Taken a few shots recently of globular springtails with natural light at high ISO. Mags 3:1 to 5:1 and some focus stacking.
Brian v.
LordV Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006  More info | Jan 29, 2013 01:02 | #1 Taken a few shots recently of globular springtails with natural light at high ISO. Mags 3:1 to 5:1 and some focus stacking. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BasAndrews Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 29, 2013 01:33 | #2 |
mandokid1 Cream of the Crop  13,679 posts Gallery: 718 photos Best ofs: 4 Likes: 1109 Joined Nov 2010 Location: scarborough ontario canada More info | Jan 29, 2013 09:06 | #3 great set brian. DENIS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pri Goldmember  1,332 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2012 More info | Jan 29, 2013 16:25 | #4 Very nice set Brian...esp. like #2! http://www.facebook.com …raphyMauritius?ref=stream
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2013 00:44 | #5 Thanks all for the comments http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rrblint Listen! .... do you smell something?  More info | Beautiful shots Brian! Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alquimista Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 30, 2013 20:10 | #7 this little guys are so cool! la costura de Dios
LOG IN TO REPLY |
orionmystery Cream of the Crop  12,078 posts Likes: 771 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Malaysia More info | Jan 30, 2013 20:32 | #8 Great NL shots! Kurt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2013 00:55 | #9 Thanks again for the comments http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rstewart Senior Member  More info | Wonderful set Brian. Russ
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2013 16:40 | #11 Agreed! I like the dramatic lighting in #3. However, I think I would crop it about 50% and keep just the sharp areas. What do you think? Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2013 00:24 | #12 ed57gmc wrote in post #15557275 Agreed! I like the dramatic lighting in #3. However, I think I would crop it about 50% and keep just the sharp areas. What do you think? Thanks - think #3 would look like #4 if cropped ? http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2013 11:22 | #13 Yeah, that's the idea, but I like the lighting in 3 better. The hairs on his body and antenna stand out better with the dark background. 4 has a lot more glare behind him. This is getting nit picky, but, in 3, I also like the angle that the black/white transition makes across the frame. In 4, its more acute. Ed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WorcesterLad Goldmember  4,783 posts Likes: 168 Joined May 2011 Location: Worcester, UK More info | Feb 01, 2013 15:36 | #14 Lovely set, is it possible to see these weenie critters with the naked eye, Brian? George
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 02, 2013 00:37 | #15 ed57gmc wrote in post #15560224 Yeah, that's the idea, but I like the lighting in 3 better. The hairs on his body and antenna stand out better with the dark background. 4 has a lot more glare behind him. This is getting nit picky, but, in 3, I also like the angle that the black/white transition makes across the frame. In 4, its more acute. Yes ok see what you mean http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2722 guests, 146 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
