It's Already 2AM: 34rd Edition. Canon force is strong. Switch, Nick did not. YOLO !!

vipergts831 wrote in post #15975815
This is my favorite edit i did for the images.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/prodigy83/88448​89300/
sportograf-38270935 by Prodigy83, on Flickr

Okay. It's better than the average bear....

jdizzle wrote in post #15976436
Sony might release three FF mirrorless cameras.

http://www.mirrorlessr​umors.com …rom-sony-to-come-in-2014/

cool. more competition = better push for canon and nikon

jdizzle wrote in post #15976436
Sony might release three FF mirrorless cameras.

http://www.mirrorlessr​umors.com …rom-sony-to-come-in-2014/

I would be more inclined to believe it if the author knew how to write proper English.

LTNS, Julian.

The babies have decided to relocate to our smoker and use it as a toilet. If they're not careful I may have to see what smoked dove tastes like.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/94306936@N06/8​871510665/

dgrPhotos wrote in post #15976826
The babies have decided to relocate to our smoker and use it as a toilet. If they're not careful I may have to see what smoked dove tastes like.

http://farm6.staticfli​ckr.com/5455/887151066​5_697d6b8775_b.jpg
Baby Mourning Doves by dan@dgrphotos.com, on Flickr

Smoked squab for dinner?... well they're already at the smoker after all.

Harm wrote in post #15976406
so what next for Lance Omar? TDF?

Defending against multiple lawsuits, and riding his exercise bike in the basement

DTBaan wrote in post #15976469
cool. more competition = better push for canon and nikon

Yeah, but it's sony unless they'll take Nex lenses, nooooope

DTBaan wrote in post #15976469
cool. more competition = better push for canon and nikon

I hope so.

D. Vance wrote in post #15976551
I would be more inclined to believe it if the author knew how to write proper English.

If you've seen the reaction of people who bought the RX1, it makes sense for Sony to make this move.

Harm wrote in post #15976616
LTNS, Julian.

Hiya! My inactivity has been very minimal lately. We're in the middle of planning our ambulatory care services to another building off campus. It's very hectic right now. I hope all is well with you and your family.

krepta wrote in post #15975614
I'd love to live in Japan. Only thing is, I don't think I can learn the language to the point where I am proficient enough to hold a job there. I know enough to be able to watch Japanese dramas and anime, and listen to Japanese music, but I can't have a conversation. How well are you able to speak it?

no not yet, i am studying... and will be studying for the next 1.5 years. So i might be able to converse a little bit by then haha anyway I am just trying my luck jere and enjoying the moment at the same time.

Yep, before coming back last week, I hadn't logged in here for a year or something. Just very busy with work, personal projects, and other life things. I don't have more time now, but I'm trying to balance my time better.

The thread is not as explosive as before anymore... not as fast pace, specially lately so its OK now to check in once everyday or so.

Before it was way too fast for anybody not committed enough to follow the thread so I guess you lost interest as well.

Thanks the primes give quite an interesting look...but yeah I just started shooting streets, kinda makes me nervous to shoot people right on the face haha

krepta wrote in post #15975740
I don't believe Steven has a "normal" range.

You're not daring enough! What you do is compose for a scene in which they will inevitably enter, and snap the photo as soon as they appear. It's not your fault they walked into your frame at that exact moment.

I agree with this. Obviously, I wouldn't like a stranger taking an excessive amount of photos/video of me right up in my face, but if I'm out in public and it's one or two shots (or few seconds of video) because I look like an interesting subject, or if I just happen to be in the frame, no big deal.

The weirdest experience I've had in terms of photography in public was a couple asking me to take a photo of them with my camera, not for them to obtain a picture of themselves from me, but for me to have a nice memory of them on my vacation. I was dumbfounded, but I shot the photo, and they thanked me and went on their way. They didn't even ask to see the pic on the LCD screen.

I wear prescription glasses too. I was thinking that if there's a way to integrate Google glass or similar technology into prescription glasses that don't look like anything special, that would be the ultimate creeper tool, lol. Not that I would do anything creepy with such a device, nope, not at all... 0

haha if I can just sit and wait it out I would probably do that

I would love to take photos of these high school girls wearing tiny skirts... sometimes absurdly short.

jdizzle wrote in post #15976436
Sony might release three FF mirrorless cameras.

http://www.mirrorlessr​umors.com …rom-sony-to-come-in-2014/

I am not sure how the high end NEX are and how the current Sony lenses performs too but for some reason I found it pretty difficult to get used to the NEX-3 files back then. The control was horrible as well hehe of course its the lowest end model.

For some reason, I love Sony sensors on other brand cameras though

MOkoFOko wrote in post #15976942
Yeah, but it's sony unless they'll take Nex lenses, nooooope

hahaha

dgrPhotos wrote in post #15976826
The babies have decided to relocate to our smoker and use it as a toilet. If they're not careful I may have to see what smoked dove tastes like.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/94306936@N06/8​871510665/
Baby Mourning Doves by dan@dgrphotos.com, on Flickr

cute.

Wait smoker?

monk3y wrote in post #15977121
no not yet, i am studying... and will be studying for the next 1.5 years. So i might be able to converse a little bit by then haha anyway I am just trying my luck jere and enjoying the moment at the same time.


The thread is not as explosive as before anymore... not as fast pace, specially lately so its OK now to check in once everyday or so.

Before it was way too fast for anybody not committed enough to follow the thread so I guess you lost interest as well.


Thanks the primes give quite an interesting look...but yeah I just started shooting streets, kinda makes me nervous to shoot people right on the face haha

haha if I can just sit and wait it out I would probably do that

I would love to take photos of these high school girls wearing tiny skirts... sometimes absurdly short.

Just tell'em to ditch the skirts entirely. They just get in the way

Hey guys, is there any way to leave my long exposure noise reduction off on camera, and then turn it on in post? (RAW) I need to know fairly quickly, hoping to shoot a timelapse in a few minutes, and I can't wait 30 seconds after every shot for it to write.

D. Vance wrote in post #15977834
Hey guys, is there any way to leave my long exposure noise reduction off on camera, and then turn it on in post? (RAW) I need to know fairly quickly, hoping to shoot a timelapse in a few minutes, and I can't wait 30 seconds after every shot for it to write.

Yeah, pretty sure it can be reproduced to the same extent with software. And from my understanding, incamera noise red. doesn't actually affect RAW files?

Give this thread a read, covers a very similar scenario:
http://digital-photography-school.com …-reduction-good-idea.html

For night timelapse, I wouldn't be using noise reduction--though timelapse isn't exactly something I have a great deal of experience with.