Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 26 Jan 2013 (Saturday) 10:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Starter gear - What's more critical, A better lens or Flash?

 
SamSkyline
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Jan 26, 2013 10:44 |  #1

So i'm starting my first photography evening classes soon,
And i want to start gearing up for the class.

I currently own canon 600D, a kit lens and a 18-135 mm lens.

But I'm not sure what's more in hurry for me.
To buy a new landscape/protrait lens or flash.

I'm kind of leaning towards buying flash and waiting a bit untill buying an advanced lens but i'm not sure.

What do you guys think?

[I'm sorry if this question has been asked oftenly,i couldnt find a thread samillier to this anywhere]


http://500px.com/Shani​Skyline (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 26, 2013 10:49 |  #2

What's your budget? You can get a good manual flash for $50-$60 (YN-560 II comes to mind).

Lenses are a different story.. obviously you need a zoom to do landscape and portraits in a single lens, I'm not really sure what a good option would be on a crop, but I think your talking $400-$500 at the very low end for something of any reasonable quality.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SamSkyline
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Jan 26, 2013 10:54 |  #3

BrandonSi wrote in post #15536061 (external link)
What's your budget? You can get a good manual flash for $50-$60 (YN-560 II comes to mind).

Lenses are a different story.. obviously you need a zoom to do landscape and portraits in a single lens, I'm not really sure what a good option would be on a crop, but I think your talking $400-$500 at the very low end for something of any reasonable quality.

So you're saying,flash first?


http://500px.com/Shani​Skyline (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 26, 2013 11:13 |  #4

Not really, just pointing out the price difference, and that it's possible to get both, depending on your budget.

What do you shoot more of?

If you're doing landscape, a flash isn't going to help that much. If you're doing portraits, a flash is useful, though you're pretty limited to what you can do as far as a single on-camera speedlite. Natural light works very well with portraits as well.

I personally would take a 17-40L (which I think should pretty much work for landscape/portraits on a crop) over a flash. Of course one is around $550-$600 second hand, and the flash is ~$60. If I was going to spend $550, I don't think I'd have a problem spending $60 more to add the flash, and get both.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Jan 26, 2013 11:14 |  #5

I would buy a flash first. This is tool one really needs to learn and come close to mastering, IMO.

The flash will give you much more flexibility using what you have today and provide a much needed learning experience necessary to move forward.

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Jan 26, 2013 11:16 |  #6

I'd recommend getting a flash and getting used to using one, before getting a different lens; unless, as Brandon mentions, your primary goal is shooting landscapes.

A decent flash can allow you to shoot indoors, etc much more easily without requiring "fast" (and expensive" lenses. Learning to use bounced flash and off camera flash (OCF) really allow you to control your light a lot better.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tickerguy
Senior Member
595 posts
Joined Dec 2012
     
Jan 26, 2013 11:20 |  #7

I'd agree with that.

Flash is something you want to learn how to use, and a decent flash is cheaper than a good lens -- by a lot.


Canon 7D & 5d3, EF-S 15-85, 24-105L, 70-200L f/4 IS, 100mm Macro/L, EF 50 f/1.4 and more

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobweigh
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined Dec 2012
     
Jan 26, 2013 11:24 |  #8

Flash




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harpo63
Senior Member
Avatar
265 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Lancaster, PA
     
Jan 26, 2013 11:49 |  #9

The 18-135mm lens is not bad. Its not L, but I started out with that on my rebel before moving up and so did many others. Images posted on this forum by those who mastered the camera/lens combo they had showed its capable of good clear images. A flash on the other hand, as someone said here, opens up a whole other world. If I had gotten a flash sooner, I would have been less frustrated with many of my shots that really needed some fill lighting or in low light situations.

As mentioned already, a flash will help you grow as a photographer until you get to the point where upgrading lens or cameras take place. The 18-135 is a good walk around lens to start with that covers the range that a 17-40 and 24-105 does. My wife now uses my old T2i and 18-135 and gets some real nice pics in auto mode that are good enough to be on the wall.

Since you're taking a photo class, you will learn fast enough how to take good pics with your camera/lens combo. Heck, the older masters had camera/lenses that were not as good as yours! You might have an opportunity to try out a variety of lenses in your class, that would be the best place to experiment then you can make the best decision for the next lens without asking a bunch of people who really don't know your budget, interests, skill level, etc. Just my 2 cents.


5D3 : 16-35 f4 L : 24-70 f2.8 II L : 70-200 f2.8 II L : 50mm f1.4 : 600EX-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Jan 26, 2013 15:38 |  #10

I'd recommend the flash.... also get an off-camera shoe cord and a flash bracket, to be able to position it better (than in the camera's hot shoe).

For one thing, for all practical purposes, there is no such thing as a "landscape/portrait" lens. Generally speaking, a landscape lens is a wide angle and doesn't require a large aperture. Conversely, generally speaking a portrait lens is a short telephoto with a larger aperture. So, for landscape a lens such as the EF-S 10-22 might be ideal. For portraiture you might choose a 50/1.4 or 85/1.8, or perhaps a 50/1.8 as a low cost alternative for occasional use.

These aren't hard and fast rules by any means.... People think outside the box and do interesting things with non-traditional tools all the time. However, it's still pretty likely that to shoot landscape and portraiture you are looking at two additional lenses, not just one.

The lens you've got covers moderate wide angle to moderate telephoto range, usable for a wide variety of things. So I'd suggest you stick with that for now and add the flash instead.

The built-in flashes sort of suck, anyway. They are underpowered, drain the camera's battery, and are in the worst possible location for redeye and ugly shadow problems. An accessory flash opens up a whole lot more possibilities and can do a much nicer job.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kawi_200
Goldmember
1,477 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 236
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Stanwood, WA
     
Jan 26, 2013 15:49 |  #11

For me and my shooting style, lenses are more important than flashes. I rarely use my flashes. I prefer natural light.


5D4 | 8-15L | 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | 24L II | 40mm pancake | 100L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS mk2 | 400mm f/4 DO IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
londonbairn
Member
181 posts
Joined Nov 2012
     
Jan 26, 2013 16:02 |  #12

I agree with the above, and I think mastering natural light first is better, then tackle flashes later, if you need it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Viva-photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,447 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Washington, DC
     
Jan 26, 2013 16:03 |  #13

Flash.
Once I started shooting Off-camera flash everything changed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 26, 2013 16:42 |  #14

Viva-photography wrote in post #15537015 (external link)
Flash.
Once I started shooting Off-camera flash everything changed.

Agreed, but OCF is not the same as a flash. Off camera flash requires at least a light stand and a set of triggers.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
melcat
Goldmember
1,122 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 26, 2013 17:04 |  #15

If your class provides studio flash, it will be much easier to learn with because of the modelling lights. In that case, there would be little point buying a Speedlight just for the class.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,396 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Starter gear - What's more critical, A better lens or Flash?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1129 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.