Hi guys!
Here is my big dilemma:
I usually shoot: Motorport (Rally), and Portraits. (aprox 50-50%)
And I was thinking of buying a Canon 7D + 24-105 F4 L + 50mm 1.4
I LOVED my 24-105 on my 40D.
So I know this is a great combination for both, and I was planning to buy a 7D and a 24-105 f/4 L IS plus a 50mm f1.4
Yet one of my friends suggested, I should buy a 5DMkII with a 70-200 f/2.8 L (non-IS), and I started thinking, if I would stretch my budget to the maximum, I could buy the 5D2...
You guys know how it is... And now I have a big dilemma.
With the 5D I would have with the 70-200 as a 45-125mm lens (on a crop).
That is not bad, as I use this focal lenght a lot (portraits, and sport).
The 5D lacks the AF system of the 7D, wich I was really looking for the most.
Yet the 5D is full frame = better IQ, better Bokeh, Larger picture, etc...
How good and reliable is the 5DMkII AF system (Compared to the 40D)?!
I do not usually shoot bursts, so the 8fps does not matter that much to me.
I shoot mainly rally events, where I can get close to the subjects, so I do not need a "super-telephoto" lens.
But I would lack the 24-40mm range (crop), altough I have a 28-70mm lens (hazy:cry
, but I would need to change lenses in this case.
And I would lack the 50mm f/1.4, altough in 2-3 months I could get that lens.
So guys, what do you say?! Is FF really worth it, or should I forget it, and get the 7D?
Thanks.
Roland.
EOS 7D + 24-105 f/4 L IS + 50mm f/1.4


