I'm trying to gauge just how much smaller the 70-300 DO IS USM is compared to the 70-200 L IS.
Can anybody point me in the direction of a photo of each of these lenses side by side?
Thanks in advance.
Andy.
andym172 Senior Member  320 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: UK More info | Jan 08, 2006 14:10 | #1 I'm trying to gauge just how much smaller the 70-300 DO IS USM is compared to the 70-200 L IS. Leica M9 + 35mm Summicron ASPH
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop  26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Jan 08, 2006 14:12 | #2 Have a look-see here: (looks like it's half the size of the 70-200 when it's not extended out) ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 08, 2006 15:27 | #3 Ah, excellent, just what I was looking for...  Leica M9 + 35mm Summicron ASPH
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2506 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
