Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 24 Apr 2013 (Wednesday) 20:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

DWF Members?

 
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Apr 24, 2013 20:32 |  #1

Not sure if anyone here is also a member, but apparently DWF has been sold, and they've made a ton of what used to be private content public.

If you are or were a member and you're interested to see what might be coming up under your name, just go to Google and search for: "your username" site:digitalweddingfor​um.com


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 26, 2013 00:38 |  #2

Interesting. Thanks for the heads up.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Apr 26, 2013 05:40 |  #3

Total cluster **** right now.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Toogy
"I like pictures of myself!"
Avatar
6,248 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Apr 26, 2013 09:46 |  #4

Wow, this doesn't seem right....



Good Light and Shoot to the Right....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonwhite
Goldmember
Avatar
1,279 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Apr 26, 2013 12:12 |  #5

That's really bad, I used to be a member there but stopped my subscription after a couple of years when I realised I just wasn't using it enough. It never felt like home and whilst some of the advice was golden the natives always seemed somewhat hostile.

Everyone and the world now seems to be able to read the original post in many threads there. Some forum sections still seem to be locked down but some of them you can go through reading what each thread starter has written, including in the business forum which seems a really bad idea.

http://www.digitalwedd​ingforum.com/forum/f23​/ (external link)

So many posts on just the first page with stuff that I am sure the posters would not want to be publicly viewable!


Wedding Portfolio Website (external link) | Wedding Photographer Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Apr 26, 2013 16:33 |  #6

Hmmm, DWF is sold? No wonder I haven't seen/heard Jeff anywhere for the past while.

And it really sucks that they are now displaying original posts in threads. Seriously? WTF are they thinking? How is it good for anyone to publicly display a thread titled, "I want to fire my clients" with the entire description about how annoying and irritating they are? Seriously that is just bad. I'm not sure if I want to renew anymore. HUGE WTF!


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 26, 2013 16:46 |  #7

picturecrazy wrote in post #15870650 (external link)
.... How is it good for anyone to publicly display a thread titled, "I want to fire my clients" with the entire description about how annoying and irritating they are? Seriously that is just bad. ...

Wait, so am I understanding this correctly,. What was a private member only forum, now all the old posts are open to the public?

Does anyone have a copy of the original TOS?
Any mention of expectation of privacy? (unlikely but...)


Wow, that is a terrible Idea!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Apr 26, 2013 16:57 |  #8

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #15870680 (external link)
Wait, so am I understanding this correctly,. What was a private member only forum, now all the old posts are open to the public?

Does anyone have a copy of the original TOS?
Any mention of expectation of privacy? (unlikely but...)


Wow, that is a terrible Idea!

Yes it was a private members only forum, with membership contingent upon paying a fee, and verification that you are a photography professional. It *WAS* a safe place where professionals could come together to help each other out when in need.

But now they have *sorta* opened it up. All the thread titles now appear publicly, and the first post in the thread is publicly displayed (which is usually where all the juicy stuff is anyhow) and then the first 60 characters of all the thread replies are displayed.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 26, 2013 20:12 |  #9

They messed up, it's actually more open than they meant it to be. The first post on each page is open, not just each thread. They've tried to hide peoples identities but they haven't done it well.

There was an expectation of privacy. The manager's getting hell on facebook, people have released his name and address which is totally wrong. His employees are getting hassled on their own business websites. Basically a massive sh.t storm is brewing. A LOT of people have said they're not renewing their membership.

The new owners (an investment group) tried to increase revenue. Maybe they will in the long term, but maybe they've killed it as well.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Apr 26, 2013 20:19 |  #10

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #15870680 (external link)
Wait, so am I understanding this correctly,. What was a private member only forum, now all the old posts are open to the public?

Does anyone have a copy of the original TOS?
Any mention of expectation of privacy? (unlikely but...)


Wow, that is a terrible Idea!

Original TOS: (external link)

Our Privacy Policy:
Because members discuss sensitive matters concerning their businesses, we do not permit anonymous membership to the DWF. Your name and state or province are listed in your member profile. Every reasonable effort has been made to protect member profiles from the non-member public, spambots, and search engines.



The new owners (an investment group) tried to increase revenue. Maybe they will in the long term, but maybe they've killed it as well.

I think the new owners killed it. I don't think anyone is going to trust DWF anymore and it was already dwindling a great deal. I'm paid through Sept and I doubt that I will keep up with it afterwards.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 26, 2013 21:58 |  #11

Technically I suspect they've met the letter of the agreement as member profiles aren't visible, but not the spirit of it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Apr 26, 2013 22:32 |  #12

The whole thing stinks


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RangersForever
Senior Member
302 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Apr 27, 2013 04:06 |  #13

Smacks of people with no links to the industry coming in and shaking things up without any thought for the people they are shaking.

Can see it working long term but they better bunker down for the time being!


Scotland Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4201
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Apr 27, 2013 07:38 as a reply to  @ RangersForever's post |  #14

There are many in this industry who hide behind the disguise of " i just want to help and give back" that are strictly there to put $$$ in their pockets. Jeff and others are there to make $$$ and the expense of anyone........Look..th​e entire industry is full of photographers trying to make names for themselves, trying to get on the speaking circuits because there is big bucks in it. The MAJORITY of these speakers are getting 3-5000.00 to show up to events and teach a 6-8 hr class.

I will not be renewing my PPA membership this year. The Teaching staff has some of the worst offenders in this industry.The information being taught is often rehashed re polished basic 101 photography with pipe dreams of big $$ and sales averages being sold to the entry level photography crowd. Its really sad whats going on. When you really get into the meat and potatoes of it...much of the information is sensationalized and not true.

My opinion- if you need help with technique, spend $$ wisely and ask around before you sign up. In DWF's defense, I will bet the owner had no clue they would stoop to this when it was sold out..........bottom line.....a paid forum or online club like this is still on the internet...you should be very careful before you insert your foot in your mouth.....it can always come back to bite you

Mark my word....Some publication is going to publish an article with a headline like....What photographers really think about their clients...they are going to sensationalize the crap out of this and the industry will continue to struggle with issues such as this. They are not going to say.. wow look at the really good job John Doe Photography did when he captured this featured wedding ( never mind the fact that John Doe probably paid someplace to get it published)........Nope​.. that wont sell. They are going to continue to publish crap like....Why you dont need to spend big $$ for a professional photographer,, find a college kid that knows basic photography to photograph your wedding,, This is what photographers really think about their clients.. you can bet its coming...........Botto​m line....be careful what you say and do on any public forum.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Apr 28, 2013 15:53 |  #15

Advertisers are now withdrawing support.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,212 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
DWF Members?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1312 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.