Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Apr 2013 (Sunday) 21:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Next lens.. 135L or 70-200 f4?

 
LucasCK
Senior Member
352 posts
Likes: 27
Joined May 2010
     
Apr 21, 2013 21:55 |  #1

Hi all.. I want a long lens for location shoots for weddings..

What do you guys think? I'm leaning towards the 135 as my 24-105 I already use for versatility


5d4, 2x6d, 5d2, 24-70L II, Sigma 35A 1.4, Canon 70-200 2.8L II, 135 2.0L, 430ex2, 600ex-rt
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com (external link)
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com …ane-wedding-photographer/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeremyKPhoto
Goldmember
1,634 posts
Likes: 46
Joined Apr 2012
     
Apr 21, 2013 21:58 |  #2

Im assuming mainly indoors? If you are doing indoors then you will want a faster lens. If you cannot get a 2.8 70-200 then get the 135 to use in conjunction with your 85 1.8.


5D Mark III / 70-200 2.8L IS II / 24-105L / 50 1.8 stm / Tamron 70-300 VC / Sigma 85mm 1.4 Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LucasCK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
352 posts
Likes: 27
Joined May 2010
     
Apr 21, 2013 22:00 as a reply to  @ JeremyKPhoto's post |  #3

I was thinking more for the outside offical photos


5d4, 2x6d, 5d2, 24-70L II, Sigma 35A 1.4, Canon 70-200 2.8L II, 135 2.0L, 430ex2, 600ex-rt
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com (external link)
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com …ane-wedding-photographer/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,328 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2516
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Apr 21, 2013 22:03 |  #4

I never felt that the 135mm les was quite long enough, especially on a full frame camera. This was true even when the 135mm was the longest focal length available on rangefinder 35mm cameras without a reflex housing.

IMO, the 70-200mm f/2.8L (series) lens or even the 70-200mm f/4L IS lens is far more versatile than a 135mm prime...


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeremyKPhoto
Goldmember
1,634 posts
Likes: 46
Joined Apr 2012
     
Apr 21, 2013 22:04 |  #5

For outside the 70-200 would work well. So it all depends on if you want the bokeh that the 135 offers or if you prefer the versatility the 70-200 offers.

Since you already have the 24-105 f/4, I personally would get the 135L. That will give you something more to work with (dof wise) along with the 85 1.8.


5D Mark III / 70-200 2.8L IS II / 24-105L / 50 1.8 stm / Tamron 70-300 VC / Sigma 85mm 1.4 Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_6480
Member
38 posts
Joined Jan 2013
     
Apr 22, 2013 14:07 as a reply to  @ JeremyKPhoto's post |  #6

I'd go for the canon 70-200 f/4.

The ideal lens is the 70-200 f/2.8 but I assume this isn't in your price range




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nwardrip
Member
90 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: San Diego
     
Apr 25, 2013 03:13 |  #7

If you're mainly using it outside, get the 70-200 f/4. If you can swing it, save a little longer and get the 70-200 f/2.8 non-IS. It is well worth it!


2x EOS R5, EOS R6, various L and Art glass

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edwin ­ Herdman
Senior Member
747 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Apr 25, 2013 03:31 as a reply to  @ nwardrip's post |  #8

f/2 versus f/4. No contest IMO. On crop, the 135L comes out to somewhere near 200mm (although apparent blur amount will be reduced, since you're seeing less of the frame). You can stage your distance to your liking and I don't see 200mm as a great advantage unless it's coming in at a wider possible aperture.

On the other hand, if you tend to always stop down a bit, 200mm f/4 might be just fine and should guarantee very nice OOF circles. The 135L's should be nicer still on account of it being a prime versus a zoom, however.

Of course, I'd go with the 120-300mm f/2.8 and get extreme blur capability :cool: Also extreme fatigue however...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vaflower
Senior Member
Avatar
855 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Massachusetts
     
Apr 25, 2013 07:57 |  #9

Unless you need the focal length flexibility ( like covering an event ), 135 L win outdoor portrait shooting easy.


Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeeRatters
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,903 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9560
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Apr 25, 2013 09:34 |  #10

Down to personal choice as to whether you like primes/wide apertures or having the flexibility of a zoom lens.


>> Flickr << (external link)


>> Instagram<< (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Route246
Senior Member
492 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: NorCalUSA, Tokyo Japan
     
Apr 26, 2013 19:16 |  #11

I have all of these in terms of reach. I would lean towards the 135L


Gear List, Blog, (external link) Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,865 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Next lens.. 135L or 70-200 f4?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1516 guests, 186 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.