It's Already 2AM: 34rd Edition. Canon force is strong. Switch, Nick did not. YOLO !!

pixiepearls wrote in post #15746773
I DID IT!! I selected CHECK OUT! by getting the cheaper lens, I was able to get other goodies I've wanted. $1,500 was my budget. So I got some stuff I've wanted for a long while!!!!

Order Information:
Quantity Description Price Total Qty: 1
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM AutoFocus Telephoto Lens - USA
(SKU CA1352AF) Free shipping!Rebates available
Qty: 1
Lastolite Joe McNally 24" White Ezybox Hotshoe, Small Flash Diffuser
(SKU LSLS2462JM)
Qty: 1
Canon Speedlite 430EX II Flash with Guide Number 141 Feet / 43m at ISO 100 - U.S.A. Warranty
(SKU CA430EX2U) Free shipping! Video Rebates available
Qty: 1
Westcott Pro 8' Free Sliding Lightstand with 5/8 Mounting Stud, 4 Sections with 3 Risers, Black Anodized.
(SKU WELS8)

Congrats on the 135.

vipergts831 wrote in post #15747015
Lowest possible.

Why is that? I am always at the highest, to get the sharpness SOOC. I was wondering what others do, and what the benefits are.

D. Vance wrote in post #15747034
Why is that? I am always at the highest, to get the sharpness SOOC. I was wondering what others do, and what the benefits are.

Bcoz' you can add sharpening in post but, I have to remember that you only shoot jpeg and not RAW.

http://jacobskoglund.4​ormat.com/571384

What about this? It's really my only option at this point since I can't find one that is perfect.

laxlife1234 wrote in post #15747089
http://jacobskoglund.4​ormat.com/571384

What about this? It's really my only option at this point since I can't find one that is perfect.

I like the layout. Not sure about the picture though, the fact that his entire face is covered by the smoke is just sort of meh. IMO you have better shots to put there.

*sigh* wrote in post #15747123
I like the layout. Not sure about the picture though, the fact that his entire face is covered by the smoke is just sort of meh. IMO you have better shots to put there.

Thanks! Well I'm actually going to have to disagree on the picture personally only because it's my personal favorite. Curious though, which one would you choose? I wasn't truly set on putting that one up, I just did cause I was playing favorites

laxlife1234 wrote in post #15747136
Thanks! Well I'm actually going to have to disagree on the picture personally only because it's my personal favorite. Curious though, which one would you choose? I wasn't truly set on putting that one up, I just did cause I was playing favorites

IDK I'd have to sort through. To me with the face completely covered up it makes me question what's actually the subject in the picture. It's just a faceless guy smoking. You could even do one of your portraits, to give your home page some color. But I mean it's really stylistic differences, the layout is substantially better, the look is up to you.


I like the new one better

*sigh* wrote in post #15747165
IDK I'd have to sort through. To me with the face completely covered up it makes me question what's actually the subject in the picture. It's just a faceless guy smoking.


I like the new one better

Yeah, I gotcha - I guess it's a more subjective image cause that's what makes it interesting to me

The image I'm guessing is the one with the kids looking up you're referring to?

laxlife1234 wrote in post #15747173
Yeah, I gotcha - I guess it's a more subjective image cause that's what makes it interesting to me

The image I'm guessing is the one with the kids looking up you're referring to?

Yeah. Like I said, it's all just stylistic differences and what people are drawn to. If you like it, use it.

Yeah that's the one.

The other option is to have a few pictures cycling so your homepage isn't so static. But that complicates things quite a bit more.


BTW the link to your page in your signature doesn't work.

D. Vance wrote in post #15747034
Why is that? I am always at the highest, to get the sharpness SOOC. I was wondering what others do, and what the benefits are.

Because I can't control how the camera is applying sharpening. I don't like to apply it universally to an image but rather select parts of it.

*sigh* wrote in post #15747185
Yeah. Like I said, it's all just stylistic differences and what people are drawn to. If you like it, use it.

Yeah that's the one.

The other option is to have a few pictures cycling so your homepage isn't so static. But that complicates things quite a bit more.


BTW the link to your page in your signature doesn't work.

My portfolio? Really? It works for me?...

But I wish I could do a slideshow, but the site doesn't have that option and I have no clue how I would write a script that could do something like that. Oh and do you know how to write advanced code and algorithms or stuff like that? I'm looking for some references as to where I can get started and learn all the basics.

whats new everyone!

vipergts831 wrote in post #15747198
Because I can't control how the camera is applying sharpening. I don't like to apply it universally to an image but rather select parts of it.

Omar lets see pictures of your new bike!!!

laxlife1234 wrote in post #15747206
My portfolio? Really? It works for me?...

But I wish I could do a slideshow, but the site doesn't have that option and I have no clue how I would write a script that could do something like that. Oh and do you know how to write advanced code and algorithms or stuff like that? I'm looking for some references as to where I can get started and learn all the basics.

Strange... it's working now. It wasn't before.

And no, I don't really know all that much, I had a few classes back in college but it was more basic HTML, CSS stuff.

SUB1IM388 wrote in post #15747226
whats new everyone!

Hey Danny!

SUB1IM388 wrote in post #15747231
Omar lets see pictures of your new bike!!!

Seriously!

Pixel peepers... UNITE!

https://dl.dropbox.com​/u/7971694/pixel_peepe​rz.jpg