1Tanker Goldmember  4,470 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction More info | Dec 30, 2013 13:20 | #91 jefzor wrote in post #16562302  If I had a penny for every time this lens was predicted... ..you'd be 1/5 as rich as Watt100.. 6 posts above you. watt100 wrote: if I had a nickel for every rumored new 100-400 .... Kel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 01, 2014 14:51 | #92 1Tanker wrote in post #16564473 ..you'd be 1/5 as rich as Watt100.. 6 posts above you. I'm sorry, I was too lazy to read other posts.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EtherealZee Senior Member  364 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Sydney, Aus More info | Jan 02, 2014 04:59 | #93 I'll take $1000 per rumour, thanks. I want to be properly rich.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amoergosum Goldmember 1,016 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Germany More info | 2014 will see the replacement of the Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS, and we should see some new new patents showing new optical formulas for its replacement. Below is a patent for an EF 70-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS. Source:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2014 06:00 | #96 Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jrbdmb Goldmember  1,291 posts Likes: 12 Joined May 2011 More info | Feb 04, 2014 08:57 | #97 hollis_f wrote in post #16662240 Or maybe not. Canon Rumors have been posting this guff for over 5 years .Well you have to admit that eventually they will be right. Tools: 70D, 10-22, Tamron 24-70 VC, 70-300L, 135 f2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HuskyKMA "Now what?"  1,749 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Castle Rock, WA More info | Feb 04, 2014 19:34 | #98 A 70-400mm would be an interesting companion to the 24-70mm and alternative to the 70-200mm lineup for those who just want one longer lens. Canon 40D w/ BG-E2N Grip| 400mm f/5.6L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 | Gitzo GT3541LS w/ RRS BH-55
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smythie I wasn't even trying More info | Feb 04, 2014 20:13 | #99 And a pretty direct competitor to the Nikon 80-400, though you're getting close to a 6:1 zoom ratio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid  More info | Feb 05, 2014 19:55 | #101 oxxygen wrote in post #16666731 & direct competitor to 70-300L too..?? the 70-300L will look like a cheap alternative when this thing comes in at double the price for an extra 100mm... Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vengence Goldmember 2,103 posts Likes: 108 Joined Mar 2013 More info | Feb 07, 2014 12:24 | #103 DreDaze wrote in post #16666754 the 70-300L will look like a cheap alternative when this thing comes in at double the price for an extra 100mm...  70-400mm seems strange to me though...but i'm not putting too much stock in the latest rumor...it's probably just like all the others... The 70-300L is a seriously under appreciated lens. Though whenever canon does decide to replace the 100-400L, if they give the mark II two similar IQ and IS to the 70-300L, they'll have a real winner on their hands, even if they do charge 2000$ for it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomReichner "That's what I do."  17,636 posts Gallery: 213 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8384 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot More info | Feb 09, 2014 11:36 | #104 DreDaze wrote in post #16666754 70-400mm seems strange to me though...but i'm not putting too much stock in the latest rumor...it's probably just like all the others... But Sony has a 70-400mm, and based on all the reviews I have read it is a stellar performer. The ability to go from 70mm to 400mm with the same lens has made me consider buying a Sony body and that 70-400mm lens. Nothing Canon has can match that range. "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Feb 09, 2014 12:13 | #105 Tom Reichner wrote in post #16676042 But Sony has a 70-400mm, and based on all the reviews I have read it is a stellar performer. The ability to go from 70mm to 400mm with the same lens has made me consider buying a Sony body and that 70-400mm lens. Nothing Canon has can match that range. ok...but wouldn't it be strange if sony updated that lens with a 100-400mm focal length...i think the strange part is to supposedly give an update to a 100-400mm lens, and then change the focal length Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is bzguy 1691 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
