Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
Thread started 15 Jan 2006 (Sunday) 17:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Union Pacific Power, New to Forum, looking for opinions.

 
Sleepe
Member
46 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Bluemont, Va
     
Jan 15, 2006 17:57 |  #1


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Took these shots in Iowa last November. I enjoy reading the comments on other peoples work so I would like to read some on my work. All shot were taken with 20d, 100- 400L USM IS and no tripod. Eventually the 6018 moved on first and beings it was on the eastbound track I am sure that it switched just west of this location in a small yard. The sun was setting at the time of these photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO DISPLAY FAILED: ATTACH id 50241 does not exist. ]



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Clark
Senior Member
Avatar
559 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Iowa
     
Jan 15, 2006 18:22 |  #2

Where in Iowa were you for these?


Um... Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sleepe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
46 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Bluemont, Va
     
Jan 15, 2006 18:40 |  #3

Just west of Ames. About halfway to Boone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jan 15, 2006 19:14 |  #4

I like the first one - it looks like they're closing in on you (though you could straighten it out just a bit).


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rckaine
Senior Member
Avatar
328 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Northville, Mi. USA
     
Jan 15, 2006 19:19 as a reply to  @ Tom W's post |  #5

I like the compostion of both shots. They seem a little dark for me though. Nice shots.

Kaine




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon ­ Foster
is it safe?
Avatar
4,521 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Feb 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
     
Jan 16, 2006 00:47 |  #6

Cool, I like them.

Jon.


I shoot with a Little Canon

Check out my photos @ PBase.com (external link) & ModelMayhem.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jan 16, 2006 06:50 |  #7

These look like they have the potential to be nice shots except they don't seem to be sharp? Are you sharpening after resizing?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harold_L
Goldmember
1,192 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
     
Jan 16, 2006 07:40 |  #8

I concur with the others - nice shots, just need a bit more "snap".


Harold
Canon Rebel XT w/ Tamron 28-75 mm F2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jan 16, 2006 08:04 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #9

PhotosGuy wrote:
These look like they have the potential to be nice shots except they don't seem to be sharp? Are you sharpening after resizing?

Could be the dreaded "resize for web" function, or he's got them uploaded on the web at a larger size, and they have been auto-reduced to the 800 pixel max by PBase or another hosting service. Also could be that since it was getting a bit dark, shutter speed was very low.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jan 16, 2006 08:09 |  #10

And you were planted right in front of these babies for the shot! You are braver than I am. ;)

Great captures. Loved the first one.

SuzyView


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sleepe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
46 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Bluemont, Va
     
Jan 16, 2006 17:39 |  #11

I thank-you for the comments so far, as far as sharpening or getting more snap how does one do that? Shutter was 1/100, f 9.0, iso 100, and as I said the sun was setting and I did not use a tripod. If I understand sharpening, it is not a tool that will correct an out of focus shot? Should I not depend on auto focus? With the settings on the camera I would'nt think I need a tripod.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jan 16, 2006 18:07 as a reply to  @ Sleepe's post |  #12

Sleepe wrote:
I thank-you for the comments so far, as far as sharpening or getting more snap how does one do that? Shutter was 1/100, f 9.0, iso 100, and as I said the sun was setting and I did not use a tripod. If I understand sharpening, it is not a tool that will correct an out of focus shot? Should I not depend on auto focus? With the settings on the camera I would'nt think I need a tripod.

1/100 is borderline, depending on focal length used and whether you used IS or not. If you bump up the ISO to 200 or 400, you can get significantly faster shutter speeds, which will eliminate any camera shake issues.

There's also the chance that you used the "save for web" feature of your processing software. It's better if you just resize and save at a higher quality level rather than using the automated feature, which usually saves as a lower-quality JPG.

Another thing which has caught me a couple of times is that I like to save my images larger than the 800 pixel width or height limit that is used by this site. THe problem is that some hosting sites (I use PBase.com) will automatically reduce the size of your image to 800 pixels wide or tall unless you specify the full image. When they do this, sometimes, the image sometimes goes rather soft.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harold_L
Goldmember
1,192 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
     
Jan 16, 2006 18:15 |  #13

Sleepe, what post-processing software do you have? Most people seem to have PhotoShop, in some version. I happen to use Picture Window Pro - there are others. Most will have a sharpening function, such as unsharp masking. After setting a couple of parameters, this will be automatically applied to the image. And yes, it can sharpen even a slightly out of focus image. You can also brighten and/or change the color staturation of the image in several, increasingly sophisticated ways. Applying these techniques could increase the "snap" of the image.


Harold
Canon Rebel XT w/ Tamron 28-75 mm F2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,629 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Union Pacific Power, New to Forum, looking for opinions.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1235 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.