Is this flash worth upgrading to over the 580? I have no idea what this flash does different and I don't want to waste money if I don't really need it. Thanks in advance
DownsPhotography Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Apr 17, 2013 21:56 | #1 Is this flash worth upgrading to over the 580? I have no idea what this flash does different and I don't want to waste money if I don't really need it. Thanks in advance | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlashZebra This space available 4,427 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Northern Kentucky More info | Apr 17, 2013 21:59 | #2 Possibly you may just want to read this thread, or the several other like threads.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmward Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 17, 2013 21:59 | #3 With the 5DIII you have it is the best solution since the camera supports all its capabilities as a radio triggered speedlite. Naturally, that assumes you have at least an STE3 on the camera, or a 600 to control the 600 that's off camera. David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Apr 18, 2013 03:50 | #4 FlashZebra wrote in post #15839964 Possibly you may just want to read this thread, or the several other like threads. https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1246037 Enjoy! Lon thanks | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2013 05:52 | #5 The 600EX has a built in radio trigger and the 580EX II doesn't. If you are doing a lot of off camera flash I would recommend it. If not the 580EXII is more then plenty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Apr 18, 2013 07:27 | #6 I'm working through upgrading right now... I've ordered a 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT, just waiting on them to get here. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
InsaneO Member 79 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Apr 18, 2013 10:18 | #7 I just got 600ex-rt but I also have 580ex II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Apr 18, 2013 10:38 | #8 A couple questions of my own if you don't mind; GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Apr 18, 2013 10:42 | #9 InsaneO wrote in post #15841452 I just got 600ex-rt but I also have 580ex II. I will be selling 580ex later. I was looking for 600ex (since I will never use RT function) but Canon decided not to sell it in USA for some reason while idiot Canon rep was swearing up and down that 600ex does not exist. But the cover of the manual says 600ex-rt and 600ex. Anyway, the single reason I got 600 is for it's ability to zoom to 200mm. Let me see if I can describe it. With 580ex and other flashes on the market going to 105mm if you shoot far you get main subject well lit but background is not. With 600ex you get the same intensity on your subject but also a lot more light on the background that actually makes for more pleasant pictures, less vignetting too. I am actually building my own flash extender to reach even farther than that. Even though the guide number is about the same on both flashes 580ex basically waste light with longer lenses. Other than that there is no reason to upgrade. If the above highlighted phrase is the primary reason you bought the 600EX-RT, I'm afraid you will be very much disappointed with the 600EX-RT because your flash picture in that situation will not look any different whether it's shot with a 600 or a 580. What the 600EX-RT will do is to concentrate more light on the subject and the background so that less battery energy is required to light the scene. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Apr 18, 2013 10:58 | #10 InsaneO wrote in post #15841452 ... I am actually building my own flash extender to reach even farther than that..... Have you seen these; GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Apr 18, 2013 11:03 | #11 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #15841522 A couple questions of my own if you don't mind; I see mention of compatibility with the 5D III. I take it the 5D3 does not have a radio trigger built in? I would still need two 600s or the STE transmitter? Yes, that is correct. CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #15841522 So what exactly does the 5D3 have then, that makes it more compatible with the 600? Both the 5D3 and the 1Dx allows you to use the Group wireless feature which supposedly is not available with cameras built prior to 2012. CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #15841522 Are there any 3rd party triggers or receivers that will talk to the 600? ie, I have two Canon flashes modded with a sync jack for use with PWs. Can I replace the PWs with something that will allow them to talk to the 600s. No, there are currently no 3rd party radio triggers that are compatible with the 600EX-RT. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Apr 18, 2013 11:18 | #12 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #15841522 A couple questions of my own if you don't mind; I see mention of compatibility with the 5D III. I take it the 5D3 does not have a radio trigger built in? I would still need two 600s or the STE transmitter? So what exactly does the 5D3 have then, that makes it more compatible with the 600? Are there any 3rd party triggers or receivers that will talk to the 600? ie, I have two Canon flashes modded with a sync jack for use with PWs. Can I replace the PWs with something that will allow them to talk to the 600s. PacAce mentioned Group capability, but what I believe 2012-later cameras have that make it more compatible with the 600 is... newer firmware. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Apr 18, 2013 11:31 | #13 drvnbysound wrote in post #15841652 PacAce mentioned Group capability, but what I believe 2012-later cameras have that make it more compatible with the 600 is... newer firmware. I personally think there's more than just newer firmware that makes the 2012 and later models fully compatible with the 600EX-RT and the ST-E3. If it were just newer firmware, then Canon could easily update the firmware of all the current EOS models to make them fully compatible with the 600EX-RT. Canon has issued firmware updates for new products in the past so there should be nothing preventing them from doing so with the 600EX-RT if it were just a matter of a firmware update. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Apr 18, 2013 11:36 | #14 I assume that it's just marketing incentive... but I've been wrong before. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Apr 18, 2013 11:46 | #15 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1592 guests, 182 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||