Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Mar 2013 (Wednesday) 15:40
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Wich one?!"
EOS 7D + 24-105 f/4 L IS + 50mm f/1.4
12
36.4%
EOS 5D Mk II + 70-200 f/2.8
21
63.6%

33 voters, 33 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5D2+70-200 vs 7D+24-105

 
NemethR
Senior Member
Avatar
876 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 270
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Pécs, Hungary
     
Mar 06, 2013 15:40 |  #1

Hi guys!

Here is my big dilemma:

I usually shoot: Motorport (Rally), and Portraits. (aprox 50-50%)

And I was thinking of buying a Canon 7D + 24-105 F4 L + 50mm 1.4
I LOVED my 24-105 on my 40D.
So I know this is a great combination for both, and I was planning to buy a 7D and a 24-105 f/4 L IS plus a 50mm f1.4

Yet one of my friends suggested, I should buy a 5DMkII with a 70-200 f/2.8 L (non-IS), and I started thinking, if I would stretch my budget to the maximum, I could buy the 5D2...
You guys know how it is... And now I have a big dilemma.

With the 5D I would have with the 70-200 as a 45-125mm lens (on a crop).
That is not bad, as I use this focal lenght a lot (portraits, and sport).

The 5D lacks the AF system of the 7D, wich I was really looking for the most.
Yet the 5D is full frame = better IQ, better Bokeh, Larger picture, etc...
How good and reliable is the 5DMkII AF system (Compared to the 40D)?!


I do not usually shoot bursts, so the 8fps does not matter that much to me.
I shoot mainly rally events, where I can get close to the subjects, so I do not need a "super-telephoto" lens.
But I would lack the 24-40mm range (crop), altough I have a 28-70mm lens (hazy:cry:), but I would need to change lenses in this case.
And I would lack the 50mm f/1.4, altough in 2-3 months I could get that lens.

So guys, what do you say?! Is FF really worth it, or should I forget it, and get the 7D?

Thanks.
Roland.


Roland | Amateur Photographer
Nikon D850 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8G ED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dbersh
Member
30 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Mar 06, 2013 18:22 |  #2

I don't understand your 70-200 equals 45-125 on crop. It is the other way, on 7D crop body the FOV is 112-320. On a full frame FOV is 70-200.
I have the 5Dc for landscapes and just picked up the 7D for sports...


5D w/BG-E4, 7D w/BG-E7,17-40 L, 70-200 2.8 L IS, nifty-fifty, Canon 1.4 TC, 580 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
h14nha
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 179
Joined Nov 2008
Location: South Wales, UK
     
Mar 06, 2013 19:06 |  #3

As I suspect you'll be shooting at low'ish ISO, you won't see much if any difference really anyway. For motorsports the 7d is the way to go.


Ian
There's no fool like an old skool fool :D
myflickr (external link)
My Gear - 7d, / 16-35mm F4 / 70-200 2.8 II / 100-400 / 300mm 2.8 / 500/4 :D XT-1 Graphite 18/35/56

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
T2iGuy
Member
Avatar
139 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Mar 06, 2013 21:29 |  #4

Dbersh wrote in post #15685150 (external link)
I don't understand your 70-200 equals 45-125 on crop. It is the other way, on 7D crop body the FOV is 112-320. On a full frame FOV is 70-200.
I have the 5Dc for landscapes and just picked up the 7D for sports...

I think he means to have a FOV of 70-200 on a crop he needs a lens with the FOV with 45-125


GEAR: T2i

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NemethR
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
876 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 270
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Pécs, Hungary
     
Mar 07, 2013 10:54 |  #5

Dbersh wrote in post #15685150 (external link)
I don't understand your 70-200 equals 45-125 on crop. It is the other way, on 7D crop body the FOV is 112-320. On a full frame FOV is 70-200.
I have the 5Dc for landscapes and just picked up the 7D for sports...

My calculation is:
If I mount a 70-200 lens on a FF body, it would give me the same FOV as a 45-125 lens on a Crop body would give :)


Roland | Amateur Photographer
Nikon D850 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8G ED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NemethR
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
876 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 270
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Pécs, Hungary
     
Mar 07, 2013 10:58 |  #6

Thank you guys, for the replies.

I have been using a 40D, with its 9 point AF system, I was OK with it, when shooting motorsport, the 5D2 has the "same" 9 point AF system as the 40D, the question is, is the 5D2 AF system reliable?! (AI-Servo mode)

Is it better or worse, then that of the 40D (50D)?

The second question:
Does FF really make such a big difference in portrait Photography?
How much difference is there?! (Bokeh, sharpness, etc.?)

Thanks in advance.


Roland | Amateur Photographer
Nikon D850 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8G ED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dbersh
Member
30 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Mar 07, 2013 11:03 |  #7

NemethR wrote in post #15687577 (external link)
My calculation is:
If I mount a 70-200 lens on a FF body, it would give me the same FOV as a 45-125 lens on a Crop body would give :)

That is not correct. A crop body increases the FOV by the size of the sensor. For 7D that is 1.6. You multiple that. 70 x 1.6 = 112 and 200 x 1.6 = 320
I think the 1D series maybe 1.3 but may be mistaken on that. The 6D and 5D series are full frame so no additional factoring.


5D w/BG-E4, 7D w/BG-E7,17-40 L, 70-200 2.8 L IS, nifty-fifty, Canon 1.4 TC, 580 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NemethR
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
876 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 270
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Pécs, Hungary
     
Mar 07, 2013 11:07 |  #8

A Crop at 45mm equals 72mm on FF (45*1,6=72)
125mm Crop = 200mm FF (125*1,6=200)

Or am I really mistaken?

Also Dbersh, i see you have both 5D and 7D, if you could only have one, wich one would it be?!


Roland | Amateur Photographer
Nikon D850 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8G ED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dbersh
Member
30 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Mar 07, 2013 11:22 |  #9

You are mistaken. There is no factor on full frame. 45 on full frame is 45. A 45 on a crop sensor like 7D is 72.
I use my 5D for landscapes and portraits, my 7D I use primarily for sports for the extra reach of the crop and the 8fps. If I had to pick just one that would be tough but I guess the 7D, I could get lenses to accommodate for my landscapes, plus I have the 5D classic, if it was the ii or iii I may have a different answer, maybe someone else can chim in as well who has a newer 5D and 7D with their thoughts.


5D w/BG-E4, 7D w/BG-E7,17-40 L, 70-200 2.8 L IS, nifty-fifty, Canon 1.4 TC, 580 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
remotehuman
I'm not into that
Avatar
877 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 258
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Quincy, MA
     
Mar 07, 2013 11:22 |  #10

You're backwards, a Crop at 70 equals about 44 on a full frame, thus the crop. If you were looking into a 70-200 in a full frame view finder at 70mm you see at 70mm exactly. A crop body looking into the viewfinder at 70mm you see just a portion of what you saw in the full frame viewfinder. That gives the effect of 'more zoom' for a lack of better words. That 70 on the crop is actually 112mm full frame equivalent


R5 / RF 28-70 F2L / RF 70-200 F2.8L

flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon_Doh
Senior Member
Avatar
878 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 68
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Pyongyang, North Korea
     
Mar 07, 2013 11:24 |  #11

How about neither? Both of those cameras feature old technology. Have you considered the 6D?


I use a Kodak Brownie

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NemethR
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
876 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 270
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Pécs, Hungary
     
Mar 07, 2013 11:38 |  #12

Jon_Doh wrote in post #15687683 (external link)
How about neither? Both of those cameras feature old technology. Have you considered the 6D?

No, it uses a SD card, no way I am going to buy that. :)
(Not after using my CF cards for years without any problems, and seeing some SDHC cards that broke down.)

Also CF is much faster.


Roland | Amateur Photographer
Nikon D850 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8G ED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yogi ­ Bear
Goldmember
1,492 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: League City, TX USA (Houston)
     
Mar 07, 2013 17:29 |  #13

NemethR wrote in post #15687624 (external link)
A Crop at 45mm equals 72mm on FF (45*1,6=72)
125mm Crop = 200mm FF (125*1,6=200)

Or am I really mistaken?

Also Dbersh, i see you have both 5D and 7D, if you could only have one, wich one would it be?!

No, you are not mistaken. 70-200 on FF will be the equivalent of 45-125 on crop.


Canon EOS 7D | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS |
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | 250D | EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | 580 EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Mar 07, 2013 17:33 |  #14

NemethR wrote in post #15687741 (external link)
No, it uses a SD card, no way I am going to buy that. :)
(Not after using my CF cards for years without any problems, and seeing some SDHC cards that broke down.)

Also CF is much faster.

Even if IQ and AF are better? :confused:


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NemethR
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
876 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 270
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Pécs, Hungary
     
Mar 08, 2013 15:34 |  #15

Sirrith wrote in post #15689138 (external link)
Even if IQ and AF are better? :confused:

If I had the money, then I would rather consoder a 5D3, but, the 6D is also more expensive then the 5D2. So since the 5D2 is the maximum for my budget, I did not consider the 6D.

And to be honest there is really nothing "intersting" to me in the 6D.

7D is interesting for the much improved AF system.
The 5D2 for the FF.


Roland | Amateur Photographer
Nikon D850 | Nikon D80 | Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8G ED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,332 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
5D2+70-200 vs 7D+24-105
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1506 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.