Juan A wrote in post #15563657
I am sorry, but I could not vote either. Poll is misleading it ask for a good phone yet the iPhone is not on there

Few companies exhibit as much software incompetence and get away with it as apple... I can only imagine of Adobe being the other one...
Some pointers:
itunes performance in Windows is worse than abysmally insulting.
Not per se a problem, except if free open source software is smaller, lighter, faster and more stable as well as reliable. (Foobar, VLC, SMPlayer).
Quicktime shows malicious behaviour by adding itself to the autoruns dialog every time it is run, plus is dead slow and has bad performance (the digital picture claimed a 2,5GHz Core2Duo couldn't play 5D MK II video footage (in Quicktime) - my Vaio could, with the Vista Codec Pack. Else have a look at VLC, SMPlayer - free, lighter and faster.)
Finally: How do you take a Unix derived OS and make is LESS secure than the product it was derived from? (Because that's what the apple OS is...)
Oh, and my comment about Adobe:
Why on Easth do I need to download the whole damned Lightroom software when the only update is to the lens profiles in the CameraRAW part? Modular design??? ... Anyway... enough of a rant...
PS: I actually hate apple - but the above, in its form is a fact. For all I know your software might run fine on an apple PC - apparently that is the claim... nevertheless, people in their own free time can make a significantly better product for Windows than a company with billions in cash? It sounds as ridiculous as it is...