Didnt like the tree branch sticking out of her leg: does the edit look ok?
ORIGINAL
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
With branch and shadows removed
RockyRhode Goldmember 1,416 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Sacramento More info | Mar 11, 2013 19:43 | #1 |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Mar 11, 2013 21:28 | #2 Nicely done....I would rotate it to the right a bit to straighten, reduce saturation a bit and use a dodge tool to bring out her face a bit more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
abbypanda Goldmember 1,804 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Mar 11, 2013 21:37 | #3 I think it's a good edit, the blues are overdone in my opinion
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 12, 2013 06:38 | #4 The edit is a bit obvious. It is apparent that you cloned the same tree twice. When doing this it is better to pull the clone elements, assuming you can keep it looking natural, from more than one area. Also if you create a second layer, you can do the cloning there and then use the erase tool at varying percentages to make the retouching blend better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 12, 2013 12:02 | #5 aboudd wrote in post #15705650 The edit is a bit obvious. It is apparent that you cloned the same tree twice. When doing this it is better to pull the clone elements, assuming you can keep it looking natural, from more than one area. Also if you create a second layer, you can do the cloning there and then use the erase tool at varying percentages to make the retouching blend better. Thank you; that is exactally the kind of feedback I was hoping for
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 12, 2013 21:34 | #6 I would also suggest opening up the shadows a bit after toning down the saturation, which looks quite heavy to me. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saea501 ... spilled over a little on the panties More info | It does look a bit dark and saturated. I think the pose is a little awkward too. Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rivas8409 Goldmember 2,500 posts Likes: 586 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Lemoore, California More info | Mar 13, 2013 11:23 | #8 It's a decent job of cloning. Someone other than those on this forum would probably not be able to see it. Compostion and exposure hosever are a different story. it took me a minute to realize that's she's more-than-likely a gymnist. As already stated her face is too dark and the perspective is off fo rme. I would have prefered the shot straight on...but it appears to be from a angle. Also, I think getting up higher would be benfeicial as well. Body: Canon 5DmkII│Canon M50
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1643 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||