Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Feb 2013 (Thursday) 17:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Check for decentering on your new lenses!

 
Canon_Lover
Goldmember
Avatar
2,673 posts
Likes: 101
Joined Jan 2011
Location: WA
     
Feb 07, 2013 17:48 |  #1

This is the 3rd lens I have received new lately which has been decentered. All Canon zoom lenses.

With the latest purchase of a telephoto zoom and UWA zoom lens, I could see even through the viewfinder of the 6D that one side was soft. After a round of test photos in various conditions with IS on and off, it remained always the same. The 15-85 was the worst decentering I have ever seen, but this one is just bad enough to bug me. My 16-35II, while softer in the corners by design, is at least equal enough to my eye, that I can tell no difference.

When you get a new lens. Go outside in good light and get the camera on a tripod or high shutter speed like 1/2000 th. Find an object with sharp details, like a license plate, and shoot it from around 50-100 feet away with the lens stopped down a little. Put it in all 4 corners for 4 photos and then import them into photoshop, cut them and put the corners next to each other. It should be apparent which side is softer if any. Do this for several different setups just to make sure it isn't a fault in your testing.

Next, send it back to Canon if off center. :lol:

I don't know if Canon has been slipping on QA lately or I just had bad luck. But in all the gear I have purchased in my life, I never had bad copies. Lately I have been sending faulty gear back way too often.

The black marks are to hide part of my neighbor's license plate. ;)

UWA = good to go! Even if soft in the corners, it is at least even, which is all I care about.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Telephoto zoom = BAD! So bad I noticed it looking in the viewfinder before testing.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrushka
"all warm and fuzzy"
Avatar
3,735 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Oct 2007
Location: OC, CA
     
Feb 07, 2013 18:38 |  #2
bannedPermanently

All on the same body?


http://www.paradigmpho​tographyoc.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agedbriar
Goldmember
Avatar
2,657 posts
Likes: 399
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Slovenia
     
Feb 08, 2013 08:09 |  #3

Andrushka wrote in post #15584659 (external link)
All on the same body?

Should be so, IMO, for the test to be conclusive.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,762 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Feb 08, 2013 08:12 as a reply to  @ agedbriar's post |  #4

I am confused it seems you mention your using a 6D and also a 15-85..how can you even do this the 15-85 is EF-s


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Invertalon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,495 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Feb 08, 2013 08:40 |  #5

My 24-70 II was decentered brand new. Right side of the image was softer no matter the aperture. Compared to the left which was very sharp.

I sent to Canon and they basically told me they could not correct it. So I exchanged the lens with who I bought it from. The replacement is perfect edge to edge. I was very happy with the exchange!

That was the only lens that I noticed any decentering issues with though. All lenses will have it to some degree (non are flawless, but some may be undetectable to the eye). As long as it is not obvious, no real problem.


-Steve
Facebook (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrushka
"all warm and fuzzy"
Avatar
3,735 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Oct 2007
Location: OC, CA
     
Feb 08, 2013 13:10 |  #6
bannedPermanently

agedbriar wrote in post #15586525 (external link)
Should be so, IMO, for the test to be conclusive.

05Xrunner wrote in post #15586532 (external link)
I am confused it seems you mention your using a 6D and also a 15-85..how can you even do this the 15-85 is EF-s

Exactly why I asked :D


http://www.paradigmpho​tographyoc.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Lover
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,673 posts
Likes: 101
Joined Jan 2011
Location: WA
     
Feb 09, 2013 13:29 as a reply to  @ Andrushka's post |  #7

My dad has a t1i. :D Which was getting a 15-85. But that lens sucks no matter is decentered or not. The lens barrel on those things allows zoom creep and the front element can't stay straight because the lens droops down when fully extended. Good optics, but the build quality is insufficient even for the price. I rented another one and it was the sloppiest POS I have ever seen, so they get even worse over time.

Both new zooms tested on 6D. 6D is flawless.

B&H are giving me another copy of 70-200.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Feb 09, 2013 14:22 |  #8

Canon_Lover wrote in post #15591374 (external link)
My dad has a t1i. :D Which was getting a 15-85. But that lens sucks no matter is decentered or not. The lens barrel on those things allows zoom creep and the front element can't stay straight because the lens droops down when fully extended. Good optics, but the build quality is insufficient even for the price. I rented another one and it was the sloppiest POS I have ever seen, so they get even worse over time.

Both new zooms tested on 6D. 6D is flawless.

B&H are giving me another copy of 70-200.

Something smells funny...

Why don't you tell us what lenses exactly you tested on which body?

And the 15-85 is regarded as a great lens...


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Lover
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,673 posts
Likes: 101
Joined Jan 2011
Location: WA
     
Feb 09, 2013 15:52 |  #9

pyrojim wrote in post #15591501 (external link)
Something smells funny...

Why don't you tell us what lenses exactly you tested on which body?

And the 15-85 is regarded as a great lens...

I appreciate that you guys are trying to help, but I am expert enough on gear to know that testing lenses should be done on the same body. :lol: :lol:


Both zoom L zooms tested on 6D. 15-85 in t1i.

The 15-85 is only good optically when not decentered. Other than that, the build quality of the zoom barrel is sub-par. Especially considering the price. Image quality when new is only a fraction of what makes a lens great. I am not the only person who feels this way about the 15-85's build quality. Most people I think who buy it, wouldn't care anyways about zoom creep and barrel wobble.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
Avatar
4,329 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 303
Joined Apr 2005
Location: London, centre of the universe
     
Feb 09, 2013 16:39 |  #10

My old 15-85 was also decentred slightly, although not as bad as the two copies of the 17-55 f/2.8 IS I had last year. Now it's something I always check for when I get a new lens.

As far as lens creep goes, I had two copies of the 15-85 and both had it. I lived with it though as the second copy I had was sharper than the first.


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon R7 | Canon EOS-M50 | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,128 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Check for decentering on your new lenses!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1081 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.