are there any issues with communication between the 70-200 line and a T2i. cause I borrowed my uncles f4 IS and I felt like the auto focus was acting a little weird. any thoughts?
Canon11385 Member 135 posts Likes: 10 Joined Oct 2011 Location: NY More info | Feb 21, 2013 20:38 | #1 are there any issues with communication between the 70-200 line and a T2i. cause I borrowed my uncles f4 IS and I felt like the auto focus was acting a little weird. any thoughts? Im better behind the lens then in front of it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things" 57,724 posts Likes: 4057 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Feb 21, 2013 20:40 | #2 Shouldn't be, define weird. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2013 20:43 | #3 it was having trouble trying to focus on an object and sometimes I felt like the auto focus didn't move at times. when I asked my uncle if he had any problems with it (he has a 7d) he said no. Im better behind the lens then in front of it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2013 21:08 | #4 Was the focus point very close to you? That is the only time my 2.8 might have an issue. Minimum focus distance is 1-2 meters I think? _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
maverick75 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 21, 2013 21:11 | #5 Well natively the 7D has a better auto-focus than the T2i. But it still shouldn't be bad at all, unless you're shooting in dim light. - Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things" 57,724 posts Likes: 4057 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Feb 21, 2013 21:26 | #6 Dim light or low contrast. trying to focus on a white wall in full sunlight is also difficult. Though the 7D AF is better, there is no reason a t2i should not be able to focus other than dim light or poor contrast. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 21, 2013 23:38 | #8 Canon11385 wrote in post #15638016 and sometimes I felt like the auto focus didn't move at times. That statement concernes me a bit as the f4 IS's Af (actually it's not just the AF as it effect MF as well) has been known to crap out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ceegee Goldmember 2,335 posts Likes: 34 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Montreal, Quebec More info | Feb 22, 2013 07:32 | #9 Check the minimum focusing distance. There's a switch on the lens. Could be you're just too close to your subject. Gear: Canon R10, Canon RFS 18-150, Canon RF 100-400
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 22, 2013 14:42 | #10 I was able to manual focus so we are good there I was about 5 feet away to a lamp. Im better behind the lens then in front of it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things" 57,724 posts Likes: 4057 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Feb 22, 2013 15:50 | #11 Canon11385 wrote in post #15640888 I was able to manual focus so we are good there I was about 5 feet away to a lamp. Minimum focus distance of the 70-200 f/2.8 is right at 5 feet so it's very possible that you were below the minimums. It might have looked ok manually focused but still been a little bit off. Try it again a little farther away. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1391 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||