Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 24 Mar 2013 (Sunday) 19:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

If Jupiter was the same distance as the Moon

 
neimad19
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Mar 24, 2013 19:51 |  #1

Not sure how accurate the size is but it's still pretty impressive.

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/UAJwFcU.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joe ­ Ravenstein
Goldmember
2,338 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: E Tx
     
Mar 24, 2013 19:58 |  #2

We'd be visiting Jupiter a whole lot more.


Canon 60D,18-55mm,55-250mm,50mm compact macro, AF ext tubes. Sigma 8-16mm uwa, 18-250mm, 85mm F1.4, 150-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Mar 24, 2013 20:57 |  #3

We would be worrying about one of Jupiters inner moons hitting our earth....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tarheeldragon
Senior Member
Avatar
622 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Aug 2010
Location: North Carolina
     
Mar 24, 2013 21:08 as a reply to  @ Celestron's post |  #4

We'd most likely freeze our patooties off when the Earth transited around the back side of Jupiter....or am I spoiling the fantasy? :p


Heros don't wear capes, they wear dog-tags!
Canon 60D, Canon 18-135 EFS, 10-22 EFS, 55-250 EFS and EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L Lenses, Kenko 2.0X PRO 300 Teleconverter DGX.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darthrazz
Member
Avatar
108 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 58
Joined May 2011
     
Mar 24, 2013 21:33 as a reply to  @ tarheeldragon's post |  #5

That would be amazing! We'd be smack in the middle of all the radiation it gives off, not sure we'd be around too long! :)


Canon 1DX MKII • Canon 7D MKII Gripped • Canon 50mm 1.2L • Canon 24-70mm 2.8L • Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM • Canon EF-S 24mm • Canon Speedlite 430ex •

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samsen
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,468 posts
Likes: 239
Joined Apr 2006
Location: LA
     
Mar 24, 2013 21:52 |  #6

In first place I would think if the assumption was real, earth would be part of Jupiter due to gravitational force by now.

But more importantly, where did you steal that Jupiter from???


Weak retaliates,
Strong Forgives,
Intelligent Ignores!
Samsen
Picture editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TC_Fenua
Senior Member
682 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Tahiti - French Polynésia
     
Mar 25, 2013 00:59 |  #7

I would say Cassini–Huygens probe survey :)


Teva , my Flickr (external link)
MataReva Photography (external link)
I suck at photography , but at least I'm having fun doing it :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrbubbles
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: NJ, USA
     
Mar 25, 2013 10:33 |  #8

Unfortunately if Jupters core was centered where the Moons core is(same distance) then Earth would be engulfed by Jupiter. So technically not that accurate. Either way though a sky like that would be amazing. I've always thought...what if our solar system happened to be on an edge of the galaxy so that we were looking down on it. The night sky would be amazing!


Gear List
Zenfolio (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Toxic ­ Coolaid
Goldmember
Avatar
1,115 posts
Likes: 328
Joined Feb 2011
Location: NorthEast Tennessee
     
Mar 25, 2013 12:54 |  #9

mrbubbles wrote in post #15753233 (external link)
what if our solar system happened to be on an edge of the galaxy so that we were looking down on it.

We are aren't we. Except we look up...which is technically in in the summer and out in the winter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Mar 25, 2013 13:22 |  #10

mrbubbles wrote in post #15753233 (external link)
Unfortunately if Jupters core was centered where the Moons core is(same distance) then Earth would be engulfed by Jupiter. So technically not that accurate.

No it wouldn't. Jupiter is big, but not that big. You may be thinking of the Sun.
The picture as shown, isn't far off the mark and looks cool.


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
awesomeshots
Goldmember
1,220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 158
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Los Angeles
     
Mar 25, 2013 13:28 |  #11

Lol at all the scientists wanna be posts. C'mon people enjoy the picture for what it is. Who cares what jupiter's gravitational pull is and the other bs. :p


Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 6D, Canon 24-70 F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/4L IS, 135mm 2.0 L, 85mm 1.8, Speedlite 430 II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
solepatch
Goldmember
Avatar
1,202 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 125
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Lexington Ky
     
Mar 25, 2013 13:29 |  #12

We would have some insane tides. Awesome job though.


Aaron
Canon 6D | 70D | Σ35 F/1.4A | Tamron 24-70 F/2.8 Di VC USD | 40 F/2.8 | 85 F/1.8 | 70-210 F/3.5-4.5 | Rokinon 14 F/2.8 | 430ex ii | YN-622C | Zoom H4N
Canon EOS M | 22 F/2 Pancake | C/Y Zeiss 50 F/1.4 t*

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bryanlee1981
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
     
Mar 25, 2013 13:47 |  #13

Assuming we are measuring distance from earth at the center point of both the moon and Jupiter...

The moon has a radius of 1079 miles. It is on average 238,857 miles from earth.

Jupiter has a radius of 43,441 miles. If it were placed in the same position as the average position of the moon there would be 196,495 miles from the outer edge of jupiter to the the outer edge of earth. While this is significantly closer, there would still be a gap. The radiation, effects of gravity and one of it's 67 moons slamming into us would be the real concern.


EOS Rebel T3i

18-55 mm IS type II f/3.5-5.6
75-300 EF-S III f/4-5.6
55-250 mm f/4-5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neimad19
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Mar 25, 2013 14:33 |  #14

I'm glad everyone likes the image :) However its not mine, the credit has to go to a Reddit user under the name jb2386.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrbubbles
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: NJ, USA
     
Mar 25, 2013 15:24 |  #15

bryanlee1981 wrote in post #15753962 (external link)
Assuming we are measuring distance from earth at the center point of both the moon and Jupiter...

The moon has a radius of 1079 miles. It is on average 238,857 miles from earth.

Jupiter has a radius of 43,441 miles. If it were placed in the same position as the average position of the moon there would be 196,495 miles from the outer edge of jupiter to the the outer edge of earth. While this is significantly closer, there would still be a gap. The radiation, effects of gravity and one of it's 67 moons slamming into us would be the real concern.

Thank you for this! I was too lazy to look at the numbers myself.


Gear List
Zenfolio (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,788 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
If Jupiter was the same distance as the Moon
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1093 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.