To be 100% honest, since I have switched to my Mark III from my 30D.....I have not experienced 100% satisfaction with my image quality. At least no where close to where I was with my 30D. For years, I shot the 30D and used a ton of different rental glass. Mostly the 100-400L, but often several versions of the 70-200L also. I had a very high keeper rate of some great and sharp action photos. Obviously capturing stationary items were no task, if action shots were on point.
Before I picked my Mark III up, I purchased a 100-400L from a friend. I used this on my 30D and achieved great and sharp photos with that combo. Now I have been primarily using the 100-400L on my Mark III.....and have yet to come away with a days shooting with a satisfied feeling. Even stationary subjects, I've found to have to add a little sharpness here and there.....nothing that has really blown me away with sharpness/detail out of the camera.
I've been discussing with several friends and even a few members on here, about sending my lens/body to Canon and have them take a look. I've tried myself with the microadjustment.....thought I had gotten that pretty spot on, and had no better luck. I'm going to end up swapping my 100-400 with a friends 70-200 f4 for a few weeks, to see how each others results are (he has a 7D, and his images with his 70-200 are razor sharp). I guess that will be proof enough there....
I'd like to see if any of you Mark III owners, or really anyone with experience, might give me your evaluation of what I am experiencing.....hopefully from experience yourself. Am I a total idiot? Am I overlooking some obvious things? Might I have a Mark III in need of repair? Feel free to add anything needed, to help me get in the right direction. At this point, I am looking for any help possible.
Below is a sample image from yesterday. Tripod and remote shutter used, IS was off, 120mm, 1/1600.......and the image is poop.
http://jonsmithphoto.com/darren/host/fountain-5.jpg![]()
Any help/feedback is appreciated!




