Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 13 Mar 2013 (Wednesday) 15:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Paper vs. Photoshop Paper Dimensions

 
RandMan
Senior Member
Avatar
403 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
     
Mar 13, 2013 15:40 |  #1

Hi There,

I don't do a ton of printing, but whenever I do I seem to have the same problem happen every time--no matter if I print at home and send the file out to a professional.

Whether I'm starting with a blank canvas for a composite project, or just working on a photo to get it ready for print, I will establish my dimensions. Let's say for either example I have the full image/canvas size set to 8x10.

I then set it to print on 8x10 paper, borderless, and the preview on the screen in Photoshop looks just fine (I'm using CS6 btw). Then when I print, a small amount is cropped off without any warning! I printed a composite last week at Costco (8x10) and I had a thin colored border around the whole image. The entire top of the picture with the border ended up being cut off (I created the border by added an inside stroke).

Why does this happen and how do I control it? Shouldn't a document set in the computer to 8x10 fill an 8x10 piece of paper exactly, without shrinking or expanding (or cropping for that matter)???


Canon eos7D | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Canon 17-55mm 2.8 | Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 | Yongnuo 565ex | Yongnuo yn-468 II | Canon ef28-135mm 3.5/5.6 | Canon ef-s 55-250mm 4.0/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 13, 2013 15:43 |  #2

If it's not much, I would say it's just a matter of imprecision on the part of the cutting process. Prints aren't always exact right down to the millimeter.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 13, 2013 16:14 |  #3

Costco itself advises you to make your image dimensions a bit "bigger" than your desired full-bleed print to allow for a bit of "bleed-out". I don't have the card with their specific recommendations on-hand but I'm sure you could see them on their web site.

So, it makes sense to follow those recommendations with your home printing as well. I'd say experiment with this, test it out, and determine a good size in pixels for your full-bleed printing!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
403 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
     
Mar 13, 2013 16:17 |  #4

cdifoto wrote in post #15711522 (external link)
If it's not much, I would say it's just a matter of imprecision on the part of the cutting process. Prints aren't always exact right down to the millimeter.

But if I'm printing a 4x6 image on a 4x6 piece of photo paper, then there is nothing to cut!


Canon eos7D | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Canon 17-55mm 2.8 | Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 | Yongnuo 565ex | Yongnuo yn-468 II | Canon ef28-135mm 3.5/5.6 | Canon ef-s 55-250mm 4.0/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
403 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
     
Mar 13, 2013 16:19 |  #5

tonylong wrote in post #15711628 (external link)
Costco itself advises you to make your image dimensions a bit "bigger" than your desired full-bleed print to allow for a bit of "bleed-out". I don't have the card with their specific recommendations on-hand but I'm sure you could see them on their web site.

So, it makes sense to follow those recommendations with your home printing as well. I'd say experiment with this, test it out, and determine a good size in pixels for your full-bleed printing!

Hmmmm. I understand everything you said, but I don't like it (the concept of it, not anything to do with you). Seems like quite an unnecessary frustration.


Canon eos7D | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Canon 17-55mm 2.8 | Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 | Yongnuo 565ex | Yongnuo yn-468 II | Canon ef28-135mm 3.5/5.6 | Canon ef-s 55-250mm 4.0/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 13, 2013 16:28 |  #6

Ah, well, it's "The Nature of the Beast"!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Mar 13, 2013 17:22 |  #7

For your home, inkjet printer there is usually a bleed or expansion control to tweak the full bleed (borderless) print - it is usually something in the printer dialog (software). In that case, you are feeding the printer a cut sheet paper with a specific dimension to whatever precision you think is necessary - you buy the paper in bulk (i.e., 4x6 in paper that is precut maybe too inaccurate for you?) or you buy lager sheets and pre-cut it to exact size. Somehow I have a hard time imagining that your pre-cut 4x6 is not precise enough.

For labs, they use roll paper, and cut it. You have to allow for the cutting process. Consult the printer that you send your work to for the margin - it can be up to 1/8 in.

If neither of these things work for you, you can loosen your crop, especially if you are going to mat and frame. If your crop really needs less than 1/8 in all around, you need to print yourself and carefully control your border, or, better yet, print your 4x6, for example, on larger paper and trim it manually yourself to include whatever area you want. That way you are not trying to print borderless and being disappointed with that small amount of trim. You can also send print jobs to a lab this way, just make your document size larger than the image size and trim manually instead of trying to get a perfect full bleed job.

It sounds like you may not have an appreciation for what you are trying to get your printer to do. Think about what it takes to accurately print at the edge of a piece of paper - it is not a simple task. What printer are you using? Unless you are using a professional grade inkjet printer, you should consider lowering your expectations slightly to align them with the capabilities of the printer.

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 13, 2013 17:23 |  #8

RandMan wrote in post #15711638 (external link)
But if I'm printing a 4x6 image on a 4x6 piece of photo paper, then there is nothing to cut!

Well, not for you to cut.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 13, 2013 17:44 |  #9

It's been a while since I have done my own full-bleed printing -- I ended up with piles of 4x6 and 5x7 prints just laying around collecting dust. When I've wanted something like that I just have a shop do a quick job.

But sure, you have to allow for a bit of "trimming"...

For my personal printing I've just gone to printing on paper that is bigger than my planned print size, and I have an "industrial strength" paper cutter that allows me to cut various print sizes (the printer handles 13x19 paper). For 5x7s, I just put together two to be printed on 8.5x11 paper (as well as 8x10 prints).


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,119 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Mar 14, 2013 04:57 |  #10

When you select to print full bleed on your home inkjet printer it actually increases the size of the image slightly to allow for both slight inaccuracy in the paper size, and for the possible error in placing the paper in the printer itself. Commercial printers do the same thing for the same reason, it stops you getting white strips along edges. I know that in my Canon MG5150 printer driver you can adjust the amount of expansion, I always have it set to minimum, and yes occasionally there is a very narrow strip on the paper. I sometimes print 10"×8" on A4 paper, and when trimming notice that the image is not always quite square on the paper, I print trim lines and they are not parallel with the paper when using a paper trimmer.

The only option that I can think of off hand for a lab that will give you an image "full bleed" to the exact dimensions of the image is Whitewall (external link), who are based in Germany, but ship world wide. They print everything at custom sizes, and actually allow a white border on the paper that is extra to the specified print size. This would allow you to order a 16"×12" print that would be exactly that size but with 1" extra paper all round. Because of this you can actually have any aspect ratio print made up to the maximum size which IIRC is about 72"×120".

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,740 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Paper vs. Photoshop Paper Dimensions
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1139 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.