 | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
Sierra Nevada
by flikkeroman, on Flickr
romanneke Member 58 posts Joined Sep 2011 Location: The Netherlands More info | Apr 05, 2013 13:58 | #1
Sierra Nevada by flikkeroman, on FlickrCanon T2i (gripped), Canon 15-85mm, Sigma 30mm, Ef-s 18-55mm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ammdigital Member 109 posts Joined Feb 2012 Location: Far Northern California More info | Apr 05, 2013 14:15 | #3 chloeP wrote in post #15794290 Really nice....I would remove the crane(?) though as it kind of ruins the feel. +1. Canon 5D Mark III (gripped), EF 16-35mm 2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm 2.8L USM, EF 70-200 2.8 L IS II USM, EF 85mm 1.8 USM, 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 05, 2013 15:27 | #4 Ok, that's actualy not a bad idea.. Thanks. Canon T2i (gripped), Canon 15-85mm, Sigma 30mm, Ef-s 18-55mm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
callumbrae Senior Member  404 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2013 Location: Australia More info | Apr 05, 2013 16:12 | #5 The crane doesn't bother me. It is a well balanced composition and beautiful scene. There is a lot more detail in the white building than this version shows. If you have photoshop, use your shadow highlight control, wind the shadow sliders back to 0 and just work on the highlight sliders. If not and you have a RAW version, just pull the exposure back a bit. callumbrae
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Apr 05, 2013 16:22 | #6 I think the crane makes an interesting juxtaposition with the rest of the things in the frame, including the guy commuting via horseback... - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Apr 05, 2013 16:30 | #7 I think the exposure problem is more an issue than the crane but I think the man and donkey need to be exposed better not just the white buildings.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
UKseagull Senior Member  More info | Apr 05, 2013 16:34 | #8 Snydremark wrote in post #15794771 I think the crane makes an interesting juxtaposition with the rest of the things in the frame, including the guy commuting via horseback... I agree with this comment. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mdzukunft Member 53 posts Joined Mar 2013 Location: Chicago More info | Apr 06, 2013 11:14 | #9 Compositionally, what is the subject? You have a wide DOF but the foreground subject is underexposed while the background subject needs, as above, more detail. Either throw out focus in the foreground or do the opposite and light the man/donkey to darken the scene (for a more dramatic feel). And I agree on the crane. Either remove it or...find a better way re: juxtaposition of old/new. Right now, it is a distracting element.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ktan7 Goldmember 1,016 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2013 Location: Vancouver More info | May 10, 2013 14:50 | #10 Nice but I think there is too many things going on with the picture. It would be better if it was just the horse/man subject + mountains background. Crane, buildings, etc. too much of distraction. Vancouver wedding photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
howzitboy Goldmember 2,948 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Hawaii More info | May 11, 2013 01:08 | #11 nice picture but i keep looking at that mountain road thinking how fun it would be to drive down that thing!! http://onehourwedding.blogspot.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 703 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
