jmalonear Senior Member  651 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Corning, AR More info | Feb 01, 2014 23:13 | #1156 shankarhokie wrote in post #16655525  What an awesome shot!! Not that it is lacking any light, but Could you have used On Camera Flash??? Yeah looking back at it, I could have tried on camera flash. However, I have rarely been happy with on camera flash unless you can bounce it. Friends call me Jay!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 03, 2014 07:05 | #1157 jmalonear wrote in post #16656874 Yeah looking back at it, I could have tried on camera flash. However, I have rarely been happy with on camera flash unless you can bounce it. And thanks guys!! Hey guys. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Feb 03, 2014 09:55 | #1158 jmalonear wrote in post #16656874 Yeah looking back at it, I could have tried on camera flash. However, I have rarely been happy with on camera flash unless you can bounce it. And thanks guys!! Ordinarily thats true. But if you are just using a hint of fill, with a good balance of ambient, the on camera results can be surprisingly good.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shankarhokie Goldmember  1,894 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Saline, Michigan More info | Feb 04, 2014 07:43 | #1159 gonzogolf wrote in post #16660094 Ordinarily thats true. But if you are just using a hint of fill, with a good balance of ambient, the on camera results can be surprisingly good. Especially with a HSS capable ETTL flash when used with Av/Tv mode. YN468EX is awesome Shankar
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ThreeGuysPhoto Goldmember  1,401 posts Likes: 10 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Texas More info | Feb 04, 2014 09:49 | #1160 umphotography wrote in post #16659748 Hey guys. You should really have something like this in your bags. I agree with jay, On camera flash usually looks crappy. But you can get your flash off camera axis with one of these 3ft cords and your arm and solve lighting in tight spots like with one Jay was in. They have bailed my butt out a few times. http://www.bhphotovideo.com …Flash_Extension_Cord.html I just use a wireless trigger and speedlite setup with a LumiQuest SoftBox LQ-124. It has a cheap L bracket and some Velcro tape holding it all together. It also has a battery pack hooked up. I can hold it at arms length and it gives a somewhat soft light.  Britni by Wayne Weatherred, on FlickrExample using this light:  Britni by Wayne Weatherred, on Flickr-Wayne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rjharris Goldmember  More info | Feb 04, 2014 15:55 | #1161 ^^^ Hey Wayne, can you give me the location where you shot these? Might come in nice sometime.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Feb 04, 2014 15:56 | #1162 rjharris wrote in post #16663560 ^^^ Hey Wayne, can you give me the location where you shot these? Might come in nice sometime. Thanks. rjharris Looks like the riverwalk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ThreeGuysPhoto Goldmember 1,401 posts Likes: 10 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Texas More info | Feb 04, 2014 16:15 | #1163 rjharris wrote in post #16663560 ^^^ Hey Wayne, can you give me the location where you shot these? Might come in nice sometime. Thanks. rjharris gonzogolf wrote in post #16663564 Looks like the riverwalk This was shot in Los Colinas at the canals. We were scouting locations for some family pictures for the executives of a company located in the area. They require a permit ($50 I think) to shoot in some of the areas (not sure if the earlier picture was in one of those areas).  -Wayne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rjharris Goldmember More info | Feb 05, 2014 06:07 | #1164 ThreeGuysPhoto wrote in post #16663619 This was shot in Los Colinas at the canals. We were scouting locations for some family pictures for the executives of a company located in the area. They require a permit ($50 I think) to shoot in some of the areas (not sure if the earlier picture was in one of those areas). We ended up shooting them right by the Kid Kraddick studio which is an area that does require a permit. We added it to our session fee. Thanks, that's a little North for me but always good to keep that in mind.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shot this last fall and they are just making selections. Used a new smoothing technique on her skin. Let me know what you think  Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop  More info | Feb 06, 2014 16:12 | #1166 looks good to me. maybe a tad overexposed. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 06, 2014 16:16 | #1167 Looks pretty good. However, the top of her for head, near where the hair parts looks like it has not received enough attention
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 06, 2014 16:29 | #1168 Josh Young wrote in post #16669016 Looks pretty good. However, the top of her for head, near where the hair parts looks like it has not received enough attention  That was a really dry rough spot. I was a bit afraid to smooth that any more than i did. Found this technique from a guy named calvin Hollywood on the kelby site. Reallt cool way to smooth. Lights are bright. we used silver for effect. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
this one is warmed just a tad and dropped the highlights a little in LR  Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1803 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
