Took this shot on the day of delivery. My wife was a good sport . Does not care to have her picture taken. Purchased the lens to take pictures of the grand kids but suspect it can do a whole lot more. C and C appreciated
Apr 21, 2013 08:32 | #1 Took this shot on the day of delivery. My wife was a good sport . Does not care to have her picture taken. Purchased the lens to take pictures of the grand kids but suspect it can do a whole lot more. C and C appreciated Canon 5D3, 60D, 70-200 L f4 IS, 17-40L,16-35f4, 24-105L,100 f2.8, 85 f/1.8, 55-250 IS, 400 f/5.6, Ziess 21 2.8, canon 1.4, 430EX www.flickr.com/photos/maggiesguy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joedlh Cream of the Crop 5,511 posts Gallery: 52 photos Likes: 684 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea. More info | Apr 21, 2013 12:19 | #2 Good focus on the eyes. Not sure why you used f/2.8 and stood so close, as it put her chin and cheekbones out of focus. Her skin is a tad too red. Or perhaps it's the contrast with the bright green background, which would have contributed in a better way if it wasn't so bright. My suggestion is to resist using the wide aperture of a wide aperture lens unless you're fine with the narrow depth of field. Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks Joe, that's two of us not sure why I used 2.8. Yes, you are right about the skin being two red. On second look her hair looks pink on the top. I am a landscape guy who has won a few awards for my work but have a lot to learn with my new lens. Again this was my every first shot. Thank you for you input. Canon 5D3, 60D, 70-200 L f4 IS, 17-40L,16-35f4, 24-105L,100 f2.8, 85 f/1.8, 55-250 IS, 400 f/5.6, Ziess 21 2.8, canon 1.4, 430EX www.flickr.com/photos/maggiesguy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 21, 2013 16:46 | #4 It looks over-exposed to me. ?? Ray
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Apr 21, 2013 19:55 | #5 The processing and crop is poor, imo. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I agree that the processing and crop is very bad. I should of waited before posting. I went back and looked at my RAW file and can now see how far off I was with the skin tones. No more C&C needed. Wish I could delete it Canon 5D3, 60D, 70-200 L f4 IS, 17-40L,16-35f4, 24-105L,100 f2.8, 85 f/1.8, 55-250 IS, 400 f/5.6, Ziess 21 2.8, canon 1.4, 430EX www.flickr.com/photos/maggiesguy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HDr Member 124 posts Joined Feb 2012 More info | Apr 22, 2013 17:22 | #7 Colors off, overexposed, out of focus. Canon 6D | Canon 17-40mm f/4L USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 II | Canon 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM | B+W 77mm ND 3.0 1000X | B+W 77mm ND 1.8 64x | Canon 580EX II Speedlite | Yongnuo 622C Transceivers | Tripods, Umbrellas, Bags and Other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tmoore323 Goldmember 1,945 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Apr 22, 2013 17:31 | #8 Don't delete it, re-shoot it and show us the results - I love this lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
howzitboy Goldmember 2,948 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Hawaii More info | Apr 22, 2013 19:34 | #9 if back up and try get more background in the shot. no reason to shoot a passport photo of her! show of the pretty nature colors! http://onehourwedding.blogspot.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bubbygator I can't tell the difference 1,477 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 63 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles More info | Apr 22, 2013 21:01 | #10 This lens will be great with the kids. Put camera in Tv mode, set on something like 1/640 to stop their action, and adjust ISO according to how much light is available ... just click a few shots and you will be easily able to tell how much ISO to add or subtract. The auto-focus on this lens is super fast and accurate - just don't shoot at 2.8 except when the poor lighting forces you to do so. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 23, 2013 00:26 | #11 agree this is too close for 2.8. it's ok with this lens if you have some distance and want a good background blur. On a separate but related note. Double check your micro-adjust. Mine was quite a bit off. I've always been a photographer, but I haven't always had a camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for all of your comments and for going easy on me. (Well most of you went easy Canon 5D3, 60D, 70-200 L f4 IS, 17-40L,16-35f4, 24-105L,100 f2.8, 85 f/1.8, 55-250 IS, 400 f/5.6, Ziess 21 2.8, canon 1.4, 430EX www.flickr.com/photos/maggiesguy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1338 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||