Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 15 Jan 2006 (Sunday) 01:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is there an easier way...

 
InskiP
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: La Quinta, CA
     
Jan 15, 2006 01:11 |  #1

to convert a folder of images to 4x6 and 72ppi? It's for an online gallery. What I did was use Image Processor in CS2 where I selected the folder of images to process. I then select the file type, jpeg, and resize to fit 288x432, however, it doesn't allow me to change the resolution so I don't end up w/ a 4x6. I was hoping there was an easier way than to go into every single image and change it to 72ppi. I suppose I could make an action that can be used in image processor??


Canon 20D
50mm 1.8
85mm 1.8
580EX(still trying to figure it out)
Lightsphere II
PS CS2
Mac OSX
Apple Studio Display(LCD)
www.vip.smugmug.com (external link)
Critique and edits welcome
:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 15, 2006 03:59 |  #2

Why would it matter what ppi it says it is? So long as it has the right number of pixels it rarely makes a difference.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jan 15, 2006 05:26 |  #3

The ppi (or dpi) tag has relevence only for printing. With an on-line gallery the size of the image as seen on a monitor is determined by the ppi of the monitor and the pixel size of the image. In the past, when monitor resolution was fixed, the standard for monitors was indeed 72 ppi, but today, since it is easily user changed, most people have their monitors set somewhere between 90 - 110. Since you can't know exactly what an individual viewer's screen will show, the best you can do is choose a size that will work well for most people, like 400x600 or 500x750. This is why most photo hosting sites will give viewers a choice of sizes at which they can see the image.
Elie


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jan 15, 2006 06:54 |  #4

These two images are both 300 x 300 pixels.
One is saved at 1PPI.
The other is saved at 999PPI.
Can you tell the difference?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
InskiP
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: La Quinta, CA
     
Jan 15, 2006 12:30 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #5

Curtis N wrote:
These two images are both 300 x 300 pixels.
One is saved at 1PPI.
The other is saved at 999PPI.
Can you tell the difference?

The one on the left is a tad softer, but really not much difference.

tim wrote:
Why would it matter what ppi it says it is? So long as it has the right number of pixels it rarely makes a difference.

Because I want to keep it a low resolution (72) and a small file size. When I use Image Processor, it keeps the resolution at 250, and a 4x6 at 250 end up w/ an 8MB file...to big for what I want to do. Maybe I'm missing something here???


Canon 20D
50mm 1.8
85mm 1.8
580EX(still trying to figure it out)
Lightsphere II
PS CS2
Mac OSX
Apple Studio Display(LCD)
www.vip.smugmug.com (external link)
Critique and edits welcome
:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jan 15, 2006 13:33 as a reply to  @ InskiP's post |  #6

InskiP wrote:
The one on the left is a tad softer, but really not much difference.

Those two images are identical, pixel-for-pixel. Even the file size is exactly the same. I posted them to make the point that PPI is meaningless when viewed on a monitor, and nearly meaningless anywhere else.

To resize and save images for the web, resize it to the number of pixels you want (in this case it looks like you want 288 x 432). Then when you save as JPEG, select a compression that represents a reasonable compromise between file size and quality.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 16, 2006 00:59 as a reply to  @ InskiP's post |  #7

InskiP wrote:
Because I want to keep it a low resolution (72) and a small file size. When I use Image Processor, it keeps the resolution at 250, and a 4x6 at 250 end up w/ an 8MB file...to big for what I want to do. Maybe I'm missing something here???

I think you need to read the responses to this thread more carefully, the answers are all here, especially what Curtis said.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jan 16, 2006 04:56 |  #8

The point that Curtis made is that his two images are exactly the same size. The point I tried to make is that there is no way you can guarantee that everybody in the world will see your images at a certain size. On my monitor a 288x432 image appears 3.15x4.7 inches because my monitor is 90ppi.

"When I use Image Processor, it keeps the resolution at 250, and a 4x6 at 250 end up w/ an 8MB file...to big for what I want to do. Maybe I'm missing something here"

It's too big because 250 x (4x6) = 1000x1500 pixels. Forget ppi resolution. File size is determined by the number of pixels and jpg compression. I'd suggest 400x600 and medium compression.
Elie


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,528 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Is there an easier way...
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1653 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.