Just this morning, took delivery of my "new" refurb 24-105. Looks pristine, and both rings are very smooth. UA date code. Can't wait to try it out!
ickmcdon Senior Member 323 posts Joined Apr 2012 Location: North Dakota More info | Apr 12, 2013 20:30 | #1 Just this morning, took delivery of my "new" refurb 24-105. Looks pristine, and both rings are very smooth. UA date code. Can't wait to try it out!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
francis_a Member 238 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2012 Location: Derry, NH More info | Apr 12, 2013 20:40 | #2 Congrats, that's one fine lens. Enjoy! Lowepro Flipside Sport 15L AW | Crumpler 6MDH | Lumiquest Quik Bounce 80/20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JLai81 Senior Member 736 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Ponte Vedra, FL More info | Apr 12, 2013 22:35 | #3 |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 13, 2013 00:21 | #5 Try shooting at 105mm f4.5 and 1/10 shutter speed (brace yourself against something). UA date code 24-105's have a higher than normal chance of having a bad circuit board which will cause the IS system to create blur in your slow SS shots when the aperture is closed down past wide open. The blur will be quite consistent and diagonal, not all over the place as is normal with camera shake. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2013 10:27 | #6 @Sirrith: I'll give that a shot; hopefully, that was checked during the refurb process.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Adamrhh Junior Member 27 posts Joined Mar 2013 More info | Apr 13, 2013 23:42 | #8 Love that lens 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Alpinebully Member  117 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2011 Location: Melbourne Australia More info | Apr 14, 2013 01:04 | #9 Congratulations mate. The 24-105L lives on our camera 98% of time time and i couldnt be happier. ...............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 14, 2013 04:06 | #10 ickmcdon wrote in post #15823355  @Sirrith: I'll give that a shot; hopefully, that was checked during the refurb process. That was one of the main reasons I waited for a refurb, rather than buying new or used. Fingers crossed yours has been checked then -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
renlok Member 249 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Perth, Australia More info | Apr 14, 2013 07:08 | #11 |
Apr 16, 2013 21:25 | #12 @Sirrith: I tried your test. I took 2 shots at 1/10, 105mm, one at 4.0 and one at 5.0, handheld, IS on.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
L.J.G. "Not brigth enough"  More info | Apr 16, 2013 21:38 | #13 Congrats on the new lens! While it is not my favourite lens it is one I can never bring myself to sell because of its verstility and consistency. You will get plenty of use out of it and love it. Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 16, 2013 22:55 | #14 ickmcdon wrote in post #15836085 @Sirrith: I tried your test. I took 2 shots at 1/10, 105mm, one at 4.0 and one at 5.0, handheld, IS on. It passed with flying colors!! Great news! -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BearDale "I get 'em pregnant"  More info | Apr 17, 2013 00:49 | #15 L.J.G. wrote in post #15836128 Congrats on the new lens! While it is not my favourite lens it is one I can never bring myself to sell because of its verstility and consistency. You will get plenty of use out of it and love it. Me either Lloyd, so many times I've been tempted, but I know I never will. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 489 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
