Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 30 Jan 2013 (Wednesday) 12:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I need help deciding between two lenses

 
bent ­ toe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2012
     
Feb 01, 2013 01:29 |  #16

Sowsun, thanks for the input. Just as you described it, i stumbled upon a youtube clip last night showing the zooming mechanism (very new to me) never seen this before.
I believe that 28 and 80 are the only mm where the lens is at it's most extended.

Hopefully i get it today and can get an in-depth "review"


"High life on low budget"
bent photos (external link)Portfoliobox (external link)
X-Pro1 XF 35 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Feb 01, 2013 07:29 |  #17

bent toe wrote in post #15558887 (external link)
Sowsun, thanks for the input. Just as you described it, i stumbled upon a youtube clip last night showing the zooming mechanism (very new to me) never seen this before.
I believe that 28 and 80 are the only mm where the lens is at it's most extended.

Is this the video? https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=vsof4jhsD4c (external link)

It is pretty clear that the front element does not rotate as you zoom. It also has internal, rear Auto Focus, so I am quite certain that nothing changes when you AF.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bent ­ toe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2012
     
Feb 01, 2013 07:48 |  #18

msowsun wrote in post #15559405 (external link)
Is this the video? https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=vsof4jhsD4c (external link)

It is pretty clear that the front element does not rotate as you zoom. It also has internal, rear Auto Focus, so I am quite certain that nothing changes when you AF.

Yepp, thats the one.
Whats your take on this? Good/bad?
I'm totally new to this kind of lens behaviour.


"High life on low budget"
bent photos (external link)Portfoliobox (external link)
X-Pro1 XF 35 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Feb 01, 2013 08:42 |  #19

The ef 28-80mm 3.5-4.5 USM is a good lens and is very similar in build and Image Quality to:

24-85 USM
28-105 USM
35-135 USM
28-135 USM IS
70-210 USM

I found this link, and it says the that the front element DOES rotate and also extends slightly when focused: http://forums.dpreview​.com/forums/thread/633​891 (external link)

Now that I think about it, I do remember that the back of the lens was sealed unlike most other lenses in this class.

IMAGE: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17/msowsun/photo%20stuff/Photo10/_001-2aCompareRear_zps18ec7f71.jpg

The EF 28-80mm 3.5-5.6 is the only Ring Type USM lens I know that does this. It really isn't a problem at all if you put a filter extension on it. I also had an EF 28-70mm 3.5-4.5 II that did they same thing.

Many other lenses (eg. EF-S 18-55) also extend when you zoom, (and they also rotate when focused) but the front part does not retract into the front.

Here is a little more info: http://photo.net …gital-camera-forum/006jVR (external link)

Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bent ­ toe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2012
     
Feb 01, 2013 10:23 |  #20

msowsun wrote in post #15559610 (external link)
The ef 28-80mm 3.5-4.5 USM is a good lens and is very similar in build and Image Quality to:

24-85 USM
28-105 USM
35-135 USM
28-135 USM IS
70-210 USM

I found this link, and it says the that the front element DOES rotate and also extends slightly when focused: http://forums.dpreview​.com/forums/thread/633​891 (external link)

Now that I think about it, I do remember that the back of the lens was sealed unlike most other lenses in this class.

QUOTED IMAGE

The EF 28-80mm 3.5-5.6 is the only Ring Type USM lens I know that does this. It really isn't a problem at all if you put a filter extension on it. I also had an EF 28-70mm 3.5-4.5 II that did they same thing.

Many other lenses (eg. EF-S 18-55) also extend when you zoom, (and they also rotate when focused) but the front part does not retract into the front.

Here is a little more info: http://photo.net …gital-camera-forum/006jVR (external link)

What do you mean sealed? As in dust/water proof in the back by the metal mount?


"High life on low budget"
bent photos (external link)Portfoliobox (external link)
X-Pro1 XF 35 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Feb 01, 2013 10:37 |  #21

bent toe wrote in post #15559978 (external link)
What do you mean sealed? As in dust/water proof in the back by the metal mount?

Most consumer zoom lenses have an opening at the back where dust and other crap can enter. This 28-80 has a rear glass element that seals the rear of the lens completely.


IMAGE: http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17/msowsun/photo%20stuff/Photo10/_001bs_zps5e448f8b.jpg

Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bent ­ toe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2012
     
Feb 01, 2013 11:54 |  #22

Nice.


IMAGE: http://24.media.tumblr.com/d6b98b585181851aa9116f20a829e3ff/tumblr_mhjwa4ZLVv1rtbm54o1_500.jpg


Anyway, here are my first impressions of the 28-80 USM (original version).

I got it used, although it was in mint condition you could see the rubber has worn off a bit (whiteness in the rubber)and the innertube wasent the most sturdy one. Absolutly not loose or wobbly.. but at 30mm it sinks in to 28mm by it self.
The feel is great, same size as the 85mm.
Good feel of the zoom and focus rings.
As always, very fast in focus thanks to the USM.
The "in-tube" movement is kinda awkward and new to me, and i havent figured out if i like it or hate it. I guess Canon engineers thought it was a good thing.. time will tell.
I snapped a few shots in low light conditions, sharpness seems good at wide open and at 3.5
I'm gonna test it more this weekend in bright outdoor conditions.

Overall it seems as good as my 50/85 in buildquality and AF speed. Have to look for the sweetspot and do some closeup to see the sharpness in my images.
Will post some photos at the end of the weekend.


Edit*

Just took a few photos on 3.5 28mm, 4.5 50mm and 5.6 80mm, uploading now.

"High life on low budget"
bent photos (external link)Portfoliobox (external link)
X-Pro1 XF 35 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bent ­ toe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2012
     
Feb 01, 2013 14:08 |  #23

This are all shot indoor under artificial light.
Ok, here are the links to super big versions:

28mm f/3.5
http://www.flickr.com …2/sizes/m/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)

50mm f/4.5
http://www.flickr.com …6/sizes/m/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)

57mm f/5.0
http://www.flickr.com …3/sizes/m/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)

80mm f/5.6
http://www.flickr.com …1/sizes/m/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)

As you can see it has some CA in the "canon" text on the lenscap. Especially on the 28mm photo.
Sharpness looks ok too me.


"High life on low budget"
bent photos (external link)Portfoliobox (external link)
X-Pro1 XF 35 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Feb 01, 2013 14:13 |  #24

Yes, that looks pretty good, especially since it's wide open.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bent ­ toe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2012
     
Feb 01, 2013 14:16 |  #25

msowsun wrote in post #15560940 (external link)
Yes, that looks pretty good, especially since it's wide open.

Yea, but the CA/purple fringe scares me.. it's not even that big of a contrast.. wonder what it looks like photographing a tree against a blue sky.


"High life on low budget"
bent photos (external link)Portfoliobox (external link)
X-Pro1 XF 35 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Feb 01, 2013 14:20 |  #26

Try shooting the same scene with your 85mm 1.8 wide open and I think you will see that it is not so bad .


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bent ­ toe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,951 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2012
     
Feb 01, 2013 14:37 |  #27

msowsun wrote in post #15560970 (external link)
Try shooting the same scene with your 85mm 1.8 wide open and I think you will see that it is not so bad .

Hmm, on Sunday i will do some fieldtesting.


"High life on low budget"
bent photos (external link)Portfoliobox (external link)
X-Pro1 XF 35 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,308 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
I need help deciding between two lenses
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
668 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.