Scrumhalf wrote in post #15850357
I wonder if there's a monopod that looks like a walking stick! Hmm... I need to look into this. Maybe I sense a business opportunity here. Surely it would be most churlish of the security guys to take away a guy's walking stick!.

Yes, there is a monopod which looks like a walking stick. I went specifically looking for just such a thing two years ago - and found it. Absolutely USELESS as a walking stick, very flimsy, and probably likewise as a monopod - especially as it only extended high enough to make the user need to kneel down. If you can kneel down and get back up again, you most probably don't actually need a walking stick all that much. I certainly need far more support than that thing offered. No sale.
steve_douglass wrote in post #15852371
If the sign says no tripod ... why couldn't you use a monopod?? if its an issue with picture taking the the sign would say no pictures ... right?? I think they say no tripods because of the footprint and liability of a tripping hazard?
I have been prevented from:
- Using a monopod in Trier (Germany) Cathedral, despite being in a pew and creating NO obstruction at all.
- I have been stopped from using a monopod in Sacre Coeur (Paris, France) even though it was rigged as a walking stick with screw-off handle.
- I have been extremely politely asked not to use my camera bag as a beanbag support on a pew back in Mosteiro da Santa Maria de Belém (aka Saint Jerome's Monastery) in Lisbon, Portugal.
Reasons? Goodness only knows as on each occasion there was absolutely no way I could have been accused of causing an obstruction. Similarly, there was no possibility of causing any damage whatsoever to the fabric of the building. My hunch is that it is
far more to do with the sale of official photographs than any Health & Safety considerations. YMMV of course, I truly hope it does and that you get the images you want.