyond that is the dimly lit main telescope. You're not supposed to use a flash; so the only option is to bring a tripod and try for a long exposure.

Been there; tried that. :|

Yep, what he said.

Even with a long exposire, the lighting in the small room would be reflective off of the plexiglass. I just don't see how anyone could get an acceptable picture without actually being in the same room as the telescope...

Steve


Steve

Canon Bodies, Canon Lenses, Sigma Lenses, Various "Stuff"...

OnStage Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tdragone
Goldmember
Avatar
2,190 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, California
     
Jan 08, 2006 14:03 as a reply to  @ Steve Parr's post |  #5

I have had an idea about that though...

What about making some kind of a snoot to block the reflections off the plexi so you would get a glare free picture.

It would be easier if we could get a group together to go on a tour of the telescope area and then get the opportunity to shoot it from inside.

Anyone have any connections :)


-Tom Dragonetti
Spyder Holster + R5 with EF->RF adapter, 1Dmk IV, 50D, G11
10-22, 16-35 2.8Lii, , 24-70 2.8Lii, 50mm 1.4,
70-200 2.8Lii IS, 100-400L IS
1.4x TC, 580EX ii, ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,523 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Palomar Observatory
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2250 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.