Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 20 Mar 2013 (Wednesday) 16:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What went wrong

 
Northwoods ­ Bill
Goldmember
1,145 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 413
Joined Jun 2012
     
Mar 20, 2013 16:01 |  #1

I was asked to take a picture today of a vintage snow machine give away. I went through all my settings and I should have been good

5DIII with 24-105 Lens
50mm Focal Distance
1/160 Sec
F/9.0

Single focal point on the guy with the green on his jacket

I just don't feel the shot is nearly as crisp as it could be. I know the bg is cluttered but they wanted the business name in the photo.

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8389/8574949039_fc090a1193_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …thwoods_photo/8​574949039/  (external link)

Bill R
Web:https://www.flickr.com​/photos/whitebirch/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrbubbles
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: NJ, USA
     
Mar 20, 2013 16:06 |  #2

The lighting is a bit flat which wont help with detail but other than that I think it is acceptably sharp for the lighting and distance from the group.

How was this processed? Faces look a tad soft due to noise reduction maybe? You could run through Photoshop to sharpen the photo.


Gear List
Zenfolio (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Cream of the Crop
5,013 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Feb 2011
     
Mar 20, 2013 16:06 |  #3

Seems okay to me for what it is...add some sharpening and call it good. Not like it's going to be a stellar shot anyway.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Northwoods ­ Bill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,145 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 413
Joined Jun 2012
     
Mar 20, 2013 16:12 |  #4

At work right now so I have LR but no Photoshop. As shot was a little over exposed so exposure and highlights both pulled down in LR. Also a bit of NR which kind of surprised me at that low an ISO I expected better from the 5DIII. Will apply sharpening in Photoshop tonight.

Shot on manual, did a couple of test shots and was happy. Was just finishing the actual shots when I realized the sun had gotten to a thinner section of cloud and I was over exposed. :oops:

Probably over thinking the image, I am really bad about nit-picking when it comes to my work.


Bill R
Web:https://www.flickr.com​/photos/whitebirch/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Mar 20, 2013 16:55 |  #5

Focus looks fine to me (at this size). Edited exposure looks decent as well. The weakest elements were the 1) posing 2) your ability to get all of the subjects to look in your direction.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mjkubba
Senior Member
Avatar
270 posts
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Chicagoland
     
Mar 20, 2013 17:06 |  #6

looks good to me you just need some processing to do, I don't have PS I use gimp since I'm not a professional and don't want to spend $$$ on it, Yes i know I'm CHEAP :P


Canon AE-1, Canon 60D, Fujifilm JX400
Canon 35-70mm, Canon 18-55mm IS, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 70-300 VC
http://folding.extreme​overclocking.com …ge.php?un=mjkub​ba&t=37726 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Northwoods ­ Bill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,145 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 413
Joined Jun 2012
     
Mar 20, 2013 18:47 |  #7

Just completed editing on two images. They look pretty good now. Have to say that I still prefer sharpening in PS as compared to LR. Also have better eye contact in these then the original image (especially the second one).

For a little back round info on these shots: The local snow mobile club bought this machine and completely rebuilt it. Then the Ford dealership pictured above painted it. It was then raffled off, the older couple in the front won it. That machine is a 1970's vintage.

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8106/8576395942_55945da5c7_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …thwoods_photo/8​576395942/  (external link)

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8529/8575300049_d9a5b3501f_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …thwoods_photo/8​575300049/  (external link)

Bill R
Web:https://www.flickr.com​/photos/whitebirch/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandytrouble
Member
104 posts
Joined Feb 2011
     
Mar 20, 2013 20:43 |  #8

the cropping seems more easy on the eyes, but you've lost the store name. Picture is sharp.


7D [EFS 17-55, EF 50 1.4, 70-200 IS II]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Corbeau
Senior Member
Avatar
377 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Great White North
     
Mar 20, 2013 20:55 |  #9

I would have placed the lucky winners on the seat of the skidoo, it would have dropped the row of standing people by two.


Look and think before opening the shutter. The heart and mind are the true lens of the camera. -- Yousuf Karsh

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Johnsen
Member
86 posts
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Guyana, South America
     
Mar 20, 2013 22:42 |  #10

Those type of group shots are really hard to do nicely. Does the finished size have to be a specific size? Im wondering if you can crop out the whole right side, from close to the kids shoulder leaning against the pillar. and basically do the same thing on the left. that would hide the distracting elements from the sides at least and bring more attention to the people, snomobile, and sign.


Stephan is my name. And no, its not pronounced "Step-Han"
De-Gripped 60d | Tamron 17-50 f2.8 non-vc | Canon 50mm 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS kit lens | Zeiss Distagon 35/2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,064 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
What went wrong
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1360 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.