Critique these photos please.
the composition, and the Post processing work
1.
2.
Jan 31, 2013 16:33 | #1 Critique these photos please. 2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 31, 2013 22:49 | #2 #1, did you intend the tower thing behind the car to be part of the photo? It seems a bit carelessly placed what with being partly hidden by the car. If you'd moved to the left so as to have both the car and the structure isolated, it would have been a stronger composition IMO. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jeremytf Member 212 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2010 More info | I agree with above... #1 has too much weight on the right and then empty void on the left. Step to the left and turn to get the water tank out of the center. #2 the car is ready to drive right out of the frame.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paul-t Goldmember 1,871 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: The deep south, that's the deep south of England. More info | Feb 01, 2013 00:36 | #4 Have to agree the pp looks a little odd, halo's/colours. I don't mind the water tank in the shot, but 1st shot there is a lot of clutter in the background. I would have moved to the right a little and shot from a much lower angle. 2nd shot front of the car is far to close to the r/h/s of thr frame. Again the background is to cluttered, shot from a lower angle loosing the buildings.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Feb 01, 2013 10:45 | #6 I agree with the above. Good start here. Don't forget that the little things are important, too. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scriveyn Goldmember More info | Feb 02, 2013 05:51 | #7 Looks like that car was in an accident - or is that messed up bumper a result of some pp editing? Frank, also known as jazzman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chrnat Senior Member 433 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Abu Dhabi More info | Feb 03, 2013 07:16 | #8 I see the car as a record shot only. I suspect that without the car the landscape might be more interesting Canon 1DX & 5d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skycolt Senior Member 411 posts Joined Apr 2012 More info | Feb 03, 2013 21:43 | #9 2 is better. the small tower in 1 is really distracting. for 2, I think you can leave more space on the right side instead of left 1D IV | converted 1000D | ever changing lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1053 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||