http://www.canonpricewatch.com …mm-f2.8-IS-USM-price.html![]()
use the adorama link.
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Feb 01, 2013 20:56 | #1 http://www.canonpricewatch.com …mm-f2.8-IS-USM-price.html http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 01, 2013 21:16 | #2 Well that's more reasonable. I guess they realised no one wanted a slow, wide, $800 prime. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2013 21:18 | #3 Sirrith wrote in post #15562393 Well that's more reasonable. I guess they realised no one wanted a slow, wide, $800 prime. one possible myopic interpretation http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 01, 2013 21:44 | #4 Its probably the correct one though -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 02, 2013 00:17 | #5 Sirrith wrote in post #15562468 Its probably the correct one though ![]() How else does one explain the lack of reviews on the e-tailer websites, the lack of interest on flickr, the lack of interest on this board? ignorance http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 02, 2013 00:44 | #6 ed rader wrote in post #15562854 ignorance ? you sure do talk about them alot for not being interested. i remember when the sigmalux was the best 50mm you could own. that myth persisted for quite awhile and now that siggie prime has about as much esteem as a dog turd. keep following the herd...they're never wrong !I'm not interested in buying one, it doesn't follow that I am disinterested in what Canon is releasing since I am invested in the brand! -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Feb 02, 2013 12:59 | #7 ed rader wrote in post #15562854 ignorance ? you sure do talk about them alot for not being interested. i remember when the sigmalux was the best 50mm you could own. that myth persisted for quite awhile and now that siggie prime has about as much esteem as a dog turd. keep following the herd...they're never wrong !Are you perhaps a little defensive because you bought one? But if you disagree with the price commentary, then why did you wait until it went on sale? Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
botw Goldmember 1,157 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Potomac, MD More info | Feb 02, 2013 19:38 | #8 While only Canon knows, I think everyone expected the prices to fall on these stabilized primes. They couldn't have been selling many...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DonMadson Senior Member 360 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2005 Location: 07920 More info | Feb 02, 2013 21:52 | #9 See, Ed? No good deed goes unpunished... dmadson.photoreflect.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlGB77 Senior Member 556 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Delaware More info | Feb 03, 2013 10:18 | #10 So what is the general consensus on this lens? Canon 5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, T2i (2), 24-105 f4LIS, 17-40 f4L, 70-200f4L IS, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 2.8, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 50 1.8, 15-85 f4-5.6 IS, 60 2.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 430 EX II, 580 EX II, Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod w/ 498RC2, Calumet 8121 Tripod, Manfrotto 679B Monopod w/ 234 RC2 head
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vaflower Senior Member 855 posts Joined Sep 2012 Location: Massachusetts More info | Feb 03, 2013 11:06 | #11 KarlGB77 wrote in post #15567378 So what is the general consensus on this lens? Do you folks think it is a sharp lens? Thanks New IS primes are great optically, and they are light too. Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlGB77 Senior Member 556 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Delaware More info | Feb 03, 2013 18:09 | #12 Anyone else have any comments on this lens. Canon 5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, T2i (2), 24-105 f4LIS, 17-40 f4L, 70-200f4L IS, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 2.8, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 50 1.8, 15-85 f4-5.6 IS, 60 2.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 430 EX II, 580 EX II, Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod w/ 498RC2, Calumet 8121 Tripod, Manfrotto 679B Monopod w/ 234 RC2 head
LOG IN TO REPLY |
intence01 Member 144 posts Likes: 6 Joined Aug 2011 More info | Feb 04, 2013 00:21 | #13 Don't have any experience with this lens, and can see why it wasn't popular at the original price. Couple quick observations (both + and -)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cesium Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Feb 04, 2013 10:40 | #14 I'd be all over this if it were the 24mm version.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Feb 04, 2013 11:34 | #15 intence01 wrote in post #15569739 Don't have any experience with this lens, and can see why it wasn't popular at the original price. . f2.8 is zoom territory for many. Exceptions could be made for exceptional lenses, but the price was high enough it puts too many good (faster primes or f2.8 zooms) alternatives on the table. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1523 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||