Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 04 Apr 2013 (Thursday) 12:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

PC or Mac Mini

 
mpix345
Goldmember
2,870 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Dec 2006
     
Apr 04, 2013 12:28 |  #1

My PC just died, well, the PS and HD died. My local tech guy highly recommends building around what is left of it, which will cost me $800 or so. I'm also looking at brand new units, either off the shelf or customized. So confused. ??? SSD? Do I really need 16GB of RAM? Should I upgrade my old video card for $250? I just can't discern what matters the most for my needs, and I really can't get a clear view on it despite spending many hours on various web sites.

I'd like a general purpose machine that will not bog down running LR or editing HD video. Not talking hours and hours of work, maybe 30 minutes of video a week, and usually a light load of pics in LR. I'm not a pro; just for fun stuff.

I'd really like to just spend $1000 on a Mac Mini and be done with it. But I'm wondering if that is a stupid move?

something like this: Apple Apple Mac mini quad-core Intel Core i7 2.3GHz, 4GB RAM, 1TB Fusion Drive, Intel HD Graphics 4000, OS X Mountain Lion (Z0NP-23GHZ4GB1TBFD)

Or, for $1240: Apple Apple Mac mini quad-core Intel Core i7 2.6GHz, 8GB RAM, 1TB Fusion Drive, Intel HD Graphics 4000, OS X Mountain Lion.

I would really appreciate the simplicity of the Mini. But if I am only getting a fraction of the performance for similar dollars then I suppose I'll keep banging my head against the wall, err, I mean stick with a PC.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. If you care to recommend an off-the-shelf PC that would be welcome as well.

Thanks!


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icacphotography
Senior Member
613 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Niagara Region Canada
     
Apr 04, 2013 12:53 |  #2

If your PS and HD died in your PC the big question is how old is it? Reason I say that is if it's an older machine throwing $800 into it may not make sense.

On the SSD point they make a huge difference in speed when loading RAW files or editing HD video etc as the write/read speeds are through the roof. Do you need 16GB of RAM? the answer to that lies in how much multitasking you do. If you're going to be batch processing a bunch of photos at once and editing an HD video at the same time RAM and the SSD would certainly help.

With that said honestly for the $1000 I'd stick with PC. You're getting a huge step down if you go with a mac mini and the other issue is the config you buy is essentially what you're stuck with. Upgrading Mac minis is a huge PITA.


Body:50D gripped Magic Lantern'd
Lenses:50mm 1.8,40mm 2.8,28-105 USM II,70-210 F4, 1962 Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 55mm 1.8
Flash: Canon 430 EX
The camera is just a tool - it is not responsible for the picture.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpix345
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,870 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Dec 2006
     
Apr 04, 2013 13:41 |  #3

Thanks for the quick reply.

I bought the PC used. It is 2+ years old.

Specs:
- MSI P55-CD53 motherboard
- Intel Core i7 860 running at 2.80Ghz (using the factory heat sink)
- 4gb Corsair RAM DDR3
- 500w Cool Master PSU
- GeForce 7800gt OC

I don't do much multi-tasking, unless you count wasting time on POTN while something is processing. :)

I definitely get what you are saying about the Mini. But if it got me through 4 years (or even 3) it would probably be worth it.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,097 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 442
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Apr 04, 2013 16:02 |  #4

What software do you use to edit video?

If your using Premier Pro, and will continue to use it, then forget about the Mini.
If your happy to switch to Final Cut Pro X and can also afford a thunderbolt drive for external storage then the Mini will be fine.


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
Apr 05, 2013 04:05 |  #5

I just purchased a Mac Mini i7 2.3 to replace an aging Core2Quad Hackintosh.

I'd personally get the mini, pull the drives out of the old machine, and stick them in enclosures so you can access the files. The mini is a pretty zippy little machine and made a bit faster with ram (16gb for $120 or less) and if you're adventurous a SSD drive.

I'm using Final Cut Pro X and it ran okay with the 4 gigs of ram and was much better with 16 gigs when rendering in the background. Lightroom is much better than my old machine but honestly I find LR just a bit slow in general no matter what the machine. Photoshop CS6 runs okay on 4 gigs of ram as well.


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 05, 2013 05:02 |  #6

Mac mini: simple, reliable.

PC: probably cheaper, probably faster. i5, built in graphics or a low end video card, 16GB RAM for video I think, good quality PSU and case. A good PSU will last a few builds.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Apr 05, 2013 21:18 |  #7

mpix345 wrote in post #15790387 (external link)
Or, for $1240: Apple Apple Mac mini quad-core Intel Core i7 2.6GHz, 8GB RAM, 1TB Fusion Drive, Intel HD Graphics 4000, OS X Mountain Lion.

This is what I did, except I bought it with the base 4 gb of RAM and the 1 TB hard drive. I then installed a 240 GB SSD in the second bay and initialized it and the 1 TB hard drive as a 1.24 TB Fusion drive and put 16 GB of RAM in. Total cost was about $1100. If I were to do it again, I'd go with a 256 GB Samsung 840 SSD Pro series.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrisa
Goldmember
1,178 posts
Gallery: 184 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2266
Joined May 2005
Location: Effingham, IL
     
Apr 06, 2013 17:45 |  #8

The mini is a pretty zippy little machine and made a bit faster with ram (16gb for $120 or less)

ram doesn't make a computer faster.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 06, 2013 17:57 |  #9

chrisa wrote in post #15798061 (external link)
ram doesn't make a computer faster.

Extra RAM can make a computer faster if you're doing things that make it run out of memory and swap things to disk. It also means things are cached in memory, rather than retrieved from disk.

So if you have enough RAM it won't make it faster to add more, moving from say 4GB to 16GB will definitely make a computer feel faster.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
22,958 posts
Gallery: 457 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 15536
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU
     
Apr 06, 2013 18:00 |  #10

chrisa wrote in post #15798061 (external link)
ram doesn't make a computer faster.

Maybe not in terms of per application performance, no. But if you have multiple applications open RAM makes a huge difference. My 8-core Mac Pro came with 6 GB of RAM and if I had Lightroom and PS open it would be kinda slow to make other open applications active. Now I have 24 GB in there and everything opens immediately without delays. The whole thing flies now.


Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19371752
Please QUOTE the comment to which you are responding!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrisa
Goldmember
1,178 posts
Gallery: 184 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2266
Joined May 2005
Location: Effingham, IL
     
Apr 06, 2013 18:09 |  #11

But if you have multiple applications open RAM makes a huge difference.

Exactly, the ram stops it from slowing down. That's not the same as making it faster.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,097 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 442
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Apr 06, 2013 18:26 |  #12

chrisa wrote in post #15798103 (external link)
Exactly, the ram stops it from slowing down. That's not the same as making it faster.

Don't confuse clock speed and mhz with how fast a computer is.
It's a much more complex system than that, and it will only ever be as fast as the next bottle neck, which can vary depending on what your asking it to do.


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
Apr 07, 2013 17:12 |  #13

For $1000 - 1200 you could put together a decent PC that will kick the mac mini around for fun.

Home build and overclock - you will be amazed at what you can achieve with that budget - you should be able to get the i7 860 that you have to run at 3.8Ghz


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Apr 08, 2013 10:54 |  #14

If you only need really casual use, then the Mac Mini is a fine little rig. However there are limits, obviously. You are limited in how many drives you can easily attach, and what style of drives you can use. No optical drive bays and the like to securely mount useful things like CF card readers or dvd burners.

They are much harder to work inside those cramped cases for things like swapping out drives or upgrading ram.

The mini we have in my office is by far the least reliable system and most prone to "spinning beachball of doom" issues. (Seriously, I've locked the thing up for a good half hour trying to launch pico in a terminal...) it is a model 5.1, and the older iMacs and Macbooks we have run circles around it for the most part.


If you are technical and are able to work with computers (Really not that hard, and I've seen Lego kits that were more complex to put together than a modern PC.) then I would suggest rebuilding your PC. You will get far more bang per buck by putting something together yourself than a mac mini could ever hope to offer. It will however mean more work for you, take up more space on your desk, etc.


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Apr 08, 2013 12:08 |  #15

Luckless wrote in post #15803495 (external link)
If you only need really casual use, then the Mac Mini is a fine little rig. However there are limits, obviously.

But for photo work it's perfectly fine, especially with Aperture and Pixelmator.

You are limited in how many drives you can easily attach, and what style of drives you can use.

I don't understand this. I have two firewire drives connected to mine and it was very easy to do. Just plug in the cable in daisy chain.

No optical drive bays and the like to securely mount useful things like CF card readers or dvd burners.

Can't tell you the last time I used a DVD or CD. I still use my USB CF adapter and it's just fine. Of course, the mini also has a built-in SD slot.

They are much harder to work inside those cramped cases for things like swapping out drives or upgrading ram.

I don't think they're harder, they just require more patience and a little more time. I installed an SSD in bay 2 of my 2012 Mini and it took all of 10 minutes to do.

The mini we have in my office is by far the least reliable system and most prone to "spinning beachball of doom" issues. (Seriously, I've locked the thing up for a good half hour trying to launch pico in a terminal...) it is a model 5.1, and the older iMacs and Macbooks we have run circles around it for the most part.

You have an issue of some kind. I've had Core Duo, Core 2 Duo, 2011 i5 and 2012 i7 models and only the Core Duo had this kind of issue and it was always related to insufficient RAM (2 gb limit). I suggest you add or replace your RAM sticks and do Disk Repair and verify that you don't have some USB hardware that is causing the problem.

If you are technical and are able to work with computers (Really not that hard, and I've seen Lego kits that were more complex to put together than a modern PC.) then I would suggest rebuilding your PC. You will get far more bang per buck by putting something together yourself than a mac mini could ever hope to offer. It will however mean more work for you, take up more space on your desk, etc.

I went from a 2.9 gHz Lynnfield i7 quad core with an ATI Radeon 5870/2GB vRAM with 3 internal drives, 8 gb of RAM and a DVD/Blu-Ray drive. The 2012 Mini with its Fusion drive scored better on GeekBench and it is completely silent. I now have that Lynnfield in my office at work and I hear the fans. Always. Very annoying.

The 2012 Mini is a superb computer for photo work. I have no interest in big, ugly, noisy, eyesore desktops ever again.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,436 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
PC or Mac Mini
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1391 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.