Nevermind. It is worth it. Lol.
Kronie Goldmember 2,183 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Apr 08, 2013 14:48 | #2 I would think the image quality would be paramount over the physical look of the lens. But hey, get the 85 you will look great shooting with....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2013 15:44 | #3 Kronie wrote in post #15804400 I would think the image quality would be paramount over the physical look of the lens. But hey, get the 85 you will look great shooting with.... Haha, I don't mean the look of the lens itself but its rendition when shooting at F/1.2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kolor-Pikker Goldmember 2,790 posts Likes: 59 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Moscow More info | Apr 08, 2013 16:12 | #4 Anything can be justified by anyone who wants something badly enough. For some people, dropping 2 grand on what some might consider a specialty lens is a ton of money, while for others it's merely a stepping stone. A medium format camera with a 150mm f/2.8 lens can replicate the look with no CA and sharp to the corners even wide open, but at a cost that makes the 85L seem like chump change, and yet there are still those who can justify something like that. 5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1163 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||