Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
Thread started 16 Feb 2013 (Saturday) 13:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Repro work: Reducing reflections in paintings

 
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 16, 2013 13:50 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Heya,

Anyone knows of a good way of killing reflections off paintings?

See my problem:

Full painting (external link)
Detail (external link)

It looks terrible. The polariser didn't help any, which means they're direct reflections. I can't move the painting from its fixed place; so I'm quite at a loss as to what to do.

Any ideas?

TIA


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Feb 16, 2013 13:55 |  #2

Are you familiar with the "family of angles" ?

http://www.digitalphot​opro.com …the-family-of-angles.html (external link)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 16, 2013 14:00 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Yes. Read that book already, but I'm having trouble applying the concepts, mainly because the texture of the paintings is multiplying the angles into a very extended family.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Feb 16, 2013 14:02 |  #4

Maybe need to soften your light then?


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 16, 2013 14:11 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Well, we tried with a white curtain, but the reflections remained.

Here, here's the layout of the church (external link). The pictures in red are the ones I was commissioned to photograph. The morning sun is coming from the right side of the picture (south side). I turned off all lights in the church. Station VI came out with reflections, but not as bad as the picture I linked to above, which is not being hit by the sun (!!). Yet, that's the one that came out worse. The painting of the Ascension, behind the altar is the best; there're still reflections on it, but they're relatively minimal:

Full painting (external link)
Detail (external link)
Detail (external link)

Station VI is terrible too:

Full painting (external link)
The soldier's raiment is totally washed out.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
farmer1957
Senior Member
Avatar
922 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 62
Joined Jul 2012
Location: nevada
     
Feb 19, 2013 09:58 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #6

I get the same thing with textured finish

IMAGE: http://i1110.photobucket.com/albums/h454/mortuarymike/IMG_0087_zps49652547.jpg
IMAGE: http://i1110.photobucket.com/albums/h454/mortuarymike/IMG_0085_zpsaa013d6a.jpg

IMAGE: http://i1110.photobucket.com/albums/h454/mortuarymike/IMG_0097_zps339ab3c3.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnPh
I smell like a Shoulder Shrugging Seal
Avatar
2,506 posts
Gallery: 210 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 2182
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Deepst darkest Cornwall
     
Apr 11, 2013 17:19 as a reply to  @ farmer1957's post |  #7

This might help, I remember bookmarking this page a while ago.

http://www.gyes.eu/pho​to/cross_polarization.​htm (external link)


ՕFlickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
serial underexposer
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Apr 11, 2013 18:07 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Yup, that's what I ended up doing. Thanks for the link, though: good information there. I've been playing with the cross polarising and have found some shots to come out way too dark, no matter the camera settings. I'll read on.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,962 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Repro work: Reducing reflections in paintings
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1650 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.