The 1.4x II and the 2x II Teleconverter cost the exact same from B&H. Other than the magnification, what's the difference? What do most people have?

themirage Senior Member 611 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Marion, Iowa More info | Jan 08, 2006 14:38 | #1 The 1.4x II and the 2x II Teleconverter cost the exact same from B&H. Other than the magnification, what's the difference? What do most people have? -Michael Gear List Designs of Utopia
LOG IN TO REPLY |
racketman Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 08, 2006 14:43 | #2 I would presume the 2x will show up flaws more than 1.4x ie if your lens isnt top quality a 1,4x might be the best option. Loss of light is obviously another factor so x2 will be easier to use with a faster lens. Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Jan 08, 2006 14:57 | #3 themirage wrote: Other than the magnification, what's the difference? What do most people have? With the 1.4x you lose 1 stop of maximum aperture. With a 2x you lose 2 stops. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 08, 2006 15:37 | #4 The 2x is bigger. Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Jan 09, 2006 14:07 | #5 -=FAQ=- T-con thread at top of page. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2508 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||