'64 Ford F100 292 *7 shots*

You've seen a few of Jerry's "OLDHIPE" pick-ups here. This is the "Tuesday Nite Line-up" line up of the "Trucks-R-Us" guys & gals.
Jerry's ( a 2nd Jerry) has had his '64 Ford F100 for 2 years. It came with the the 292 engine & it's numbers matching. 3-speed on the floor.

"Jerry's" trucks previously posted:
'53 Ford F-100 - 5 shots
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=112554
Coming soon: '57 Ford Ranchero 302

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

The hood + what's under it...

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

An interior for Bruce!

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Last one...

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

another stubby little beauty
I love the colour rather then the blue ,
love their shapes
lovely pictures Frank
again nice light you worked in

I love the tool trunk in the back. Probably comes in handy...

Well, it's there for anyone to use, Marie!
Just noticed, not too bad for ISO 800 with the 300D, are they?

PhotosGuy wrote:
Well, it's there for anyone to use, Marie!
Just noticed, not too bad for ISO 800 with the 300D, are they?

no , they are terrific
it's all about the guy with the camera

They look good. This is more evidence that a *good* exposure with a high ISO is better than trying to recover the details in an underexposed image. There's just something about the colors in the evening as well, that makes it worth the trouble.

As you all know, I think so too. I can't tell you how much I hate to see shots of peoples own car shot at noon, or with flash at night, when the best light is RIGHT THERE for you to use. With other peoples car you might not have a choice, but when you have the keys in your hand & the ability to move it?
Then there's the many times seen "Trees Growing Out Of The Roof" shots!

You could have tried a little harder, and gotten the "McDonalds Arches as an antenna shot" for the last one.

PhotosGuy wrote:
As you all know, I think so too. I can't tell you how much I hate to see shots of peoples own car shot at noon, or with flash at night, when the best light is RIGHT THERE for you to use. With other peoples car you might not have a choice, but when you have the keys in your hand & the ability to move it?

HTTP response: 403 | MIME changed to 'text/html'

but you also need the sun going down in a glow and not heavy grey skies at dusk Frank

not complaining of the skies , whatever they bring
but the shots need the sun going down like it ,
yes ?


no

jfrancho wrote:
You could have tried a little harder, and gotten the "McDonalds Arches as an antenna shot" for the last one.

ha ha ha
I'd love to see that

I'll see what I can do with that this year!

You're right. It's nice if there's some brightness & color in the sky, Marie. Like in the 6th shot, where the sun is already down.
This '37 Chevy PickUp from a week ago was under a solid overcast & I think it still looks better than a harsh sunlight shot. No?

PhotosGuy wrote:
I'll see what I can do with that this year!
You're right. It's nice if there's some brightness & color in the sky, Marie. Like in the 6th shot, where the sun is already down.
This '37 Chevy PickUp from a week ago was under a solid overcast & I think it still looks better than a harsh sunlight shot. No?

yes, I agree
it does look great there (the '37 Chevy) especially being the colour it is,
it seemly matched the sky
or just to say they 'complimented each other'

it's beautiful
(still)