Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Mar 2013 (Thursday) 05:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

what is the perfect camera for the MP-E 65 Macro lens

 
moltengold
Goldmember
4,296 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2011
     
Mar 07, 2013 05:21 |  #1

Hi all
is it the FF bodies
or the crop ?
and which one ?
i need a clear details in the photos
Thanks


| Canon EOS | and some canon lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Mar 07, 2013 11:03 |  #2

The MP-E65 is seriously sharp and will work fine on any body. I would choose according to the likely size of your subject - since the lens cannot come back further than 1:1, it gives a bigger coverage on FF than it does on crop. In other words you can't fit something bigger than 22mm across the crop frame, but you can go up to 36mm subjects using a FF camera. Conversely if you want maximum magnification then the crop gives you the same framing advantage it does with long telephoto lenses.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moltengold
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,296 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2011
     
Mar 07, 2013 11:11 |  #3

Thanks a lot Mark


| Canon EOS | and some canon lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
w0m
Goldmember
1,110 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Nov 2011
     
Mar 07, 2013 15:59 as a reply to  @ moltengold's post |  #4

Also; with equal framing, I believe you will get a larger DOF on say; a 7D than on a 6D. Can make it easier to get more of the subject in focus.


[6D]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shadowcat
Senior Member
Avatar
855 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Elyria,Ohio
     
Mar 07, 2013 16:25 |  #5

I would say the 7D it gives you more magnification and gives you a better chance of catching a bug flying or licking something due to the fast FPS.


Canon 5D MK2 with grip,7D w/grip,G1x,300mm 2.8is, 35 1.4L, 24-70 2.8II, 85 1.8, 70-200L 2.8 is, 100L macro, 2x& 1.4 tele, canon pro9000 printer, 600ex-rt,580ex 2 flash, macro flash
my photo's http://s335.photobucke​t.com/albums/m476/oneb​adkitty1969/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moltengold
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,296 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2011
     
Mar 07, 2013 16:35 |  #6

thanks w0m and shadowcat


| Canon EOS | and some canon lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Needsnow
Goldmember
Avatar
1,814 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Nebraska
     
Mar 07, 2013 17:16 |  #7

I have used the 7D, T3i and the T4i takes the prize! It allows the lens to be positioned in any way, and I can work with the camera totally from the rotating touch screen......here is a recent winter example...

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/03/1/LQ_639930.jpg
Image hosted by forum (639930) © Needsnow [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon EOS R

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ K
Goldmember
Avatar
1,637 posts
Joined Apr 2001
Location: San Francisco area
     
Mar 07, 2013 17:24 |  #8

The MPE 65 is a real challenge to use. The dof is really thin, so you may want a focusing rail to move the camera forward/backwards a fraction of a mm. I hope you were counting on using a tripod. You certainly will need a body with a good (~1M dots) Live View, fortunately thats just about any Canon Body in the last 4 years. Some of the LV screens are fractionally larger than others. Crop will allow a greater distance from the subject, which is often an issue with getting enough light onto the subject with a really near filed macro. Conversely FF will have less noise, all things equal.
Mike K


Canon 6D, 1DmkII, IR modified 5DII with lots of Canon L, TSE and Zeiss ZE lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Mar 07, 2013 17:25 |  #9

That's a great snowflake shot. I use an angle finder if I need to, but I guess the swivel screen is even more convenient, using liveview.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Needsnow
Goldmember
Avatar
1,814 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Nebraska
     
Mar 07, 2013 17:27 |  #10

Swivel screen, with liveview and TOUCH is sweet!


Canon EOS R

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
botw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,157 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Potomac, MD
     
Mar 07, 2013 19:10 |  #11

I like it on my M, but the t4i would probably be my choice if I have one. Otherwise, something with a large bright viewfinder because it can get very dark at high mag.


www.gc5photography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,420 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4508
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 07, 2013 19:19 |  #12

shadowcat wrote in post #15688923 (external link)
I would say the 7D it gives you more magnification and gives you a better chance of catching a bug flying or licking something due to the fast FPS.

In truth, if a lens gives 1:1 magnification, it does so irregardless of format size!

  • A 14.9mm tall object will fully fit in the frame of 14.9mm APS-C frame height when at 1:1, and the same object will be 14.9mm tall in the FF sensor as well, but we are able to see another 9.1mm of surrounding area in the FF image.
  • A 24mm tall object will not be fully captured within the 14.9mm frame height of APS-C, but it will fit the full frame height of the 24mm x 36mm FF image.
If you size the image so that the object fully fills the frame...
  • A 14.9mm tall object will be 14.9mm on the APS-C frame, ergo it is captured at 1:1 (1x)
  • A 14.9mm tall object will be 24mm in the FF image, ergo it is captured at 1.61:1 (1.61x)
So that object ends up at HIGHER MAGNIFICATION in the larger frame area, as captured on the sensor (which is how macro magnification is defined)!

But of course, if using a macro lens that can achieve only 1:1, you would have to mount it on an extension tube in order to achieve 1.6x with that lens.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,717 posts
Likes: 4035
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 07, 2013 19:21 |  #13

w0m wrote in post #15688821 (external link)
Also; with equal framing, I believe you will get a larger DOF on say; a 7D than on a 6D. Can make it easier to get more of the subject in focus.

Hmm.. This is worth an experiment. I believe that the FF would actually give you more DOF if using the whole frame but if you try and frame them the same then maybe not. This is worth an experiment. :)

shadowcat wrote in post #15688923 (external link)
I would say the 7D it gives you more magnification and gives you a better chance of catching a bug flying or licking something due to the fast FPS.

There is no way that you are going to be able to get bug in flight with this lens. Even at 1:1 the working distance is quite small and the DOF is really really small.at 5:1 the working distance is maybe an inch or so. You might get really lucky, but I'm not seeing it happen.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,420 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4508
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 07, 2013 19:30 |  #14

gjl711 wrote in post #15689498 (external link)
Hmm.. This is worth an experiment. I believe that the FF would actually give you more DOF if using the whole frame but if you try and frame them the same then maybe not. This is worth an experiment.

gjl711, if you refer to my immediately prior post, if using a lens on both APS-C and FF and 'filling the frame' (what I assume was meant by 'equal framing'), the FF image needs to capture the object at higher magnification in order to fill its larger frame, so as captured there is LESS DOF from the larger image. But if we then produce an 8x12" print from both images, when have to enlarge the APS-C image by 1.6x greater magnification, thereby the end result (the print) has identical DOF...one was enlarged 1.6x during shooting, the other was enlarged 1.6x during printing, yielding identical results!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Mar 07, 2013 19:31 |  #15

I don't have the T4i, so this may be a dumb question...

I can see where having an articulated LCD would be handy for macro shooting, and I can see how the touch sceen would be useful with an autofocus lens... But how is the touch screen helpful with a manual focus lens such as the MP-E?


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,817 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
what is the perfect camera for the MP-E 65 Macro lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1332 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.