Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 23 Apr 2013 (Tuesday) 16:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Upgrade from 20D, what to buy? 1DsII or 5DII?

 
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Apr 23, 2013 16:05 |  #1

Hello folks,

after a long time without following the activities of Canon or the forum, I have decided that it is time to look into upgrading my trusty 20D.

The reasoning behind that is that so far I had concentrated on adding lenses to the body, I now typicall use the Sigma 10-20/4.0, the Sigma 30/1.4, the Canon 50/1.4 and the Canon 80-200/2.8L. I also have a Tamron 28-75/2.8, Tokina 17/3.5 and some M42 primes (e.g. the CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5), but use these rarely.

What am I looking into? Hmm, full frame would be great, low light performance would certainly be appreciated, and great AF performance would also not go amiss. Problem is, I really do not know what of those I want most. Probably a good compromise?

The 1Ds II, the 1D II, and the 5D II were at some point in time my unattainable dream cameras (at their launch prices). Right now I have the feeling that now is the moment where I can get more from buying a new (used) body than adding more lenses to my existing 20D. My budget would be around EUR 1.000, which should buy any of these. I am not so much looking into getting another crop camera like the 60D or 7D or similar, but I might also pick up an Eos M as addition to the "big" camera.

So, any great tips? Have I forgotten anything?

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timbop
Goldmember
Avatar
2,980 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 18
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
     
Apr 23, 2013 16:35 |  #2

Well, what is most important to get? Each of those bodies has a different strength, so you need to rank them in order of preference. You also don't mention other capabilites being of interest - such as video or the MUCH better LCD of the 5dm2 (you can actually see it in daylight!). Personally I would say the only thing the 1dm2 does better is the frame rate, but if you are okay with the 5fps of the 20d then the 1dm2 doesn't really bring anything over the 1ds2 or 5d2. So, that probably limits your real choices to the 5d2 and 1ds2:
- The 5dm2 has almost exactly the same AF as the 20d, so 1ds2 has far better AF
- The 5dm2 has better high ISO, more mpix, video, and a far superior LCD to the 1ds2
- The 5dm2 uses newer batteries and can go gripless, so can be lighter and more compact than the 1ds2
- The 1ds2 is weather sealed and built like a tank

IMHO if you are generally happy with the 20D and are just looking to upgrade image quality and high ISo performance, the 5d2 makes the most sense. If you are frustrated with the 20d's AF, then the 1ds2 is the way to go


Current: 5DM3, 6D, 8mm fish, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/2.8IS, 85/1.8, 100-400/IS v1, lensbaby composer with edge 80, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 80D, 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70/2.8, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/4IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thorrulz
Goldmember
Avatar
3,818 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 469
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Apr 23, 2013 16:43 |  #3

timbop wrote in post #15859552 (external link)
Well, what is most important to get? Each of those bodies has a different strength, so you need to rank them in order of preference. You also don't mention other capabilites being of interest - such as video or the MUCH better LCD of the 5dm2 (you can actually see it in daylight!). Personally I would say the only thing the 1dm2 does better is the frame rate, but if you are okay with the 5fps of the 20d then the 1dm2 doesn't really bring anything over the 1ds2 or 5d2. So, that probably limits your real choices to the 5d2 and 1ds2:
- The 5dm2 has almost exactly the same AF as the 20d, so 1ds2 has far better AF
- The 5dm2 has better high ISO, more mpix, video, and a far superior LCD to the 1ds2
- The 5dm2 uses newer batteries and can go gripless, so can be lighter and more compact than the 1ds2
- The 1ds2 is weather sealed and built like a tank

IMHO if you are generally happy with the 20D and are just looking to upgrade image quality and high ISo performance, the 5d2 makes the most sense. If you are frustrated with the 20d's AF, then the 1ds2 is the way to go

I would concur that the 5D MII would make the best choice based on the OP's criteria.


Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrismarriott66
Senior Member
Avatar
797 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2012
Location: York, UK
     
Apr 24, 2013 05:35 |  #4

Andy_T wrote in post #15859445 (external link)
I now typicall use the Sigma 10-20/4.0, the Sigma 30/1.4, the Canon 50/1.4 and the Canon 80-200/2.8L. I also have a Tamron 28-75/2.8, Tokina 17/3.5 and some M42 primes (e.g. the CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5), but use these rarely.

Andy_T wrote in post #15859445 (external link)
I am not so much looking into getting another crop camera like the 60D or 7D or similar

The only thing to note here is that if you do jump to full frame (or aps-h), then you won't be able to use the Sigma 10-20 or the Sigma 30mm f1.4... If that's fine then great, but if you want an UWA for the FF body then you're going to need another lens, for example. If, however, you're happy with your lens line up and the field of view you get currently, then why not seriously consider the 7d? It's got both great AF and better low-light performance over the 20d.

Don't get me wrong, I get the FF appeal, and I've been sucked in myself, however, your crop-only lenses are worth throwing into the mix when making a decision :)


Chris Marriott Photography (external link)| Facebook (external link)
Complete Gear | 1ds iii | 5d iii | 50d | EF 16-35 f2.8 L USM ii | EF 24-70 f2.8 L USM | Σ 70-200 f2.8 ii EX DG HSM | Σ 35mm f1.4 Art | EF 50mm f1.4 USM | EF 85mm f1.8 USM | EF 85mm f1.2 L USM ii | 600EX-RT | 580EX ii | 430EX ii | YN622Cs |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaomul
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
Apr 24, 2013 06:02 |  #5

I have a 20d and had a 1ds mark 1 (now have a 5d), so while not exactly your list maybe i can still help a little. The 1ds was a fantastic camera in every(autofocus, IQ, build) way except its battery. I bought a few third party replacements and they were ok but still not fantastic. Its image quality in my opinion was at low ISOs (<400) better than any camera I ever had, but it did suffer above this. The 1ds mark II is supposedly better in every regard (same battery though). I would highly recommend this camera,

If however you don't need such a heavy camera the 5d II is a great choice


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
THREAD ­ STARTER
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Apr 24, 2013 13:05 |  #6

Chris,

thank you for your input!

Yes, I agree, the more I look at it, the more the 7D looks like "exactly what I want". That is what I thought when I first heard about that camera, apart from the launch price, unfortunately.

Best regards,
Andy

PS: Another Advantage of the 7D might be that my wife might not necessarily notice that I have a new camera, hmmm...:roll:


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oklaiss
Senior Member
471 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Apr 24, 2013 16:12 |  #7

If you don't shoot many moving subjects I'd go 5d2. The IQ and high ISO performance will be well ahead of your 20d. AF, frame rate and build are the areas where the 1d series excel.


5D Mark II Gripped, 60D Gripped, 450D, 24-105 f/4L, 85 1.8, 70-200 f/4L IS, Nifty Fifty, 28 1.8, B+W/Lee/Cokin/Hitech filters, 430ex II x2
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
THREAD ­ STARTER
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Apr 25, 2013 02:12 |  #8

Oklaiss,

as you have both the 5DII and the 60D, how would you compare these two on image quality?

As I said, I still use my 20D, as it is still capable of making good photos. Of course, there are limitations (e.g. night shots without a tripod) and action shots, where I have to stop down my lenses in order to get more safety on DOF to account for less-than-perfect AF performance - which is of course difficult as the ISO then quickly becomes the limiting factor, with me using the (quite grainy) 1600 setting on my 20D quite often and the 3200 when need be (better to get a grainy image than no image at all).

I am still using my 30/1.4 and 10-20 quite heavily and guess they would perform well on the 7D. On the 5D I guess I would mostly use the Tamron 28-75/2.8, Canon 50/1.4, Canon 80-200/2.8L and the Tokina 17/3.5 prime (which would not be a bad setup I guess).

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edwin ­ Herdman
Senior Member
747 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Apr 25, 2013 03:14 |  #9

5D Mark II prices seem to be all over the place. Not too bad if you buy second-hand, but I'd almost rather get the 6D. I think it stacks up pretty well to the 5D and betters it in the performance of the sensor, while not losing much in other areas.

As posted in another thread, have a gander: http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canon-eos-6d (external link)
Interestingly, while they criticize it a bit for having only one cross-type focus point, they also say that focus point leads the class in low-light sensitivity. Sounds like a winner if you don't need many AF points and can deal with stationary (or nearly so) subjects.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Apr 25, 2013 05:28 |  #10

If you go FF, what are you going to do about lenses? Is your 1000EUR budget exclusive of lens upgrades, or is it for everything? FF will leave you with 50mm as your widest lens. Yes, you can mount your Sigma DC lenses on the FF bodies, but you will get hard vignetting.

As you seem to have started to realise, the 7D may be your best option now; better high ISO performance, better AF, and you can still use all your lenses.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 25, 2013 05:36 as a reply to  @ Sirrith's post |  #11

It's been a while since I researched the subject, but on a FF body isn't there a risk of mirror actually hitting back of the DC lens (or some of them)?
I thought 1.3 crop bodies were safe, FF risky (or smashy)


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
Apr 25, 2013 05:41 |  #12

The OP also mentioned a Tamron 28-75/2.8 and a Tokina 17/3.5. Both of these cover the 135 (APS) sized sensors. I'd say that lens line up will work fine regardless of the class they buy into.

And as far as I know, the only EF mount (i.e. Non adapted) lenses that create a risk fouling the mirror are EF-S lenses, and only if you modify them to remove something on the back of the lens.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
THREAD ­ STARTER
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Apr 25, 2013 06:31 |  #13

Yes, the Tokina 17/3.5 and Tamron 28-75/2.8 are Full Frame lenses for the EOS mount.

While you can technically use both the 10-20 DC and the 30/1.4 DC on a full frame camera without fear of problems with the mirror, you will most likely get vignetting issues (though I still think that the 10-20 might work out to, say, 14 mm without too much vignetting).

All that, of course, makes the 7D so attractive.

And of course, yes, I would certainly love the 6D or the 1Ds MK IV, but those are, as of now, out of my budget.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
uOpt
Goldmember
Avatar
2,283 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Boston, MA, USA
     
Apr 25, 2013 06:38 |  #14

The 1Ds2 uses the old 1D batteries. Those can be fuzzy and worn out and third-party batteries often don't work right (bad fit). There is no automatic sensor cleaning and the LCD sucks. I think the 1Ds2 is a bit overpriced used, the 1D2 is priced more correctly and is essentially the same technology - with drawbacks.

The 5d2 has the simple autofocus, not much else wrong with it except I'd like to have another memory card slot. The 5d2 AF is primitive but within it's limitations reliable and accurate, possibly more so than 5d3 for single AF points. If you don't go after moving targets (birdwatching, airshows) it is a very good camera. Also a great base for messing with vintage lenses.


My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Apr 25, 2013 08:06 |  #15

uOpt wrote in post #15865302 (external link)
The 1Ds2 uses the old 1D batteries. Those can be fuzzy and worn out and third-party batteries often don't work right (bad fit). There is no automatic sensor cleaning and the LCD sucks. I think the 1Ds2 is a bit overpriced used, the 1D2 is priced more correctly and is essentially the same technology - with drawbacks.

The 5d2 has the simple autofocus, not much else wrong with it except I'd like to have another memory card slot. The 5d2 AF is primitive but within it's limitations reliable and accurate, possibly more so than 5d3 for single AF points. If you don't go after moving targets (birdwatching, airshows) it is a very good camera. Also a great base for messing with vintage lenses.

Wow, you shoot with 5dmk3?


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,613 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Upgrade from 20D, what to buy? 1DsII or 5DII?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1506 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.