Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 26 Jan 2013 (Saturday) 10:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A New Bare Bulb Flash Arrives

 
mmmfotografie
hanging up-side-down in a cave
2,114 posts
Likes: 492
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Helsinki Airport
     
May 14, 2014 12:11 |  #4321

@Robs how does this influence the colour temperature?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robsphoto
Senior Member
277 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 34
Joined May 2011
Location: Killeen TX
     
May 14, 2014 13:14 |  #4322

mmmfotografie wrote in post #16904014 (external link)
@Robs how does this influence the colour temperature?

I was asking you the question!!


Happy Shooting:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmmfotografie
hanging up-side-down in a cave
2,114 posts
Likes: 492
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Helsinki Airport
     
May 14, 2014 13:48 |  #4323

Robsphoto wrote in post #16904129 (external link)
I was asking you the question!!

For the stated aperture, the distance and power setting is of importance and that aperture was measured by me with a lightmeter. Using a lightmeter made it a lot easier for me to have well lit target at the first go. As stated before I was foremost interested in the Kelvin value.

So you don't have to read to much into that (distance) and it is more like a bonus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6766
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
May 14, 2014 18:23 |  #4324

If you use the colorchecker passport like it suppose to used (every light change and location) it won't make a difference on the color of the strobe output. ;)


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmmfotografie
hanging up-side-down in a cave
2,114 posts
Likes: 492
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Helsinki Airport
     
May 15, 2014 04:00 |  #4325

abbadon31 wrote in post #16904760 (external link)
If you use the colorchecker passport like it suppose to used (every light change and location) it won't make a difference on the color of the strobe output. ;)

I started the test because I first saw a Kelvin value of 7500 for the 180 degrees modifier and this could give problems when using more than one flash with different light modifiers.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6766
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
May 15, 2014 10:36 |  #4326

If you want an accurate test your going to want to make sure everything around the colorchecker needs to to be neutral or your going to get a color cast. I see its on a wooden table top and that will cause color bounce.

If the colorcheck captures a even mixer of light from both strobes it going to give you the right balance. If one takes just from one source and add the other one in later with out a new capture the color will be off. When using a colorchecker one needs to always take a new picture of it when anything changes in lighting (power levels, distance or location change).


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmmfotografie
hanging up-side-down in a cave
2,114 posts
Likes: 492
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Helsinki Airport
     
May 15, 2014 11:03 |  #4327

abbadon31 wrote in post #16906232 (external link)
If you want an accurate test your going to want to make sure everything around the colorchecker needs to to be neutral or your going to get a color cast. I see its on a wooden table top and that will cause color bounce.

If the colorcheck captures a even mixer of light from both strobes it going to give you the right balance. If one takes just from one source and add the other one in later with out a new capture the color will be off. When using a colorchecker one needs to always take a new picture of it when anything changes in lighting (power levels, distance or location change).

That is why I taped colorchecker on a box so it would stick out in front of the wooden top.

I was not going for an 'real' Kelvin value. I would then need a neutral or absolute black surrounding and the Kelvin value measured by me should be lower when I look at the specifications stated by Godox. I just wanted to know the differences between the modifiers.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6766
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
May 15, 2014 13:11 |  #4328

mmmfotografie wrote in post #16906288 (external link)
That is why I taped colorchecker on a box so it would stick out in front of the wooden top.

I was not going for an 'real' Kelvin value. I would then need a neutral or absolute black surrounding and the Kelvin value measured by me should be lower when I look at the specifications stated by Godox. I just wanted to know the differences between the modifiers.


I get what your saying just making sure everyone else understands. The colorchecker i can see in the images is still to close to the wood. Example like green grass is at a subjects feet in an image, it will still pulls a color cast up past the subjects knees.

But what I see in the image is a not so black monitor and wood. Even the color off the not so black monitor is going to cause a color cast. If you want a true reading your going to want to setup a non reflective black or neutral white that covers the whole area of your light beam/path. If the beam spread is 15" then you need to cover around 18" and if your beam is 7' feet wide you need around 10' covered. (boxed)

I'm not attacking you on your testing or trying to start anything. All true testing need to be in controled environment. Like f/stop testing need to done in a pitch black room with no effective surfaces to get a true reading.


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmmfotografie
hanging up-side-down in a cave
2,114 posts
Likes: 492
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Helsinki Airport
     
May 15, 2014 15:24 |  #4329

abbadon31 wrote in post #16906585 (external link)
I get what your saying just making sure everyone else understands. The colorchecker i can see in the images is still to close to the wood. Example like green grass is at a subjects feet in an image, it will still pulls a color cast up past the subjects knees.

But what I see in the image is a not so black monitor and wood. Even the color off the not so black monitor is going to cause a color cast. If you want a true reading your going to want to setup a non reflective black or neutral white that covers the whole area of your light beam/path. If the beam spread is 15" then you need to cover around 18" and if your beam is 7' feet wide you need around 10' covered. (boxed)

I'm not attacking you on your testing or trying to start anything. All true testing need to be in controled environment. Like f/stop testing need to done in a pitch black room with no effective surfaces to get a true reading.

I have to check and clean the studio, sadly not mine, after today a group used it for making a video so I will run the test again with the same setup so I have a correction value to my earlier findings.

The studio is huge with a neutral white background+floor and 100% dark so ideal to test this. I can use the black cloth to even exclude any reflected light by the walls and floor.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grafikastudios
Hatchling
Avatar
9 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Paris
     
May 15, 2014 18:32 |  #4330

Love these flashes :cool:
Yesterday's shoot sunny day in Paris
CL180 At full power in 22"BD, 5dmkii 85mm F2.5 50isos whith nd4

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/05/3/LQ_685234.jpg
Image hosted by forum (685234) © grafikastudios [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BamPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,175 posts
Likes: 129
Joined Sep 2005
Location: AZ-USA
     
May 15, 2014 19:46 as a reply to  @ grafikastudios's post |  #4331

Beautiful shot and welcome to POTN!


Randy
My Gear List and Feedback
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SamFrench
Senior Member
Avatar
876 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Jul 2011
Location: High in the Mountains
     
May 15, 2014 20:07 |  #4332

Nice image grafikastudios. And welcome.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grafikastudios
Hatchling
Avatar
9 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Paris
     
May 16, 2014 05:29 |  #4333

BamPhoto wrote in post #16907440 (external link)
Beautiful shot and welcome to POTN!

thanks :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grafikastudios
Hatchling
Avatar
9 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Paris
     
May 16, 2014 05:29 |  #4334

SamFrench wrote in post #16907470 (external link)
Nice image grafikastudios. And welcome.

thanks !!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmmfotografie
hanging up-side-down in a cave
2,114 posts
Likes: 492
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Helsinki Airport
     
May 16, 2014 15:21 as a reply to  @ grafikastudios's post |  #4335

This is a continuation on this topic by me: Colorchecker test different modifiers

I did more tests in the studio today when I was there and it was on black underground, black sides and a black background.

The colour temperatures are more stable and around 6400 Kelvin. This measured by a colorchecker and measured in RAW converter for Photoshop.

Bare bulb was 6050 Kelvin and in the more neutral setting it is 6450 Kelvin.
Standard reflector was 6350 Kelvin and in the more neutral setting it is 6400 Kelvin
180 Degrees modifier was 6950 Kelvin and in the more neutral setting it is 7300 Kelvin.

So the 180 degrees modifier that I got is probably this the first version with to much green in it and underneath you find two histograms.

IMAGE: http://mmmfotografie.nl/files/POTN/Godox/180degrees.jpg
180 degrees modifier histogram

IMAGE: http://mmmfotografie.nl/files/POTN/Godox/reflector.jpg
reflector histogram

The power setting on the flash was for the reflector 1/32 and for the bare bulb and 180 degrees1/4 +3. That is a lot of direct light lost and the light meter only registered 2.2 and with the reflector it was 7.1 and this also brings out a mistake I made in the previous test. In that test I stated that I increased the power setting on the flash when going to the beautydish but now I think I did it much earlier when I got to the bare bulb.
I tested the reflector as first in the previous run.

The previous user phoned me yesterday that the floor had taken a beating and they used cubics with slogans on it that left orange paint on the studio floor and I first tried to clean it but to no avail. Had to paint the floor again and it was a long time ago for me and normally the owner does this but he is on a bicycle vacation from the Netherland to Portugal. The paint surprised me because it not white as I expected but light gray and when painting was really dark but when dried it became lighter and when lots of light hits it get pure white. Nice paint and is for photostudios and I remember that it has less blue in it.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,580,206 views & 279 likes for this thread, 307 members have posted to it and it is followed by 90 members.
A New Bare Bulb Flash Arrives
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
572 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.