A little back story...I used to own the Sigma OS. It was my first 70-200 f2.8 lens, I loved it, but I lost my job so I had to sell it.
Now that I'm finally back to work I want to pick up another but I find myself wondering if I should save a little cash and get the HSM II instead (no matter which one I end up picking I will be buying used, so there is a $350-450 difference in price between the two). The problem is that while I've used the OS version I have never used the HSM II version.
In the research I've done I've read that that HSM II is prone to focus shift but less prone to focus breathing. Looking at DP's lens comparison charts it seems the HSM II is not as sharp as the OS at 200mm but is just as sharp or sharper in the lower focal ranges.
So honestly, to those who have used both the Sigma 70-200 HSM II and the Sigma 70-200 OS, is there a visible difference between the two when it comes to IQ (sharpness, color's, contrast, ect.) and how bad is the focus shift?


