Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 01 Feb 2013 (Friday) 04:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why do Canon sensors tend to underexpose?

 
Miki ­ G
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 401
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ireland
     
Feb 01, 2013 04:58 |  #1

While using my grey card & metering in AV mode, the histogram on my two 7D's showed as being underexposed by 2/3rds of a stop. Does Canon deliberately calibrate their meters to behave like this, which seems strange as digital sensors tend to perform better when overexposing? I know that FEC can be used to compensate this, but why doesn't Canon get it to meter correctly while assembling their cameras?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Feb 01, 2013 05:19 |  #2

Miki G wrote in post #15559155 (external link)
While using my grey card & metering in AV mode, the histogram on my two 7D's showed as being underexposed by 2/3rds of a stop. Does Canon deliberately calibrate their meters to behave like this, which seems strange as digital sensors tend to perform better when overexposing? I know that FEC can be used to compensate this, but why doesn't Canon get it to meter correctly while assembling their cameras?

"metering in AV mode" ???

the "metering' is evaluative, spot, partial, center, etc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 01, 2013 06:40 |  #3

When you say "FEC" are you referring to "Flash Exposure Compensation", as in you are shooting with a flash?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Miki ­ G
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 401
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ireland
     
Feb 01, 2013 07:51 |  #4

tonylong wrote in post #15559287 (external link)
When you say "FEC" are you referring to "Flash Exposure Compensation", as in you are shooting with a flash?

I should have typed "Exposure compensation" instead of FEC, sorry.:oops: I'm shooting a grey card with natural light.

Regardless of which metering mode is being used, when I meter from a grey card, it is always showing on the histogram as being 2/3rds of a stop underexposed. I have also found this to be the case when editing shots previously taken. The histogram in the software also shows that the images are slightly underexposed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Feb 01, 2013 07:59 as a reply to  @ Miki G's post |  #5

Its true that Canon do meter to a slightly different "mid grey", but I'm surprised its as high as 2/3rds stop different.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 01, 2013 08:17 |  #6

How are you determining that "showing on the histogram as being 2/3rds of a stop underexposed"?

Here is a shot of a PhotoVision target per the camera meter...note the positions of the three spikes on the histogram for black with detail, midtone, and white with detail. My Canon 40D meter matches exactly what the Minolta incident hand held meter indicates, and it also happens to match exactly what my Minolta Spotmeter F reads when pointed to the same midtone grey.

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/sunlightas_shot.jpg

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Miki ­ G
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 401
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ireland
     
Feb 01, 2013 08:47 |  #7

The central spike is always 2/3rds of a stop to the left for some reason. I have to add 2/3rds when shooting to bring it to the central position so that my whites become white (without blowing the highlights).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 01, 2013 09:14 |  #8

Miki G wrote in post #15559619 (external link)
The central spike is always 2/3rds of a stop to the left for some reason. I have to add 2/3rds when shooting to bring it to the central position so that my whites become white (without blowing the highlights).

Many discussions have been held in the past over the years about the fact that the 18% gray card target results in not a true 'midtone' density, but that the 12% gray card target does.

Nevertheless, the ISO standard definition is what all meters are calibrated to. Yet, the ISO standard for both reflected meters and for incident meters have equations which incorporate a manufacturer-chosen Constant -- wouldn't that really be a 'variable', if the value is not fixed?! -- which causes different brands of meters to not match each other, and the variation between the meters can be about 1/3 EV!

That brings us back to a truism often cited, that meters offer a SUGGESTION. and not an absolutely right measurement, given the fact that shutter speeds vary, aperture sizes vary, even the light transmission of different lenses will not all be the same, so that our cameras cannot necessarily be absolutely accurate in reproducing the settings shown via the dials.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ernst-Ulrich ­ Schafer
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Port Angeleeeeeeees, WA
     
Feb 01, 2013 09:54 |  #9

Good post Wilt. You can have several bodies (same camera model) and many times the exposure readings won't be the same. Just learn the quirks your camera might have and adjust.


Today is the Day: Ruth Bernhard

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Feb 01, 2013 11:06 |  #10

Do this test. Take a picture of a grey card in spot or partial metering mode. Take note of the settings. Put the camera in manual and expose for three stops higher EV. Look at the histogram. Is the spike at the right? Then its correct. The meter goes for 12.5%, exactly three stops below the sensor's maximum, perfectly capture a scene with a 6 stop range. Is the scene greater than 6? Add negative EC. Is it less? Add positive EC.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john5189
Senior Member
598 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2008
     
Feb 01, 2013 11:17 |  #11

Miki G wrote in post #15559155 (external link)
While using my grey card & metering in AV mode, the histogram on my two 7D's showed as being underexposed by 2/3rds of a stop. Does Canon deliberately calibrate their meters to behave like this, which seems strange as digital sensors tend to perform better when overexposing? I know that FEC can be used to compensate this, but why doesn't Canon get it to meter correctly while assembling their cameras?

The metering mode you're in may make a difference.
Evaluative means the camera is assuming it is looking at a scene and it's algorithms have made a calculation.
I would expect spot, partial and Centre weighted should all read the same from a uniformly lit card(Edge vignetting might affect Centre weighted).
Just a thought


Wedding Photography in Herefordshire.  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Feb 01, 2013 16:52 as a reply to  @ john5189's post |  #12

My technique of shooting in manual mode based on ETTR while viewing the histogram in LV mode, after neutralizing all of the "shooting style" settings, does wonders for rendering all these types of questions totally moot.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Miki ­ G
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 401
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ireland
     
Feb 01, 2013 17:10 |  #13

Thanks to everyone for their suggestions and information. Very much appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Feb 01, 2013 21:12 |  #14

Wilt hit the nail on the head.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 02, 2013 11:48 |  #15

kfreels wrote in post #15562373 (external link)
Wilt hit the nail on the head.

Yeah, as much as I've heard people say that their camera "underexposes" or "overexposes" I haven't seen the "proof". What Wilt's post shows is what I've found by testing -- if you meter and expose something to be "centered"/medium, then the result will be slightly to the left on the histogram.

To me, the best way of testing this out is to fill your frame with a solidly-colored wall. Adjust your settings so that the meter "needle" is centered (in Manual, Av, Tv or P) then take the shot and check the histogram. Like I said the "spike" should be just slightly to the left (this is standard). If it's not, well, that means there is a problem and it could be fixed by Canon. When doing this filling the frame with a solid tone/color, the metering "mode" shouldn't matter, and in fact you could set the camera to Auto/Green Box and get the same results, assuming you don't have an in-camera setting that will "mess with" your shots.

When you are shooting a "scene", of course there will be a variety of tones, so that's where you learn to work with your metering and exposure methods.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,091 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Why do Canon sensors tend to underexpose?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1610 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.