Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 27 Mar 2013 (Wednesday) 13:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is that a dinosaur in your pocket, or...?

 
Madwrench
Senior Member
633 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Feb 2011
     
Mar 27, 2013 13:05 |  #1

Maybe this has already been discussed in this forum, but anyone wonder how long it will be until compact cameras are all but obsolete? Even this forum seems to be way down on posts from a year or so ago (I have no hard data on that and could be wrong!).

I own an S95 for times when I don't need to haul around a full size DSLR kit. It's a good little tool, but honestly, if I had a late-model iPhone or such, I doubt I would ever pick the S95 up. That would certainly be the case if a cellphone had raw capability. I keep seeing better and better images and video coming out of the new "phones".

I suppose this is somewhat similar to the "M4/3 cameras will kill the DSLR" stuff, but I think those two formats are still pretty far apart compared to iPhone vs. compact.

At any rate, I think when my S95 dies, I will just upgrade my phone instead of replacing it. Hell, I think I still have a Flip video cam sitting around somewhere :lol:.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Mar 27, 2013 13:44 |  #2

It's getting there. And honestly, for casual photography, phones can even be more powerful in that they have some pretty interesting apps available for photography as well as instant tagging and sharing.

For pure image quality, you aren't going to beat a compact with RAW and a better lens, but if image quality was priority #1, you'd be bringing the camera bag, right?


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
v35skyline
Goldmember
3,572 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Mar 27, 2013 13:48 |  #3

You think compact cameras are dinosaurs? I carry at least one film camera with me at all times - the oldest dating over 50 years of age. :p

Anyway, I own an iPhone 5. It's better than nothing, since the "best camera is the camera you have with you." But if I know I am going to take pictures (as opposed to unanticipated pictures, for which my iPhone will suffice) and don't want to take my 5D2 or some analog kit, then I will bring the S100.

My iPhone 5's IQ is certainly better than any previous phone I've had, and I don't doubt cameras in phones will continue to progress. But until they can meet or exceed the dynamic range of a quality P&S...


X100s | X-Pro1 | X-T1 | XF 14 | XF 18 | XF 35 | XF 56 | XF 60 | XF 10-24
Gear List & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madwrench
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
633 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Feb 2011
     
Mar 27, 2013 14:30 as a reply to  @ v35skyline's post |  #4

I'm not ready to give up a dedicated tool yet, either, but there may well be a significant jump in IQ (or would that be iQ:D) coming, and as it is I only use my compact for casual/social stuff where content far outweighs IQ (I still much prefer raw, though). Of course, even if "phone" IQ gets really, really good, someone will still get rich screwing it up a la instagram. On the other hand, I have some friends who never carried or seemed to have much use for a camera, but now take photos with their phones - and a few of them are pretty damn talented!

There was an article in the Wisconsin State Journal (LINK) (external link) last week about a local photographer (20 years as a newspaper photog, and another 6 on his own) who bought an iPhone, which altered his perspective in several ways.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EowynCarter
Member
33 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Mar 29, 2013 05:10 as a reply to  @ Madwrench's post |  #5

I was surprised at the quality of some photo a friend took with her phone.
But then, no phone overmatch my S100 :)
My own phone is close to useless in "low" light. I guess I'm also spoiled by the S100 quality.

Maybe low end compact will go, high end might stay for people who care about IQ but don't fell like carrying a reflex.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rich ­ Road
Member
184 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Los Angeles
     
Mar 29, 2013 11:11 |  #6

cheap compact cameras might go away,
but high-end compacts with DSLR-like IQ are here to stay




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eccentric ­ M
Senior Member
349 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
Apr 01, 2013 11:40 |  #7

I'll only replace my S110 with a camera phone when there are decent camera phones that can shoot raw and have at least 3x optical zoom...


EOS 7D - EF-S 15-85 IS USM - EF 50 1.8 II - EF 70-300 IS USM - Speedlite 430EX II
A6000 - 16-50 PZ OSS
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FinancialWar
Mostly Lurking
17 posts
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Australia
     
Apr 09, 2013 05:14 as a reply to  @ Eccentric M's post |  #8

there is always going to be people who can't afford a smartphone and would like to take pictures, so cheap compact still have their place in the market.


Nikon D700 (sold), 50mm 1.4G
Canon S95
Nikon for DSLR, Canon for compact

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EowynCarter
Member
33 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Apr 09, 2013 05:27 |  #9

FinancialWar wrote in post #15806887 (external link)
there is always going to be people who can't afford a smartphone and would like to take pictures, so cheap compact still have their place in the market.

That's an interesting point.

Some people might need something to take descent photos without the need for a smartphone, or wanting to spend the $$$ in a smartphone that does the job good enough.
And there is still the space that optical zoom takes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pbelarge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Westchester County, NY
     
Apr 09, 2013 05:29 as a reply to  @ FinancialWar's post |  #10

I am stuck with the mindset of using my phone as a phone/texting, that is pretty much it. Once in a blue moon I actually go online with it - I am thinking of ditching my online plan.


I carry my s95 with me pretty much everywhere - either in my cargo pocket or car, yet it gets just a little usage. I hate shutter lag.
Because I also carry my 5D3/HF-M500 video cam everywhere with me in my shoulder bag with at least 2 other lenses and "other stuff".

People think I am nuts, but once you do something for more than 30 days, it generally becomes a habit. I also have 2 tripods in my car at all times.
I like to think it keeps me out of the gym.
It also tends to make me late for dinner a lot too. :)


just a few of my thoughts...
Pierre

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barn9
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Land of OZ
     
Apr 09, 2013 08:59 |  #11

I like the way you think pbelarge, LOL!


_______________
Canon EOS Rebel T3i 600D
Canon EOS M
Canon S95, Canon SX30is
Canon S5is, Canon A2000is

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
60D ­ Street
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Apr 2013
     
Apr 11, 2013 14:41 |  #12

I can honestly say that I don't think the phone will replace the camera, at least not for me. I almost always have either of my current compacts or my 4/3 with me if I don't have my camera bag. I've used my phone for photos, absolutely, but that's usually in a pinch. I just get far clearer, punchier and useable pictures off of my real cameras. I can't give that up.


Canon 60D, Rebel G - EF 28-135 USM f/3.5-5.6, EF 35-105 F4-5.6, EF 50mm F/1.8 II, EF 40mm STM f/2.8, Sigma 28-80 F/3.5-5.6 II Macro, Vivitar 2XMC4 AF
Olympus Pen E-PL1 - Sigma 19mm EX DN F/2.8
Canon S100, Panasonic ZS-19k

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,663 posts
Gallery: 150 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1258
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
Apr 25, 2013 20:33 as a reply to  @ 60D Street's post |  #13

When and if my A720IS kicks the bucket, I'll decide then what makes the most sense. I can't imagine that an iPhone will offer the type of flexibility that I have with this little Powershot. It has an optical viewfinder, full manual operation, ISO up to 1600, flash EC, surprisingly good macro. I have the underwater housing for it which allowed me to shoot while scuba diving on a 2 week trip to the Philippines without the stress of worrying about flooding and destroying a couple thousand dollars worth of DSLR gear. It is my first choice for beach parties here where I live now.

It will never rival my 60D, but I don't hesitate to grab it when the DSLR is just much.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vertical
Member
32 posts
Joined Mar 2012
     
Apr 26, 2013 13:39 |  #14

A few things would need to happen to make this happen, IMO:

1) MUCH better battery life from phones. As it is now, the way I use my phone, the battery is constantly draining. If I then also used it to record videos and take dozens of photos, it would really hamper my ability to use it for other things.

2) Optical zoom on a phone. Maybe it's just me, but I honestly can't stand not having any optical zoom. Sure, my phone camera suffices for 'snapshots' to post on facebook or whatever, but if I want creative or anything better than a 'snapshot', I like having the creative flexibility that optical zoom gives me.

3) Storage solutions - This one is pretty much already solved now with cloud-based storage, but a complaint I heard a lot from a friend who uses his iPhone as his camera is that he had to stop taking pictures because he was out of space. I know most non-Apple phones have microSD slots to solve that problem, but there are a lot of iPhone users who have no such solution.

Until and unless all of these are solved, I honestly wouldn't ever think of leaving my P&S camera behind and relying completely on my phone camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madwrench
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
633 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Feb 2011
     
Sep 12, 2013 07:44 as a reply to  @ Vertical's post |  #15

Getting closer, I think.

The images I've seen from the Nokia Lumia 1020 are impressive. If it had raw capability my old S95 would be sitting on a shelf instead of in my pocket. I only use a compact for "emergencies" anyway, when I don't have a DSLR with me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,052 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Is that a dinosaur in your pocket, or...?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1349 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.