Can some use a picture as an example to illustrate please? What is 100% cropped as opposed to 75% cropped if there is such a thing?
cfcRebel Cream of the Crop 10,252 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX More info | Jan 09, 2006 15:48 | #16 Can some use a picture as an example to illustrate please? What is 100% cropped as opposed to 75% cropped if there is such a thing? Fee
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Jan 09, 2006 15:56 | #17 Open a picture in PS. Set the view to 100%. Make a crop of it that will fit on the screen, say 100px x 100px - doesn't matter. Save as a jpeg. Post to the web. You now have a 100% crop. It is more convenient, and takes less time to download and view over the web than the full sized image.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
UncleDoug Goldmember 1,103 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: North lake Tahoe, CA More info | Robert_Lay wrote: I see a lot of confusion here about something that is very simple. If the image is not resampled, then that image or any portion of that image is a 100% crop. So the important aspect of it is that during whatver operation you do to that image it must not be resampled. All of that other stuff, such as magnification and re-sizing and what the dpi setting is, etc., is all irrelevant. Did I get it right? Yo got it in my book! -Uncle Doug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfcRebel Cream of the Crop 10,252 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX More info | jfrancho wrote: Open a picture in PS. Set the view to 100%. Make a crop of it that will fit on the screen, say 100px x 100px - doesn't matter. Save as a jpeg. Post to the web. You now have a 100% crop. It is more convenient, and takes less time to download and view over the web than the full sized image. So there is no such thing as 75%, or 50% cropped? Fee
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BearLeeAlive All butt cheeks and string. 30,200 posts Likes: 70 Joined May 2005 Location: Calgary, AB More info | cfcRebel wrote: So there is no such thing as 75%, or 50% cropped? If you reduce the image quality by 75%, or 50%, then crop, it you would. -JIM-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Jan 09, 2006 17:33 | #21 Not really. I mean you can reduce the image by 25-50%, but that is kind of arbitrary. The only reason to do a 100% crop is to isolate and identify problem areas in an image, or to testify lens quality.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | BearLeeAlive wrote: If you reduce the image quality by 75%, or 50%, then crop, it you would. I sort of get your logic, but why would you do this?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BearLeeAlive All butt cheeks and string. 30,200 posts Likes: 70 Joined May 2005 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Jan 09, 2006 17:38 | #23 That is what happens to 90% or more of the 'attached images' but not necessarily the ones that are linked to. -JIM-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | cfcRebel wrote: Can some use a picture as an example to illustrate please? What is 100% cropped as opposed to 75% cropped if there is such a thing? Here is a 100% crop: It is taken from the full size version of this image: The purpose was to demonstrate camera shake rather than shutter speed as the cause of the softness. It would have been unrealistic to post the full size image, and the smaller crop isolates the area to make the point. I hope this helps!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | BearLeeAlive wrote: That is what happens to 90% or more of the 'attached images' but not necessarily the ones that are linked to. All images made by a 2+ megapixel camera are likely presented this way, but not all are cropped. Don't you mean resized?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BearLeeAlive All butt cheeks and string. 30,200 posts Likes: 70 Joined May 2005 Location: Calgary, AB More info | jfrancho wrote: All images made by a 2+ megapixel camera are likely presented this way, but not all are cropped. Don't you mean resized? To me resized is reducing file size, cropping is reducing the ammount of image shown, and neither has to do with the physical size of the picture. -JIM-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Jan 09, 2006 18:00 | #27 A 100% crop is posted without resizing. I'm no guru, but I know what I'm talking about here. The terminology I have used is straight from Photoshop, a standard. I'm not trying to start an argument, but I think the post that mentioned dpi (a printing term) is where everyone got confused. A 100% crop is a representative portion of an image that has not been resized itself, meaning one pixel in the file represents one pixel on the screen. Veiwing an entire image at that viewing resolution would be too cumbersom over the web, so we crop it to a manageable size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sony23 Senior Member 738 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2005 More info | I have used images for this hope it help.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sony23 Senior Member 738 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2005 More info | jfrancho wrote: A 100% crop is posted without resizing. I'm no guru, but I know what I'm talking about here. The terminology I have used is straight from Photoshop, a standard. I'm not trying to start an argument, but I think the post that mentioned dpi (a printing term) is where everyone got confused. A 100% crop is a representative portion of an image that has not been resized itself, meaning one pixel in the file represents one pixel on the screen. Veiwing an entire image at that viewing resolution would be too cumbersom over the web, so we crop it to a manageable size. you explained it better than me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | sony23 wrote: you explained it better than me. thanks Bruce Thanks, Bruce. sony23 wrote: what you see in a 100% crop is what you would see if you were holding the picture in your hand. Careful! I think this is what is confusing everyone. Is that true if printed at 4x6? What about 20x30? A 100% crop is a portion of what you would see if viewed at 100% in an image editor.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1669 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||