Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 29 Jan 2013 (Tuesday) 12:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Looking for some suggestions from the experts ...

 
pixel_junkie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 29, 2013 12:02 |  #1

Hi guys,

I'm traveling to San Francisco tomorrow to produce about 60 business portraits. The way I've been doing it so far is with two strobes and a reflector. One strobe goes to the front and slightly to the right of the subject for main light (through umbrella), reflector on the subject left for fill and the second strobe goes behind the subject top left as hair line strobe. Works great BUT I am missing the light behind the subject to separate them from the background just a little. it would make a big difference.

Can you guys think of a way to include a background light somehow with what I already have. Otherwise I'd have to buy another strobe and trigger for this.

Many thanks in advance!


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
Jan 29, 2013 12:19 |  #2

I would try to feather the main light more towards the backgriound or just use a speedlight.


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HiepBuiPhotography
Goldmember
1,612 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Jan 29, 2013 12:29 |  #3

Your second strobe (hair light) should be separating the subject a bit unless you're gridding it to hit the hair only.


Hiep Bui Photography | Harrisburg Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 29, 2013 12:30 as a reply to  @ flowrider's post |  #4

I was looking more for a rearrangement of the equipment I already have - maybe use the main light where I usually use it, front/right, then the second strobe as a background light and the reflector as hair light (if I can get enough light to it to reflect at all). Something like that.

I'm am trying to avoid sinking another grand into another strobe with another trigger since this isn't my main gig where I have almost no use for strobes ...


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 29, 2013 12:32 |  #5

HiepBuiPhotography wrote in post #15548348 (external link)
Your second strobe (hair light) should be separating the subject a bit unless you're gridding it to hit the hair only.

I was thinking about that. So, instead of pointing it to the subject entirely, I should position it in a way so some of the light spills on the background?


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Jan 29, 2013 12:45 |  #6

Pick a background that offers some natural separation. Then use your lights as usual.
Should be lots of options in an office.

There is always rental.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 29, 2013 12:56 as a reply to  @ dmward's post |  #7

I'm bringing my own background which is fashion gray


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HiepBuiPhotography
Goldmember
1,612 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Jan 29, 2013 13:14 |  #8

pixel_junkie wrote in post #15548356 (external link)
I was thinking about that. So, instead of pointing it to the subject entirely, I should position it in a way so some of the light spills on the background?

Yea, that would work. Maybe have the strobe lighting the background mostly and having it feather to hit the hair a bit.


Hiep Bui Photography | Harrisburg Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HiepBuiPhotography
Goldmember
1,612 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Jan 29, 2013 13:14 |  #9

What would also help is if you posted one of the older photos that you've used before with this setup.


Hiep Bui Photography | Harrisburg Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 29, 2013 13:41 as a reply to  @ HiepBuiPhotography's post |  #10

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

IMG_0067 (external link) by PIXEL+JUNKIE (external link), on Flickr

Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whortleberry
Goldmember
Avatar
1,719 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
     
Jan 29, 2013 13:56 |  #11

You can use an acrylic mirror tile to reflect light back onto the hair extremely efficiently. I have two which I fasten to stands with Photoflex clamps. You can even gel over the mirror but remember that you get double the strength you would if you gelled a light source. Here's a sample from 20 years ago.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/01/5/LQ_635003.jpg
Image hosted by forum (635003) © Whortleberry [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/01/5/LQ_635004.jpg
Image hosted by forum (635004) © Whortleberry [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Phil ǁ Kershaw Soho Reflex: 4¼" Ross Xpres, 6½" Aldis, Super XX/ABC Pyro in 24 DDS, HP3/Meritol Metol in RFH, Johnson 'Scales' brand flash powder. Kodak Duo Six-20/Verichrome Pan. Other odd bits over the decades, simply to get the job done - not merely to polish and brag about cos I'm too mean to buy the polish!
FlickR (external link) ◄► "The Other Yongnuo User Guide v4.12" by Clive Bolton (external link) ◄► UK Railway Photographs 1906-79 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HiepBuiPhotography
Goldmember
1,612 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Jan 29, 2013 14:00 |  #12

I just looked at the link you posted. Although the picture's a little small, from what I can tell, it looks like a pretty solid portrait to me. I would just do what you did there. I wouldn't change it. :D


Hiep Bui Photography | Harrisburg Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
Jan 29, 2013 15:59 |  #13

Yep. Nothing wrong with the OP's portrait. Good background separation and lighting. Stick with that. Less lights means less to go wrong.


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 29, 2013 17:58 as a reply to  @ flowrider's post |  #14

Thanks guys but I though a little extra light would have helped create this glow around the subject and would have created a better separation which would have made it even better.


Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixel_junkie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,013 posts
Likes: 143
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 29, 2013 18:01 as a reply to  @ pixel_junkie's post |  #15

Kinda like this chick:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Website (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,790 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Looking for some suggestions from the experts ...
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
651 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.