-= 5D3 Owners Unite! Discuss & Post Photos (3)!

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …anielstoychev/8​696983621/
Monica Murillo by Daniel Stoychev Photography, on Flickr

-Daniel-
1DXII | 5DIII | 135L | Sigma 35 | 24-70L |17-40L | Sigma 150-600C | 600EX-RT
T1i |85 1.8 | 18-55 | Sigma 10mm f/2.8 Fish Eye | Yongnuo YN-622C| Raynox DCR-250
Facebook Flickr 500px

ghost68 wrote in post #15883277
I shoot RAW exclusively and do 90% of my processing in Lightroom 4 (10% in Photoshop CS6)

Same here. I shoot RAW for everything but sports. Post-processing is a lot like cooking, you must season at each stage of preparation or you end up with bland food.

Here's before and after. First is as it sits on my computer, no processing has been done. Second is after processing and it looks more like what it looked to my eye that day. It wasn't as blue as the camera makes it out to be in the first one. It looked more overcast and yellow/green like the final photo

5760 x 3840

EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE: http://img209.imagesha​ck.us/img209/9223/323c​2217.jpg Click here to see our image rules.

EMBED PREVENTED
CUSTOM DOWNLOAD SIZE LIMIT 2.5 MB EXCEEDED: 3.51 MB
http://img823.imagesha​ck.us/img823/8951/6975​6654.jpg

http://emjfotografi.co​m/
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi

1D Mark III, 5D Mark III, EF 17-40 f/4, EF 24-105 f/4 IS, EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6, EF 24 f/1.4, EF 300 f/4 IS, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro & EF-S 10-22
- James
jt-digital-photography Photo Galleries

navydoc wrote in post #15881175
Down on the farm.

^ Some pages back… Boy, if that doesn't look just like the Byron, IL nuclear plant with the surrounding farms.

My Smugmug site

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/nwmr12/86969656​65/
Lonesome Tree by NoahWmR12, on Flickr

5DIII, 5Dc, 24-105L, 100-400L, 14mm Rokinon 21 ZE, 35L, 50 1.4, 50CM 2.5, Rokkor 58mm 1.2. 85 1.8, 135L |S90| Film: Mamiya RZ67 ProII/ Mamiya 7II | Rolleiflex 2.8C
flickr|500px|facebook - Travel/landscape | facebook - Portrait| Instagram
Portfolio

Canon 5D Mark III new firmware 1.2.1 works: Perfect F/8 autofocus!
ISO: 6400, 1/8000s

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …harad_medhavi/8​698393272/
Canon 5D Mark III new firmware 1.2.1 works: Perfect F/8 autofocus! ISO: 6400, 1/8000s The great Indian Crow Pheasant (Centropus sinensis) by Sharad Medhavi, on Flickr

Sharad Medhavi
Facebook, Flickr stream
Canon 5D Mark III | 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2L, 100mm f/2.8L IS, 50mm f/1.4, 17-40mm f/4L, 70-200mm f/4 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, Rokinon 14 2.8

My Smugmug site

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gucrew/86963049​89/
Olivia and Gavin by Adam Gutierrez, on Flickr

Consider me a satellite forever orbiting, I knew all the rules but the rules did not know me...GUARANTEED

1200px: http://www.mhirtreiter​.at/bilder/menschen2/b​absi28.jpg

1200px: http://www.mhirtreiter​.at/bilder/menschen3/l​isa6.jpg

1200px: http://www.mhirtreiter​.at/bilder/menschen3/l​isa7.jpg

1200px: http://www.mhirtreiter​.at/bilder/menschen3/d​iana3.jpg

Homepage: http://www.mhirtreiter​.at
Facebook: https://www.facebook.c​om/mhirtreiter.at
Instagram: https://www.instagram.​com/martin.hirtreiter/

DavidWatts wrote in post #15885512
^ Some pages back… Boy, if that doesn't look just like the Byron, IL nuclear plant with the surrounding farms.

Yep, that's the one.

Image hosted by forum (647310) © navydoc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gene - My Photo Gallery || My USS Oriskany website || My Flickr
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

sharad.medhavi wrote in post #15885781
Canon 5D Mark III new firmware 1.2.1 works: Perfect F/8 autofocus!
ISO: 6400, 1/8000s

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …harad_medhavi/8​698393272/
Canon 5D Mark III new firmware 1.2.1 works: Perfect F/8 autofocus! ISO: 6400, 1/8000s The great Indian Crow Pheasant (Centropus sinensis) by Sharad Medhavi, on Flickr

Just a question, why shoot at ISO 6400 if you're pulling shots at 1/8000 of a second?

-Eric-
I have too many hobbies to be good at any of them.
Flickr

IngersonPCD wrote in post #15885949
=Ingerson"PCD";1588594​9]Just a question, why shoot at ISO 6400 if you're pulling shots at 1/8000 of a second?

Was gonna ask the same thing, also if F8 makes your iso that high tone it down a lil? Or am i not understanding something here, please explain

flickr
500px
5Dmk3 || EF 17-40mm f/4L USM || Carl Zeiss Distagon 21mm f/2.8 || EF 100mm F2.8 L IS USM Macro

Outside Bandelier National Monument

Brian
5D Mark III | 24-105 F4L | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 35 1.4 | 100 2.8 | 580EX II | 430EX

Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Canon 5d3 + G15, Sigma 50-500mm OS, Tamron 28-300mm VC, Sigma 24-70mm f2.8, Canon 50mm f1.8, yungnuo 565 and 568 flashes and yn622c triggers